Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for APES by DEG APE

Channel

APES by DEG APE

@deg_apes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,930subscribers

+46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002141007772
TypeChannel
Username@deg_apes
DescriptionCommunity of savvy degens to learn, share, and ape alphas to make generational wealth. Nothing I share is financial advice. Requests: @Deg_ape_G Alt account: @Deg_Ape_OG
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/deg_apes

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,8826,9786,9307 August 2026 — 6,884 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,884 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,882 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,898 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,906 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,903 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,897 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,923 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,953 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,976 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,977 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,946 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,970 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,967 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,951 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,978 subscribers10 October 2026 — 6,976 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,973 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,972 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,977 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,964 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,970 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,978 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,960 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,943 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,930 subscribers7 August 20268 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 93 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,868–6,992 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 18:476,930-13
5 Nov 2026, 05:556,943-17
2 Nov 2026, 06:286,960-18
30 Oct 2026, 03:566,978+8
27 Oct 2026, 03:366,970+6
23 Oct 2026, 17:276,964-13
20 Oct 2026, 23:576,977+5
17 Oct 2026, 21:166,972-1
14 Oct 2026, 13:566,973-3
10 Oct 2026, 18:216,976-2
4 Oct 2026, 20:566,978+27
25 Sept 2026, 14:186,951-16
15 Sept 2026, 03:206,967-3
11 Sept 2026, 19:376,970+24
6 Sept 2026, 21:216,946-31
2 Sept 2026, 13:146,977+1
30 Aug 2026, 04:046,976+23
27 Aug 2026, 03:136,953+30
24 Aug 2026, 08:446,923+26
20 Aug 2026, 09:146,897first reading

Engagement

141 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.67%
avg views ÷ 6,930 subscribers
Avg views / post
462
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 141 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 57 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held141 (30 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total26,790
Reactions total1,882
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 16:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,700
Videos
≈53
Links
≈426

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 47s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,156 reactions across 138 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,81835.3%
🎉1,20923.4%
❤1,06420.6%
👍95618.5%
⚡631.22%
🙉310.601%
💊150.291%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 138 of the 141 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 139 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @deg_apes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 141 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 59 posts held from the last 30 days (6.78%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC100 views1 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Bitcoin falls below $73,000 Solana finding tough to hodl the 80s ALTs getting absolutely cooked but "we are fine, TEXCAT is fine" just one more night, and we will fix it fr

👍1

10 Nov 2026, 15:04 UTC163 views5 reactionsread 10 November 2026

btw make make sure you are following me on FOMO you can track my lives positions and trades here lets cook 🔥 https://fomo.family/profile/deg_ape?r=deg_ape

❤3👍2

10 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC203 views34 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

bought the bag of $TEXCAT on FOMO this lore is very relatable to us degens. "a cowboy cat sitting alone at 3 AM, watching the city and pretending everything is fine" bad day, red PF, or a chud life. Cat has the same answer "I'm fine" TEXCAT was created by Numan, same guy behind $Swordcat and Apeonfon. It has already pulled over 10M+ views on X. we've all been Texcat at some point. chart is slowly bouncing back. …

🔥21🎉13

10 Nov 2026, 07:53 UTC286 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

$PEPETIDE wants to run back into millions we've seen what happened when $MEME got paired with tokenized AMC. now $PEPETIDE is playing a similar game with $PTN, which is an actual biotech company with an ~$11M market cap. around 1/3 of the on-chain Palatin stock supply is sitting inside Pepetide's launch curve. the potential short squeeze is coming soon...

👍3

9 Nov 2026, 19:21 UTC380 viewsread 10 November 2026
Poll

are you bullish on $CATE???

  1. fkn yes 🚀31%
  2. hell nahh 🥶22%
  3. just in watchlist 👀29%
  4. idgaf 😒18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Nov 2026, 19:20 UTC367 views5 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

$CATE ROUND 3 ⏳ what do you think fam???

❤4💊1

9 Nov 2026, 19:15 UTC368 views2 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

bought a bag of $pepetide at $600k mc its paired with the $PTN, which is a pharma stock sitting around $11M mc, and there's a potential short squeeze narrative building around it. like imagine a memecoin bringing attention to a tiny pharma stock and triggering a whole narrative peptides + $PEPE + stock meta dyor lads 22JKmY9YZfnQfb3pGYb6hctL5Jyvv3zhL3nQ8oyNuoYp

❤2

9 Nov 2026, 12:04 UTC387 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

big week ahead for the $GATO believers GTA6 launch is merely 10 days away and whole attention is now shifting towards GTA6 narrative tokens. $GATO is frontrunning this narrative rn Once it enters the price discovery mode, we will see thicc FOMO candles driving this past 20M - 30M stay positioned in fam

⚡3

9 Nov 2026, 11:47 UTC369 views2 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

G morning lads looks like a shaky start to this week. One thing to notice that Bitcoin has lost its $76,000 support lets watch for some solid runners in the trenches we gonna eat good this week 🔥

❤1👍1

8 Nov 2026, 19:36 UTC454 views44 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

$CATPAD just clicked $300k mc this is now the perfect platform for creators to launch more cat memes, projects and bring the OG vibes back millions loading in for $CATPAD believers 🚀

🔥24🎉17❤3

8 Nov 2026, 16:11 UTC456 views40 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

50% up in $GEORGE ⚡️ the pfp cult era is coming back into trenches send this higher

🔥22🎉18

Showing the 12 most recent of 141 posts we hold for @deg_apes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Nov 2026, 19:21 UTCAnonymous Poll78 voters

are you bullish on $CATE???

  1. fkn yes 🚀31%
  2. hell nahh 🥶22%
  3. just in watchlist 👀29%
  4. idgaf 😒18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTCAnonymous Poll92 voters

will $CATE break $100M tonight???

  1. Yes 🔥40%
  2. Nahh, its done 🙈47%
  3. maybe 👀17%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🐧Dippy Alpha Calls
@dippy_calls · 24,189
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
Insider Calls
@inside_calls · 24,896
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“APES by DEG APE” (@deg_apes), 6,930 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deg_apes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.