$SAGENT just broke out HARD & went absolutely parabolic. $47K → $1.3M in a single God Candle, that's a massive 2700% (28x) profit so far. Been holding this for nearly a month and kept telling people not to fade it. The reason was simple: doxxed dev + nonstop building, regardless of price action & market conditions,Now the chart is doing the talking. Never ever fade Gem 💎 again. https://x.com/Cryptoo_Gems/status/…

Channel
Crypto Gem💎 Signals
@Crypto_GemSignals
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,403subscribers
-128 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001724490724 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Crypto_GemSignals |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Crypto_GemSignals |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 8,403 | -19 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 8,422 | -9 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 8,431 | -12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:14 | 8,443 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 8,442 | +10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 8,432 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 8,444 | -16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 8,460 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:59 | 8,470 | -22 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 8,492 | -24 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 8,516 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 8,528 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 8,531 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 8,531 | first reading |
Engagement
101 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 101 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 15s
- Average length
- 34s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
This is big for $HEDGE 🔥 @Hedgetradex just partnered with @buildaureon to bring real-time agentic rebalancing to prediction markets. Set your portfolio weights, trade macro events and let AI dynamically manage your collateral. Dev is cooking hard af & this could explode anytime like $AUREON. The first Prediction Trading Layer to Robinhood. 0x48DCA2206189013Fa50b9b2C38233B9363d72bD9 https://x.com/Cryptoo_Gems/st…
$SAGENT just secured patternership with @intel This could send wild anytime https://x.com/AgentOS_Tech/status/2093281696204398655
Keep eyes on $ZYBER 👀 it started moving. 100k soon⏳
Most people still see prediction markets as betting but I see a new trading primitive being built. $HEDGE @HedgeApp is bringing a Prediction Trading Layer to Robinhood, turning real-world events into live, tradable markets with probabilities, liquidity, and a familiar trading experience. The bigger thesis is simple: Information becomes an asset when people can trade their conviction around it. I wouldn’t be surpr…
Next is $HEDGE, if anyone missed $AUREON don't miss this one
$AUREON is going vertical 🔥 1600% (27x) 👌
Will drop a detailed thread soon⏳
Just aped $HEDGE The Prediction Trading Layer on Robinhood. It's Rh szn & this one has all the right ingredients to become next big cook. Ca: 0x48DCA2206189013Fa50b9b2C38233B9363d72bD9 #dyor #nfa
https://x.com/ZyberSecAi/status/2092643849915306418
Aped a bag of $ZYBER 0x1e776F23f9849B40f37820c9CA86Aee59cD27777 #dyor #nfa
$AOS cooking big🔥 @AgentOS_RH just introduced private memory layer to flag and filter sensitive data during inference for non-owners only They also partnered with @buildaureon to bring its financial intelligence toolkit directly into AgentOS as a native toolset. AI agents + persistent memory + privacy + financial intelligence. The stack they’re building is getting serious. Wouldn’t be surprised to see this push i…
Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @Crypto_GemSignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Crypto_GemSignals edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 19 August 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@aeterna_agent · 447 postsFunny world😂😄
@life360 · 423 postsØ 𝗥 𝗩 𝗜 𝗫 🩶
@ORVIXHQ · 2012 postsStocksBack | Portal
@StocksBack · 572 postsMajor Buy Bot | @MajorBuyBot
@MajorBuyBot · 46,9591 postMetroPay
@metrpay · 131 postNVIDIA
@NVIDIA · 6,9271 postSushiSwap [Official]
@sushiswap · 1,5061 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 6
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 6
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Crypto_GemSignals named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 12 posts, 8 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 23 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@wazobiacryptoo · 77,293
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
@crypto_pumps_binance · 76,308
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
@bitcoinhabebeTG · 23,574
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
@pumpleaks · 20,832
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 September 2026
@cryptopumps · 42,365
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@datadikdasmen · 61,254
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
@dadpumps · 26,240
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
@KucoinPumpChannel · 43,031
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
@Kucoin_Binance_Pumps · 85,928
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
@infowebinarpendidikan · 42,782
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 28 August 2026
@inside_calls · 25,082
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Gem💎 Signals” (@Crypto_GemSignals), 8,403 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_GemSignals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.