Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

@iykyk

@iykyk

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,520subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001143934333
TypeChannel
Usernames@geishafeed @iykyk
Created22 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iykyk

Growth

3,5203,5323,5266 August 2026 — 3,532 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,532 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,530 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,529 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,520 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,520 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 7 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,518–3,534 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:043,520no change
12 Aug 2026, 19:383,520-9
9 Aug 2026, 19:513,529-1
9 Aug 2026, 13:013,530-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:353,532no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:273,532first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.4%
avg views ÷ 3,520 subscribers
Avg views / post
540
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (5 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,242
Reactions total63
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣3022.1%
👍2619.1%
custom 58032033704664139622115.4%
1611.8%
😢1410.3%
custom 5845740017896394081118.09%
👏64.41%
🤔64.41%
💩53.68%
🔥10.735%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC105 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

@iykyk

custom 58032033704664139626custom 58457400178963940811

Signed sid

31 Jul 2026, 22:15 UTC407 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I asked Meta to export my data, and inside 3gb of data I find this gem @iykyk

8👏3custom 58032033704664139623

Signed sid

29 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC467 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Very good article regarding buy backs and token models https://x.com/castle_labs/status/2082481445579407708?s=46 @iykyk

👍51

Signed sid

23 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC740 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

@iykyk

custom 5803203370466413962122🤣2

Signed sid

21 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC731 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Has been shared around a bit lately, because it's a very worthy read: https://www.scimitar.capital/p/the-jackpot-age @iykyk

👍4😢4🔥1

Signed sid

13 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC720 viewsread 7 August 2026

Gives perspective And sure there's nobody else like Saylor but in the end distribution is quite healthy overall

Signed sid

13 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC694 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

As of June 2026, individuals hold 66.1% of Bitcoin’s 21 million total supply. Businesses hold 7.8%, funds and ETFs hold 7.2%, and an estimated 7.7% is considered lost — link | AI comment | 1inch - Swap across chains at the best rates

👍5

Signed sid

9 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC767 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

@iykyk

custom 584574001789639408110

Signed sid

6 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC796 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Never sell *your* Bitcoin, is what he said Strategy sold 3588 BTC for $216M and has prepped for another $1B of selling in the near future https://cryptobriefing.com/strategy-sells-2225-bitcoin-as-q2-digital-asset-loss-hits-8-3-billion/ @iykyk

🤣8💩2

Signed sid

6 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC616 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

What’s the best privacy crypto?

  1. Monero62%
  2. Zcash19%
  3. Something else19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed sid

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @iykyk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTCAnonymous Poll53 voters

What’s the best privacy crypto?

  1. Monero62%
  2. Zcash19%
  3. Something else19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,124,677 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Wu Blockchain News
@wublockchainenglish · 254,073
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@iykyk” (@iykyk), 3,520 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iykyk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.