Channel
@QCPbroadcast
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,633subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001453658987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QCPbroadcast |
| Description | https://linktr.ee/qcpgroup |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QCPbroadcast |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 13,633 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 13,635 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 13,639 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 13,642 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 13,646 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 13,648 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 13,649 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 13,649 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (10 June 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26,910 |
| Reactions total | 66 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 02:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
154 reactions across 22 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 83 | 53.9% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 20.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 12.3% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 9.74% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.30% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.649% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
QCP Macro Themes - 12 August 2026 The Fed held rates at 3.50%–3.75% for a fifth consecutive meeting, but the 9–3 vote revealed its deepest split since September 2016. Three dissenters argued that persistent inflation and a resilient labour market warranted earlier action, while reduced forward guidance has made each meeting harder to price. Markets still assign a 57% chance of a September rate cut, even as the 30-y…
❤4
QCP Market Colour, 7 August 2026 BTC has recovered from around 62.5k at the start of the week to trade back near 64k. The move stands out less for its momentum than for what the market has absorbed: Strategy sold 1,638 BTC for approximately $105m, while reported losses from the Coldcard security incident have risen to around $110m. Neither event resulted in a sustained break lower. Options markets reflect a similar…
❤6
QCP Macro Themes - 5 August 2026 The Fed held rates at 3.50%–3.75% for a fifth consecutive meeting, but the 9–3 vote revealed its deepest split since September 2016. Three dissenters argued that persistent inflation and a resilient labour market warranted earlier action, while reduced forward guidance has made each meeting harder to price. Markets are still assigning a 57% chance of a September rate cut, even as th…
❤7
QCP Market Colour, 3 August 2026 The US has joined Japan in a rare coordinated effort to support the yen, with the New York Fed purchasing yen on behalf of the US Treasury during Friday’s operation. It was the first coordinated US–Japan FX intervention since 2011 and the first joint operation specifically supporting the yen since 1998. The timing puts the long end of the Treasury curve firmly in focus. The 30-year …
❤8👍3🔥2
QCP Market Colour, 31 July 2026 The Fed held rates at 3.50%–3.75%, but three dissents in favour of a hike and Chair Warsh’s move away from explicit forward guidance gave the decision a hawkish tone. Markets initially responded by reassessing the path for rates. US equities sold off following the announcement before rebounding as earnings returned to the foreground, led by a sharp rally in Microsoft. BTC also moved l…
❤3
QCP Macro Themes - 29 July 2026 Early earnings suggest AI infrastructure momentum remains intact. Celestica reported revenue of $4.70bn, up 62% YoY, and lifted its FY26 guidance to $20.5bn, while Seagate and Teradyne pointed to continued strength in storage, testing and compute demand. The focus now shifts to Microsoft, Meta, Apple and Amazon. Their results need to show that AI spending is translating into cloud gr…
👍6
QCP Market Colour, 27 July 2026 Markets enter a pivotal week with rates firmly in focus. US equities ended Friday mixed as weakness in large-cap technology stocks continued, while the 10-year Treasury yield eased after reaching its highest level since January 2025 earlier in the week. Attention now turns to Wednesday’s FOMC meeting, where markets will focus not only on the policy decision, but also on how the Fed a…
❤5
QCP Macro Themes - 23 July 2026 Alphabet beat on cloud and search, and still fell 4% after-hours. The problem was not the quarter but the spending behind it, with 2026 AI capex lifted to $195-205bn reviving margin-durability concerns. That is the tension running through the tape. TSMC delivered Q2 revenue at the top of guidance and ASML raised its 2026 outlook, so the semis momentum is real. But the market is no lo…
❤🔥6👌2
QCP Market Colour, 20 July 2026 Markets are firmly risk-off, with geopolitics adding another layer of pressure. Oil is supported, equities are under strain, and BTC is holding a narrow $63,000 to $65,000 range. US equities ended the week lower, led by semiconductors as investors grew concerned that hyperscalers could moderate AI infrastructure spending. Capital rotated toward defensives and energy, with Brent above…
❤🔥5
QCP Macro Themes - 16 July 2026 The clearest feature of this week's tape is disagreement. In oil, rates, China and crypto funding, the headline points one way while the underlying condition points the other. Oil is the sharpest example. The peace deal is in crisis and Hormuz traffic has fallen to its lowest since late May, yet underneath that, supply is recovering as Saudi Arabia resets pricing and OPEC+ lifts quot…
🔥4❤2
QCP Digital Assets Market Outlook | Q3 2026 Four things that actually matter this quarter: 1. The macro backdrop and a Fed that's harder to read 2. AI versus crypto capital rotation 3. Why the corporate treasury bid now comes with conditions attached, and 4. How we're thinking about positioning across BTC, ETH, SOL and options. Our deepest read of the quarter: the rates backdrop, why $BTC still trades as a high-be…
❤3
QCP Market Colour, 13 July 2026 Crypto enters the week with little conviction as markets brace for a packed calendar of macro and corporate catalysts. Tuesday's US CPI release and Fed Chair Warsh's two-day testimony before Congress are likely to shape expectations for the Fed's policy path, with investors looking for greater clarity on the outlook for rates. The macro calendar is only half the story. Q2 earnings se…
❤5👍2🔥1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @QCPbroadcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 267,830 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“QCP Broadcast” (@QCPbroadcast), 13,633 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QCPbroadcast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.