HARMONY LAYER 1 EXPLOITED; 4B ONE TOKENS MINTED UNAUTHORIZED, 26% SUPPLY SOURCE

Channel
Gong Jiao Wei 巩娇玮
@gongjiaoweiy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,732subscribers
-48 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001551169718 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gongjiaoweiy |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gongjiaoweiy |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 4,732 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 4,737 | -6 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 4,743 | -20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:54 | 4,763 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 4,775 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 4,779 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 4,785 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 4,784 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 4,781 | +10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 4,771 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 4,775 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 4,778 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 4,780 | first reading |
Engagement
77 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 77 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 17 | 48.6% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 37.1% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
owari da
😭4
https://x.com/i/status/2087370700999028777
Strategy CEO Phong Le: Company to Resume Bitcoin Purchases Later This Year According to FOX Business, Strategy CEO Phong Le stated that the company plans to resume accumulating Bitcoin later this year, despite recent sales of portions of its holdings that drew market scrutiny. Le noted that Strategy has purchased around 175,000 Bitcoin since the beginning of the year while selling roughly 7,000 BTC, making its buyin…
Sellers are getting exhausted, but have not reached levels we saw in past $BTC bear markets. According to the Seller Exhaustion Constant (30d), the historical bottoming signature has not confirmed yet. We continue to monitor for selling to stall further.
👍1
The stock market may be doing so well that it’s causing more baby boomers and Gen Xers to drop out of the labor force Strong stock market gains are boosting retirement savings and encouraging Americans to leave the workforce early. This financial cushion, paired with a slow hiring market that makes finding new jobs difficult, has pushed labor force participation downwards Source
USDT Supply Shrinks by $4B Over 60 Days as Investors May Be Exiting Crypto According to CryptoQuant data, USDT’s 60-day rolling supply change has declined by about $4 billion, including an $870 million drop over the past 11 days alone. Analyst Stacy Muur said some investors appear to be exiting crypto altogether by converting stablecoins back into fiat, while changing stablecoin yields may also be contributing to th…
*ANTHROPIC TARGETING LATE SEPTEMBER OR EARLY OCTOBER IPO, SOURCES SAY -- WSJ
IRAS (Singapore's tax agency) new framework: crypto-asset service providers must collect user data and report transaction info, data collection to begin in 2027 • Full trade surveillance from 2027: Exchanges must track and aggregate every user's crypto-fiat trades, crypto-to-crypto trades, retail payments >USD 50k, and withdrawals (including transfers to self-custody/unknown wallets) • Auto-reporting to tax authorit…
😭7❤1
BlackRock Cuts IBIT Bitcoin Conversion Minimum to $1 Million From $25 Million Bitcoin holders can now convert BTC in kind into shares of BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) with a minimum transaction size of USD 1 million, down sharply from USD 25 million previously, according to Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas. BlackRock digital-assets head Robbie Mitchnick said the firm hopes to lower the threshold furth…
https://x.com/bluntz_capital/status/2086965264500031559?s=46
*ANTHROPIC STRIKES $9 BILLION COMPUTING DEAL WITH RIOT PLATFORMS $RIOT
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @gongjiaoweiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@wublockchainenglish · 236,0239 postsAhboyash Reads
@ahboyashreads · 15,7948 postsIan's Intel
@iansintel · 15,0775 postsFrens Market Feeds
@RetardFrens · 3,3284 poststradfi
@trad_fin · 10,7274 postsZoomer News
@ZoomerfiedNews · 22,4462 postsCrypto Mumbles
@cryptomumbles · 9,4472 postsunfolded.
@unfolded · 117,4422 postsNew Listings Feed +
@NewListingsFeedPlus · 2,0831 postPhoenixNews (Only Important)
@PhoenixNewsImportant · 5,0261 postThe Block News Lite
@TheBlockNewsLite · 1,6431 postATR News Feed
@asiatechreview · 4191 postGlassnode
@glassnode · 44,2121 postinfinityhedge
@infinityhedge · 45,8641 postPika World Learners Bank
@invest_with_pika_world · 2,3931 postMarket News Feed
@marketfeed · 38,6581 postMlm onchain
@mlmonchain · 28,3411 postImportant news [proliquid.xyz]
@proliquid_news · 4451 postTradehaven
@tradehaven · 9,3171 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@gongjiaoweiy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@unfolded_defi · 21,864
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
@wublockchainenglish · 236,023
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@marketsAlpha · 25,428
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
@cryptonarratives1 · 21,651
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
@kirbycrypto · 39,913
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
@infinityhedge · 45,864
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
@marketfeed · 38,658
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
@singaporeHDB · 51,567
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
@edgepropsg · 21,510
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 September 2026
@TheStraitsTimes · 269,666
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 11 August 2026
@dollarsandsense · 25,524
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
@eatbooksg · 51,878
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 24 August 2026
@the_block_crypto · 25,027
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
@TreeNewsFeed · 34,778
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
@cnalatest · 225,881
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
@goodtofly · 80,149
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 18 August 2026
@Govsg · 239,193
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 11 August 2026
@SGResearchLobang · 20,899
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 September 2026
@thewokesalaryman · 34,393
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 September 2026
@dateideas · 60,153
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 August 2026
@mustsharenews · 55,409
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 23 August 2026
@sgxinvest · 25,177
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
@sgadulting101 · 26,017
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 13 September 2026
@sgweekend · 85,880
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gong Jiao Wei 巩娇玮” (@gongjiaoweiy), 4,732 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gongjiaoweiy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.