Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

RaArΞs ⚓️ - Crypto Defi α

@RaAr3s

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19,917subscribers

-106 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001318781314
TypeChannel
Username@RaAr3s
DescriptionHey all and welcome ! I've started my crypto journey in 2014 and this is my public journal so I don’t forget the adventure. All I write here is personal opinion not financial advice. Dyor and be safe. @RaAres for any questions. https://x.com/RaAres
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RaAr3s

Growth

19,91720,02319,9706 August 2026 — 20,023 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,023 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,021 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,001 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,980 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,960 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,943 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,917 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,901–20,039 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:0719,917-26
11 Aug 2026, 02:4519,943-17
10 Aug 2026, 04:1119,960-20
9 Aug 2026, 03:0219,980-21
8 Aug 2026, 06:1620,001-20
7 Aug 2026, 02:5420,021-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:0020,023no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:5520,023first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.49%
avg views ÷ 19,917 subscribers
Avg views / post
296
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.933%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held23 (8 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total5,623
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,270
Videos
83
Links
1,450

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1648.5%
🤔515.2%
412.1%
👍412.1%
💯39.09%
🔥13.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC173 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Leopold’s wife 🤨 https://x.com/raares/status/2087257842277666829?s=46&t=YRVJ165QnuK60pysutBf1Q

😁2

6 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC262 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The Yen carry trade explained simple. https://x.com/RaAres/status/2085387195171455133?s=20 Wish you all a good day! 🚀

👍21

3 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC320 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

My thoughts on MSTR looking foward: https://x.com/RaAres/status/2084280828763254970?s=20 ✅ Wish you all a great day! 🚀

👍1

2 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC295 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Leaving this here as a lessonf or the future, I like Leopold I hope he gets from this stronger and wiser and will get his revenge back one day: https://x.com/RaAres/status/2083845386104447153?s=20 ✅ Wish you all a great Sunday!

🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC263 viewsread 12 August 2026

Seeing a lot of s—t about Saylor “intends to sell $5 bil of $BTC” such a bullshit, they twist the words and the plan: In short: The authorization exists and grants management the legal and corporate flexibility to sell Bitcoin for specific capital-management purposes. It is not a binding plan or requirement to sell any particular amount (including $5 billion). Actual sales remain discretionary and subject to managem

31 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC300 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

" Things may come to those who wait but only the things left by those who hustle." Leverage and greed as always, the root of all evil. Everyone is a genius in bull but if you dont leave the casino in time if you play markets like a casino, you know who will win in the end.

30 Jul 2026, 17:18 UTC265 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

A very useful project: Backpack https://x.com/RaAres/status/2082878113252266026?s=20 Wish you all a great day!

29 Jul 2026, 20:33 UTC304 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

SpaceX looks like Binance Alpha listing ngl as well. Gg elon for the biggest extraction in human history in that short time frame.

😁7

29 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC276 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Almost -50% in not even 20 days in Sandisk Corporation and they tell us Crypto is “risky”

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @RaAr3s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 702,674 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RaArΞs ⚓️ - Crypto Defi α” (@RaAr3s), 19,917 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RaAr3s.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.