lookonchain: BlackRock has seen 4 consecutive trading days of $BTC net inflows, totaling 9,269 $BTC ($604M).

Channel
CT Live Feed (Automated)
@CTLIVEFEED
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
808subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001563460237 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CTLIVEFEED |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CTLIVEFEED |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 808 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 812 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:13 | 816 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 818 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 819 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 822 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 822 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
lookonchain: August 7 Update: #Bitcoin ETFs: 1D NetFlow: +1,673 $BTC(+$109.16M)🟢 7D NetFlow: +7,306 $BTC(+$476.7M)🟢 #Ethereum ETFs: 1D NetFlow: +42,756 $ETH(+$82.52M)🟢 7D NetFlow: +85,091 $ETH(+$164.22M)🟢 QT: Lookonchain (@lookonchain) August 6 Update: #Bitcoin ETFs: 1D NetFlow: +3,781 $BTC(+$243.49M)🟢 7D NetFlow: +9,034 $BTC(+$581.79M)🟢 #Ethereum ETFs: 1D NetFlow: +27,749 $ETH(+$52.91M)🟢 7D NetFlow: +40…
lookonchain: The 1600BTC-short trader closed another 500 $BTC ($32.58M) to avoid liquidation. The total loss has now exceeded $1.5M. Current position: 900 $BTC($58.6M) New liquidation price: $64,998.73
lookonchain: After a month of inactivity, Royal Government of Bhutan sold another 434.87 $BTC ($27.93M). arkm.com/explorer/addre…
lookonchain: Whales continue to accumulate $BTC. Another newly created wallet withdrew 434.87 $BTC($27.96M) from #Binance. arkm.com/explorer/addre…
lookonchain: The #Coldcard hacker, who stole 2,055 $BTC($130M), is active again. An hour ago, the hacker transferred 30.185 $BTC($1.94M) to a new wallet. arkm.com/explorer/addre…
lookonchain: Ethereum OG whale 0x7378 keeps buying $LIT. Over the past 2 months, the whale has spent a total of $9.1M to buy 3.91M $LIT at an average price of $2.33. debank.com/profile/0x7378…
lookonchain: The Jaredfromsubway exploiter is terrible at trading. A month ago, the exploiter stole $7.7M and swapped it for $ETH. The exploiter later sold 2,327 $ETH($3.94M) at $1,695, then bought back 2,063 $ETH($3.94M) at $1,912 10 hours ago. He lost 264 $ETH($505K).…
lookonchain: Pump fun(@Pumpfun) sold another 84,789 $SOL($6.25M) again today! In total, pump.fun has sold 4,823,325 $SOL($807M) at an average price of $167.4. arkm.com/explorer/entit…
lookonchain: Bitcoin mining companies are selling $BTC. MARA, which holds 36,303 $BTC($2.34B), deposited 200 $BTC($12.86M) into NYDIG 10 hours ago. Riot Platforms also continues to send $BTC to NYDIG, depositing another 381 $BTC($24.51M) 10 hours ago. arkm.com/explorer/entit……
cz_binance: 🇹🇭 Thailand confirms 0% capital gains tax on Bitcoin & crypto. 👏
cz_binance: RT Felix (@felix_fan) Standing in front of the Burj Khalifa again. Goosebumps. Around three years ago I was here talking to a crypto bro based in the UAE. He told me most of his friends use @TrustWallet. I said that was impossible. It lacked this feature, that chain, that polish. He just smiled and…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CTLIVEFEED. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@CTLIVEFEED named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@lokerfreshgrad · 29,138
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 8 September 2026
@wublockchainenglish · 236,023
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@cryptonarratives1 · 21,658
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
@NewListingsFeed · 59,209
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@marketsAlpha · 25,281
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
@infinityhedge · 45,864
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
@the_block_crypto · 25,027
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
@marketfeed · 38,760
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
@unfolded_defi · 21,811
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
@kirbycrypto · 39,913
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
@cryptogoodreads · 20,006
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CT Live Feed (Automated)” (@CTLIVEFEED), 808 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CTLIVEFEED.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.