Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 55 days, net +45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,450–51,626 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Sept 2026, 21:01
51,522
-45
18 Sept 2026, 02:57
51,567
-15
15 Sept 2026, 19:38
51,582
+7
14 Sept 2026, 04:58
51,575
-7
12 Sept 2026, 15:42
51,582
-10
10 Sept 2026, 16:37
51,592
+1
7 Sept 2026, 10:16
51,591
-11
4 Sept 2026, 17:17
51,602
+3
1 Sept 2026, 21:57
51,599
-1
30 Aug 2026, 22:27
51,600
+2
30 Aug 2026, 00:54
51,598
+6
28 Aug 2026, 21:28
51,592
-14
27 Aug 2026, 17:57
51,606
+1
26 Aug 2026, 16:08
51,605
+8
25 Aug 2026, 18:02
51,597
+2
24 Aug 2026, 20:02
51,595
+29
23 Aug 2026, 04:12
51,566
-2
21 Aug 2026, 19:27
51,568
+1
20 Aug 2026, 16:56
51,567
+4
19 Aug 2026, 14:24
51,563
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.4%
avg views ÷ 51,522 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,600
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.192%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held
31 (27 July 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total
226,610
Reactions total
434
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 18:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
34s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
995 reactions across 31 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
629
63.2%
😱
161
16.2%
👍
143
14.4%
🔥
32
3.22%
🎉
23
2.31%
😁
6
0.603%
🤩
1
0.101%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 995 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Different estates, different character – all sharing a common foundation. 🏠
From the waterfront-mirroring hues of Berlayar Residences to the heritage-inspired features of Mount Pleasant Crest, every HDB project is designed to respond to its setting and take on an identity of its own.
Behind the scenes, HDB’s standardised unit plans provide architects with a tried-and-tested starting point for designing your home. K…
MacPherson Weave was built on a tight site next to an operating MRT station. The team also received the Construction Award for completing underground works early to free up space, using real-time monitoring to safeguard MRT infrastructure, and bringing in painting robots to enhance their productivity. The maze garden at the project features icons of MacPherson, such as the existing Pipit Road mini-dragon playground (…
At Costa Grove, located beside mangrove habitats in Pasir Ris, the construction team adapted its piling design and used smaller machinery to work around nearby trees to minimise impact from the development on the environment. For their efforts, they received the Construction Award this year. Fun fact: This BTO project has mangrove-themed playgrounds, with animals such as a lobster (featured) and mudskipper!
Over at Garden Vale @ Tengah, parts of the flats “pop out” from the blocks, giving the façades their distinctive 3D look for this Design Award winner. This comes from arranging different flat layouts in varying combinations across the blocks. Fellow winner Garden Vines @ Tengah was also designed the same way by the same team of architects.
At Toa Payoh Ridge, this Design Award winner sports a green-and-white façade that takes inspiration from rainwater flowing down the area's sloping terrain. You’ll also notice how the blocks step down in height towards the neighbouring low-rise homes.
What goes into an award-winning HDB project? Sometimes, it’s in the little details you might not notice at first glance, such as the façades, site layouts and flat designs 👀🏡
Check out what made these four projects stand out at this year’s HDB Awards, which are conferred on teams that have pushed the boundaries of design, construction and engineering when it comes to public housing.
Robots and smart technology are lending a hand at our BTO construction sites. 🏗️🤖
We’re stepping up the use of robotics and automation to take on repetitive and manpower-intensive work, helping our industry build more productively while maintaining quality.
One example is the Smart Passenger & Material (PM) Hoist, which workers can call directly to ferry workers and materials between floors. Instead of having one …
We started on our Construction Transformation Project in Tengah in 2022, to trial new and better ways to build our flats in the Garden Waterfront BTO projects. Think beam- and column-free flats for more flexible layouts, safer and more precise lifting of precast components, and even 3D-printed landscape structures.
The project has achieved the productivity targets we set, and some of the innovations have since been …
(2/2) We thank everyone who took the time to share their feedback, including nature groups representatives and biodiversity experts who were engaged prior to the publication of the EIA reports. Their valuable feedback included suggestions to strengthen ecological connectivity, integrate greenery with future developments, and minimise the potential impact on local biodiversity. We have taken these views into considera…
(1/2) To meet strong housing demand, we will be building more homes in the northern and western regions of Singapore. To guide our development plans for these areas, we conducted an environmental study for a site in Sembawang North bounded by Canberra Road, and a revalidation study for the future Tengah Town Centre site. We will develop these sites sensitively to minimise and mitigate the potential impact of developm…
❤10👍6😱6😁4
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @singaporeHDB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
You’ve booked your BTO. Now it’s time to sign the Agreement for Lease. Under the Staggered Downpayment Scheme(SDS), how much of your downpayment do you pay now?
Full downpayment5%
Lower now, the rest at key collection78%
Nothing, you pay it all at key collection17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
True or false? You must wait till you’re both working before applying for your BTO flat.
True8%
False92%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sqkii's Official Telegram Channel @sqkiisg · 49,338 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 25 August 2026
The Business Times @BizTimes · 46,386 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
dateideas by TOS 💕 @dateideas · 60,106 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 August 2026
gov.sg @Govsg · 238,946 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 11 August 2026
LTASingapore @LTASingapore · 36,060 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
EdgeProp SG @edgepropsg · 21,510 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 September 2026
Mothership @mothershipsg · 247,501 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 11 August 2026
Skills & Workforce Development Agency @Skills_Workforce_Development · 59,736 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
CPF Board @CPFBoard · 36,278 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 September 2026
Good-2-Go 🇸🇬 @good2gosg · 103,118 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 16 August 2026
Seedly Personal Finance SG @personalfinancesg · 51,009 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
SG Adulting 101 @sgadulting101 · 26,008 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 13 September 2026
TasteSoul 😋 @tastesoulsg · 84,512 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 18 August 2026
Good To Fly ✈️ @goodtofly · 80,126 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 18 August 2026
TheSmartLocal @TSLMedia · 46,240 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
SG Weekend Plans @sgweekend · 85,880 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
The Straits Times @TheStraitsTimes · 269,666 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 11 August 2026
ConfirmGood 🇸🇬 @confirmgood · 77,714 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 19 August 2026
SG Fitness & Health @sgfitnesshealth · 24,253 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 September 2026
Peach and Goma @peachandgoma · 27,182 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 September 2026
Eatbook @eatbooksg · 51,886 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 24 August 2026
Ministry of Health (MOH) Singapore @MOHsingapore · 21,220 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026
TODAY @todayonlinesg · 49,904 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 25 August 2026
CNA @cnalatest · 225,884 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HDB” (@singaporeHDB), 51,522 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/singaporeHDB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.