🇰🇷 계좌 독립 만세!!! 머니서퍼와 함께, 내 계좌에도 광복을! 요즘같이 들쑥날쑥한 장 따라잡기는 머니서퍼만한 게 없다고 자부하는데요! 지금 물려있는 그 종목! 장 쉬는 이번 광복절 연휴, 머니서퍼와 함께 다시 전략 짜보세요 📌 머니서퍼 한 달 구독 45% 할인 📌 8/15(토) ~ 8/17(월), 연휴 3일 한정 📌 결제 선착순 815명 → 채우면 조기 마감 🎟 쿠폰코드: GWANGBOK815 다음 주 화요일 장 열리기 전에 준비해요! 👉 지금 쿠폰 등록하기 [링크]

Channel
특징주 레이더
@characteristicstock
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14,236subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001266442206 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @characteristicstock |
| Created | 10 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/characteristicstock |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 14,236 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 14,240 | -11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 14,251 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 14,255 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 14,259 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 14,265 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 14,258 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 14,259 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 14,261 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 14,261 | first reading |
Engagement
169 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.85%
- avg views ÷ 14,236 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 548
- 169 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 169
- of 169 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 169 (7 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 92,644 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
[미국 특징주] "애플, 알리바바 손잡고 중국 전용 자체 AI 모델 훈련" https://www.newspim.com/news/view/20260814000829
[특징주] 현대차, 제네시스 하이브리드 출시 기대감에 '강세' https://www.cstimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=716918
[특징주] LG전자, 구광모·젠슨 황, 'AI 협력' 강화에 '강세' https://www.asiatime.co.kr/article/20260814500133
[특징주] 외국인 '한화생명' 기관 '한화오션' 러브콜...'삼성전자'는 동... https://www.newstnt.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=713937 [특징주] 센서뷰, 한화시스템과 11.7억 규모 공급계약 체결 https://www.newstnt.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=713966
[특징주] 농심, 해외사업 호조에 상반기 영업익 32%↑…공시 후 11%대 급... https://www.namdonews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=920086
[ET특징주] '백종원' 더본코리아, 해외사업 확장 소식에 기대감… 주가... https://www.etnews.com/20260814000176
[특징주] 삼기, 현대차 '로봇 대전' 본격화…'휴머노이드 프레임 공급' ... http://www.newsprime.co.kr/news/article.html?no=743949
[특징주] SK케미칼, 2분기 호실적에 13%대 강세…분기 최대 매출 https://www.ebn.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=1720437
[특징주] 피엔티, 9천795만원 규모 자사주 취득 결정 https://www.newstnt.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=713964
[특징주] LG전자, 구광모·젠슨황 회동 임박 영향 '상승' https://www.jeonmae.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=1284116
[특징주] 한화오션, 美 함정 건조시장 개방 기대에 4%↑ https://www.newsworks.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=850399
Showing the 12 most recent of 169 posts we hold for @characteristicstock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 276,886 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“특징주 레이더” (@characteristicstock), 14,236 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/characteristicstock.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.