8 measurements spanning 10 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,374–12,387 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 19:36
12,377
-5
14 Aug 2026, 07:58
12,382
-3
10 Aug 2026, 22:21
12,385
+7
9 Aug 2026, 19:01
12,378
+3
8 Aug 2026, 18:46
12,375
-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:36
12,376
-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:20
12,377
+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:03
12,376
first reading
Engagement
126 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.69%
avg views ÷ 12,377 subscribers
Avg views / post
704
126 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.409%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
126
of 126 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 126 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
126 (5 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
88,710
Reactions total
142
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
56s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
133 reactions across 39 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 4924910651815494684
133
100.0%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 126 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 126 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shoalresearch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 126 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Jane Street Posted a $15 Billion Loss in July Amid the Collapse of Situational Awareness
> The New York-based firm disclosed the figure to lenders as part of a deal to shift its roughly $11bn public debt pile to private investors.
Source: https://www.ft.com/content/47dd5308-dd17-404a-a615-61046defd697?syn-25a6b1a6=1
ChatGPT Now Lets You Open and Edit Google Drive Docs, Sheets, and Slides Without Switching Tabs.
Source: https://x.com/ChatGPT/status/2088044956091089281
Z.ai Releases GLM-5.3: Frontier Coding with Emergent Cyber Capabilities
> A major post-training upgrade over GLM-5.2, delivering a 50% improvement in coding and open-source SOTA performance on several benchmarks.
> It is a major leap in cybersecurity, developing emergent cyber capabilities that more than double its predecessor on exploitation benchmarks.
> It delivers stronger capabilities in vulnerability discove…
The AI Engineering Skills Map
> Building and deploying AI applications
> Software engineering fundamentals
> Using coding agents
> Shaping the build
Source: https://x.com/AndrewYNg/status/2088302050706686198
Grayscale argues Ethereum and Solana could be getting scarcer as both may introduce code changes that cut annual inflation and reduce future token supply, potentially supporting higher prices.
Source: https://www.grayscale.com/the-stack/ethereum-and-solana-tokenomics-under-review
The Cognitive Cost of Brain Rot: Indirect Effects on Depression via Burnout, Stress, and Anxiety
Brain rot: Chronic cognitive fatigue from excessive digital engagement
> This study examined 439 participants and found that brain rot does not directly cause depression, but triggers a "loss spiral" through burnout, which then elevates stress and anxiety, ultimately leading to depressive symptoms.
Source: https://jour…
On Why Crypto Was Cooler in 2022 Than in 2026
> While crypto was one of the coolest tech categories in 2022, by 2026 it feels more like backend for fintech as AI, robotics, defense tech, nuclear, and biohacking capture the spotlight.
> “SOVs (Store of Values e.g bitcoin) are really struggling with a lack of identity.”
> And since Bitcoin is valued on perception, the shift in where venture dollars and young talent …
SpaceX Has Completed its $60 Billion Acquisition of Cursor
> Cursor will help accelerate Grok AI development
Source: https://x.com/SpaceXAI/status/2088250109188608289
August 13th Rollup
🐚Research & Ideation💡
• DCo: Dollars Are a Technology
• WSJ: The Jobless Boom Has Arrived
• Polarthedegen: On Edge and Max Extracting
• Castle Labs: The Expanding Business Model of Blockchains
🐚Project Updates🔔
• Sharplink is Staking $200M of ETH Through Lido
• Ethereum Foundation Abandons Poseidon, Pivots to SHA and BLAKE
• Trezor Shipping Provider Data Breach Exposes Personal Details of Nearly …
Binance to Stop Processing Transactions With 11 Crypto Platforms, Including HTX and EXMO, From Aug. 23 Following Regulatory Developments
Source: https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/detail/af2be67dc03c4673b4f56c42db948253
Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @shoalresearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 12,360 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Wu Blockchain News @wublockchainenglish · 253,066 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Investigations by ZachXBT @investigations · 105,015 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
Drops Analytics @drops_analytics · 681,655 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
unfolded. @unfolded · 118,843 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shoal Research Hub” (@shoalresearch), 12,377 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shoalresearch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.