It was obvious for $BTC to take mFVG at ~69K eventually, now we're retesting bear market resistance band That's where we reject and go lower https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2090138700009075052
✍4🔥4🤔3

Channel
@kinoyg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,943subscribers
-103 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001660941553 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kinoyg |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kinoyg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 6,943 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 6,956 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 6,974 | -15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 6,989 | -18 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:39 | 7,007 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 7,025 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 7,037 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 7,046 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (23 July 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,931 |
| Reactions total | 283 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
358 reactions across 40 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✍ | 133 | 37.2% | |
| 🔥 | 119 | 33.2% | |
| 🤔 | 105 | 29.3% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.279% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 358reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kinoyg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
It was obvious for $BTC to take mFVG at ~69K eventually, now we're retesting bear market resistance band That's where we reject and go lower https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2090138700009075052
✍4🔥4🤔3
Compression -> Deviation -> Dump -> Repeat $BTC https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2089463770074550399
✍2🔥2🤔2
Interesting divergence here... $BTC Open interest is at a 1-year breakout while price remains inside same compressed range Wouldn't be surprised to see a leverage flush into compression before the move toward mFVG above https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2089411950073528637
✍2🔥2🤔2
$BTC POC is sitting at 64K with volume increasing at highs of this 2-month compressed range That tells us we're seeing acceptance near range highs Which on LTF points to a retest of mFVG, with or without taking OB or compression below first https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2089344533867745314
✍2🔥2🤔2
We’ve just closed 5th $BTC weekly candle around the same weekly 200MA, all within a ~4% range This usually means a large liquidity sweep is coming https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2089114708540371240
✍3🔥3🤔3
For those bottom-is-in thinkers.. $BTC If you're waiting for Q4 for bottom to come quietly, without any final flush and legacy market correction It's not a plan, it's just a comfortable bottom for you We're sitting at -50% from ATH, no fear, no capitulation, no "we are going to zero" sentiment, anywhere close to 2022 No macro bottom ever comes this easy At some point, S&P 500 must correct and if BTC is already t…
🔥3✍2🤔2
Decided to check LTF and saw we formed a bearish H&S pattern You all know what's coming next... $BTC Get ready for a further dump https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2088399460619501985
🔥2🤔2✍1
$BTC From a purely structural standpoint, there's nothing bullish right now except monthly imbalance above We're just ranging and clearly targeting liquidity on both sides So after it happens there, it's just free fall https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2088322187891478985
🔥4🤔2
The final capitulation is coming. $BTC https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2087603792611082687
🔥6✍2🤔2
2 of 2 last CPIs got us a ~7% $BTC pump We would have third one today Wondering if we repeat it https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2087516084010176686
🔥2🤔2✍1
It was always obvious in hindsight... $BTC People just don't want to believe it's happening And eventually, when everyone realizes it was playing out all along, it'll already be gone https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2086936467410968968
✍4🔥3🤔3
Are you still bullish... $BTC We didn't manage to flip the 65.3K weekly high, got rejected from it, and are now moving to test another pivot at 62.7K If this one fails too, I'd expect price to clear compression below That puts 59K-60K as next target https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2086878364279751153
✍4🔥2🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @kinoyg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Symbiote🕷” (@kinoyg), 6,943 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kinoyg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.