Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Stacy in Dataland (´⊙~⊙`)

@muur_posts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,233subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001993180528
TypeChannel
Username@muur_posts
DescriptionStacy Muur’s alpha channel. 𝕏: https://x.com/stacy_muur Blog: https://stacymuur.substack.com Chat: @muur_talks
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/muur_posts

Growth

8,2338,2518,2427 August 2026 — 8,251 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,251 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,233 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,230–8,254 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:038,233-18
7 Aug 2026, 04:458,251no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:338,251first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.51%
avg views ÷ 8,233 subscribers
Avg views / post
371
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.688%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 56 of 57 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held57 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total21,175
Reactions total143
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,150
Videos
9
Links
2,060

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

143 reactions across 56 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10472.7%
👍3323.1%
🔥42.80%
😘10.699%
😭10.699%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC127 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

The latest insights from the past week ↓ General ➖ Galaxy: Your Keys, Not Your Coins: Coldcard Wallets Hacked for $130m and Counting ➖ Galaxy: Weekly Research Brief: Coldcard Hacked; Bitcoin Price Resilient; Ethereum, Solana Reconsider Inflation Schedules Market ➖ CoinShares: Market update | August 7th, 2026 ➖ CoinShares: Equities update | August 7th, 2026 ➖ 4pillars: Fixed Rates Failed in the Past. Now, it has Rea

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC207 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Weak July jobs data continues to offset a hawkish Fed hold; BTC/ETH pull back Monday – Link After last week's surprise nonfarm payrolls decline (-23K vs. expectations for growth) and a Fed rate hold at 3.75%, crypto majors gave back some gains Monday. BTC fell to roughly $63,700 (-1.4%) and ETH dropped to ≈$1,858 (-3.4%) per CEX data. Matters because: July CPI data due Aug. 12 is the next major catalyst; a soft pri

1

12 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC244 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BlackRock says Bitcoin is decoupling from equities, calls sentiment shift "healthy" – Link BlackRock's Head of Digital Assets, Robert Mitchnick, said Bitcoin's correlation with U.S. stocks has weakened over the past month. He pointed to BTC outperforming during July's AI-stock pullback. Matters because: if the decoupling narrative holds, it can support Bitcoin's case as a portfolio diversifier and tail-risk hedge.

3

12 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC288 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

NYSE developing onchain settlement platform for tokenized securities – Link NYSE President Lynn Martin confirmed the exchange is building an onchain settlement platform for tokenized securities, following its participation in DTCC's tokenization pilot in July. Matters because: adding a major traditional exchange to tokenization infrastructure points to continued TradFi-DeFi convergence and could expand long-term de

1👍1

12 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC306 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Daily news snapshot: Altcoins 1. Chainlink (LINK): +5.52% (24h, OKX) • Market cap: ≈$6.56B • LINK outperformed the broader market after a wave of institutional integration announcements. Catalysts: • A live tokenized-securities trade with J.P. Morgan and CME processed via DTCC • BitGo's migration of $7.4B+ wrapped BTC to Chainlink CCIP • Robinhood adopting Chainlink as oracle infrastructure for its Robinhood Chain

2

11 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC381 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Bitcoin's rival BIP-110 minority chain stalls after mining only 2 blocks in 8 hours – Link The contested BIP-110 "anti-spam" proposal, which sought to restrict certain non-financial uses of Bitcoin block space, entered mandatory signaling with only ≈2.5% miner support. The resulting minority fork produced just two blocks before stalling. Matters because: this suggests Bitcoin's consensus mechanism remains resistant

2

11 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC374 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Strategy (MSTR) sells 1,690 BTC, builds cash buffer as CEO says "Bitcoin alone" isn't enough – Link Strategy reported selling 1,690 BTC (≈$109M) on Aug. 10, trimming holdings to 840,449 BTC, while CEO Phong Le said the firm now holds $4.75B in cash reserves and is pivoting toward a broader "digital credit" business model, including preferred stock products like STRC. Matters because: this signals Strategy is divers

2

11 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC387 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Senate pushes CLARITY Act vote to September, raising pass-or-fail stakes – Link The US Senate will not vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act before the August recess, pushing floor consideration to mid-September. A White House crypto advisor warned that if the bill does not advance before September 15, its chances of passing could drop sharply. Matters because: more regulatory uncertainty could push new inve

👍2

11 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC469 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Coinsbuy exchange drained of ≈$7.9–8M in coordinated TRON/Ethereum attack – Link Crypto payments platform Coinsbuy had wallets across Ethereum and TRON drained by a single actor, who routed stolen funds through FixedFloat toward Monero. Coinsbuy has offered a $100K bounty for information and says it will cover client losses. Matters because: infrastructure-level custody risk remains elevated even for established pa

1

11 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC375 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Tokenized RWA deposits in DeFi triple to $7.4B year-over-year – Link A CoinShares/Token Terminal report found tokenized real-world-asset deposits in DeFi lending and DEXs grew from $2.3B to $7.4B over the past year. The same backdrop included BlackRock launching two new tokenized money-market funds and Wells Fargo announcing tokenized deposits for corporate clients this fall. Matters because: this signals accelerat

11 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC341 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin spot ETFs post best weekly inflows since April; Monday closes with a $91M outflow – Link US spot Bitcoin ETFs took in roughly $854M over the prior five trading days (Aug 3–7), led by BlackRock's IBIT ($694M), while spot Ethereum ETFs added ≈$245M. That was the fifth straight week of net inflows for both. But on Aug. 10, BTC ETFs flipped to a $91M net outflow while ETH ETFs stayed marginally positive (+$5.3M)

👍1

11 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC324 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AI makes social activity easier, not obviously better This chart comes from a 2025 experimental study on generative AI in social media. Across Control, Chat, Conversation, Feedback, and Suggestions, mean responses stay close to neutral on four questions: comfort with AI on social platforms, joining online discussions, making discussions less toxic, and reducing polarization. The pattern is pretty consistent: Feedba

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @muur_posts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 445,783 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stacy in Dataland (´⊙~⊙`)” (@muur_posts), 8,233 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muur_posts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.