Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Басов про стартапы

Channel

Басов про стартапы

@zeroton

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,070subscribers

-566 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001465103078
TypeChannel
Username@zeroton
Created24 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/zeroton

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 4 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@whackdoor/303285 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC@zeroton/8611 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC0.991.6 hours
@whackdoor/303204 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC@zeroton/8610 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC0.9916 minutes
@whackdoor/303576 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC@zeroton/8617 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC0.9968 minutes
@whackdoor/302532 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC@zeroton/8600 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC0.986.1 hours
@whackdoor/303415 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC@zeroton/8614 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC0.9887 minutes
@whackdoor/302673 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC@zeroton/8603 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC0.9823 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@whackdoor7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9887 minutes@whackdoor (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 4 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @whackdoor. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 4 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

24,07024,63624,3536 August 202611 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -566. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,985–24,721 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 04:2224,070-9
9 Nov 2026, 11:3724,079-8
8 Nov 2026, 06:2024,087-8
6 Nov 2026, 21:4124,095-7
5 Nov 2026, 21:4624,102-6
4 Nov 2026, 22:5924,108+4
4 Nov 2026, 00:2824,104-3
3 Nov 2026, 03:1124,107-10
2 Nov 2026, 03:2724,117-3
1 Nov 2026, 05:0124,120-3
31 Oct 2026, 01:3024,123-7
30 Oct 2026, 00:2924,130-5
28 Oct 2026, 21:3024,135-5
27 Oct 2026, 20:1024,140-4
26 Oct 2026, 20:3924,144-13
25 Oct 2026, 19:2624,157-2
24 Oct 2026, 18:5924,159-5
23 Oct 2026, 19:5824,164-8
22 Oct 2026, 20:3024,172-12
21 Oct 2026, 17:3124,184first reading

Engagement

234 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 129 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.85%
avg views ÷ 24,070 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
87 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
87
of 234 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held234 (31 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total101,498
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 22:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
55m 12s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 83 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Advertising

Ad load
0.427%
1 of 234 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
837
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,180
over 233 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwL3mGF112 August 202612 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 234 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 87 posts held from the last 30 days (1.15%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 17:05 UTC451 viewsread 10 November 2026
Video

Google убила конкурентов — Gemini 4 Carbon уже доступна. Компания релизнула настоящего монстра, который превосходит конкурентов по большинству бенчей. Освежим память: • Моделька заняла первое место в Artificial Analysis V5 и мощно качнулась в кодинге, кибербезопасности и работе с длинными, многосоставными задачами. • Набрала 71% на CWE-bench, 65% на Terminal-Bench 4.0 и 96% на GraphWalks при работе с контекстом до …

10 Nov 2026, 15:12 UTC625 viewsread 10 November 2026
Video

GTA 6 — вышел новый трейлер, посвященный старту предзагрузки. Ждём разборы под лупой на 3 часа.

10 Nov 2026, 14:33 UTC657 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Вот, как на самом деле работает ChatGPT. Расскажите всем.

10 Nov 2026, 08:21 UTC922 viewsread 10 November 2026
Video

Fable 5.2 уничтожила геймдев — новый монстр от Anthropic создает шедевральные игры за считанные часы. Да, то, над чем студии трудятся годами (!), теперь вылетает у обычных работяг буквально за несколько промптов. Главное, продумать сюжет, текстуры, экспозицию и механики, чтобы просто так не жечь токены. • Прямо на ваших глазах чел сгенерил полноценный шутер уровня CoD или Battlefield за восемь часов! Осталось прора…

9 Nov 2026, 19:23 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Срочный сбор: Сэму Альтману нужна ваша помощь

9 Nov 2026, 18:44 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 10 November 2026
Video

Жесть: дрозофила заставили 31 час без перерыва смотреть курсы по C++, чтобы превратить насекомое в ультимативного кодера. Хуже пытки не придумаешь.

9 Nov 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Beget будет жить — разрабы вышли на связь и уже договариваются о сроках возобновления аккредитации по доменам .RU, .SU и .РФ. Вместе с КЦ, РосНИИРОС и ТЦИ мы согласовали план возобновления аккредитации. Сейчас мы идём по этому плану и работаем над тем, чтобы аккредитация и доступ к управлению доменами вернулись в ближайшее время. Самое главное: все домены в безопасности! Компания договорилась перенести аннулировани…

9 Nov 2026, 13:27 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 10 November 2026
Video

Сердечки вместо кружочков могут появиться в Telegram — команда мессенджера показала новый концепт видеосообщений. Нам это надо!

9 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

NVIDIA дропнули новый чип. Это имба. Расскажите всем.

6 Nov 2026, 15:46 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 10 November 2026
Video

Лол, вайбкодер добавил в Elden Ring Райдена из Metal Gear Rising вместе с той самой легендарной механикой расчленения. Теперь играбельно.

6 Nov 2026, 11:35 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Paint взломали — и через него могут удалённо получить доступ к вашему ПК. Да, это не шутка. • В самом простеньком редакторе нашли уязвимость на 8.1 балла. • Самое смешное — уязвимость позволяет запускать код на вашем ПК через сеть (!), и да, у Paint почему-то есть доступ в сеть. • Уязвимость пофиксили, но обнову не смогли загрузить в Microsoft Store. Как проверить и защитить свой комп от дырявого Paint — открываем …

6 Nov 2026, 08:24 UTC≈1,340 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Epic Games раздаёт бесплатно всю библиотеку Quixel Megascans — больше 20 тысяч фотореалистичных 3D-моделей, текстур и материалов для игр и визуализаций. Ассеты будут постепенно становиться бесплатными до 12 ноября. А тем, кто покупал их с января 2025 года, вернут деньги на баланс Epic Games. Вишенка сверху — материалы теперь можно использовать для обучения ИИ-моделей. Epic купила Quixel ещё в 2019-м, и вот спустя с…

Showing the 12 most recent of 234 posts we hold for @zeroton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @zeroton as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
20 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,538,229
#1
лидер мнений среди удобрений
@lider · 175,531
#2
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,022,997
#3
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,540
#4
Мое Образование
@moe_obrazovanie · 225,032
#5
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 140,753
#6
Код.ру
@d_code · 405,444
#7
TrendWatching
@trendwatching24 · 1,375,035
#8
Rozetked
@rozetked · 646,921
#9
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 968,108
#10
vc.ru
@vcnews · 112,144
#11
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,546
#12
Марзаганов вещает
@marzaganoff · 73,761
#13
The Edinorog 🦄
@Theedinorogblog · 44,082
#14
Стартап дня. Александр Горный.
@startupoftheday · 62,560
#15
бумеры смотрят телек
@boomers_TV · 156,897
#16
Дизраптор
@disruptors_official · 72,494
#17
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 124,950
#18
kyrillic
@kyrillic · 61,235
#19
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,780
#20
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика
@temno · 79,175
#21
Стартапная | Тренды и бизнес
@startapnaya · 56,883
#22
Ты в тренде или уходи
@trendsetter · 1,504,263
#23
1337
@media1337 · 1,103,517
#24
Игорь, начинайте работу
@oplata_skoro_budet · 645,495
#25
Креатив со звездочкой
@creative · 133,469
#26
Сегодня в тренде
@trends · 1,112,806
#27
Рестарт
@remedia · 667,251
#28
CodeCamp
@codecamp · 177,629
#29
Neural Shit
@NeuralShit · 54,643
#30
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного
@aioftheday · 44,602
#31
Proeconomics
@proeconomics · 68,730
#32
Не баг, а фича
@bugfeature · 552,118
#33
42 секунды
@ftsec · 19,390
#34
Бесплатное образование
@free_edu · 306,697
#35
UX Live 🔥
@uxlive · 36,198
#36
Венчур в картинках
@ventureinpics · 11,272
#37
Малоизвестное интересное
@theworldisnoteasy · 74,298
#38
Русский ритейл и бизнес
@retailrus · 281,555
#39
Лекториум
@lektorium20 · 114,343
#40
TechSparks
@techsparks · 46,736
#41
Боги маркетинга
@Godketing · 111,753
#42
Грокс
@groks · 42,476
#43
олдскульный маркетинг
@marketingold · 122,984
#44
Хулиномика
@hoolinomics · 98,609
#45
Not Boring Tech
@notboring_tech · 21,122
#46
Партизанский Маркетинг
@GuerrillaMarketing · 105,260
#47
Максим Спиридонов
@mspiridonov · 69,790
#48
О Бизнесе
@business_ru · 50,480
#49
Шесят Шестой
@shesyat_shestoi · 7,448
#50
Инвест ревью | Финансы
@investorbiz · 123,984
#51
Алексей ∅ Стаценко | строим Мир Полудня
@winbytranscending · 1,732
#52
Нейродвиж
@neuraldvig · 288,660
#53
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436
#54
Двач
@dvachannel · 969,331
#55
Банкста
@banksta · 439,838
#56
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,557,057
#57
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 461,970
#58
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 664,380
#59
Не баг, а фича
@bugnotfeature · 1,161,851
#60
addmeto
@addmeto · 72,001
#61
эйай ньюз
@ai_newz · 98,262
#62
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 341,015
#63
Передали коллегам
@collegi · 134,238
#64
Сиолошная
@seeallochnaya · 81,254
#65
Лепра
@Lepragram · 340,793
#66
Метаверсище и ИИще
@cgevent · 53,591
#67
CMD — полезные сервисы для жизни и работы
@cmd_cv · 53,254
#68
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinopoisk · 794,552
#69
Баррель черной икры
@banki_oil · 543,928
#70
Сергей Минаев
@minaevlife · 317,691
#71
дедлайн вчера
@skip_deadline · 20,114
#72
Fucking English | Английский 18+
@fuckingenglish · 307,122
#73
Толкователь
@tolk_tolk · 126,403
#74
ок, согласовано
@notypicmarketing · 707,978
#75
украла авокадо с фотостоков
@mavacado · 42,250
#76
Forbes Russia
@forbesrussia · 235,497
#77
Беспощадный пиарщик
@prbezposhady · 151,204
#78
headlines
@headlines_for_traders · 114,637
#79
Лучшие вакансии
@vacanciesbest · 162,821
#80
Share
@sharemed · 215,525
#81
НЕЗЫГАРЬ
@russicaru · 417,710
#82
Русский венчур
@rusven · 24,986
#83
Банкофф - Финансы
@bankoffo · 199,482
#84
bitkogan
@bitkogan · 257,290
#85
Зашкваркетинг
@dankmarketing · 58,627
#86
Книги | Аудиокниги
@flibusta_anglysky · 366,343
#87
Оправдания для заказчика
@olegizvini · 32,634
#88
Экономика
@economika · 146,280
#89
Сосисочная
@sosicka · 157,518
#90
Трендоскоп
@trendoscope · 4,902
#91
Naked Science
@nsmag · 245,244
#92
I’m CEO, beach
@imceobeach · 64,945
#93
MISTER SOSISTER ~ PRAYING FOR EXITS
@mister_sosister · 16,331
#94
ЖЮ 🧡 Videos
@lifeyt · 326,954
#95
Деньги в банке
@bankser · 127,640
#96

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КиберПанк | Технологии Будущего | Technology
@technology_future_cyberpunk · 37,174
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Мое Образование
@moe_obrazovanie · 225,032
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Витрина стартапов
@showstartup · 26,848
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
Стартап на завтрак
@startup_club24 · 74,944
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
Книги и Аудиокниги | Флибуста
@skachat_chitat_besplatno · 88,835
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 August 2026
Скиллгет | Онлайн образование
@skillget · 79,532
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Сила Книги | Аудиокниги | Flibusta
@silaknigi · 121,965
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
БИЗНЕС ИДЕИ
@idei_biznes · 26,681
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
Коэффициент Продуктивности
@productivity_Q · 26,511
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MoSHE)
@MinistryoSHE · 78,698
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 September 2026
Богатый сосед
@BigBrains · 62,764
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Словарный запас | Саморазвитие
@slovar_psikhologia · 82,968
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Басов про стартапы” (@zeroton), 24,070 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zeroton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.