Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

commit -m "better"

@itpgchannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,606subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001567842955
TypeChannel
Username@itpgchannel
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/itpgchannel

Growth

3,5983,6063,6026 August 2026 — 3,599 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,598 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,601 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,606 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,597–3,607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:153,606+5
9 Aug 2026, 21:523,601+3
6 Aug 2026, 23:263,598-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:213,599first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.1%
avg views ÷ 3,606 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,730
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held27 (30 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total46,793
Reactions total1,636
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,374 reactions across 23 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁39128.5%
🔥37026.9%
🤡1359.83%
1319.53%
👍1027.42%
💩775.60%
🐳392.84%
🤣372.69%
💯181.31%
🎉161.16%
👏141.02%
💊100.728%
🆒50.364%
🤩50.364%
😇40.291%
👎30.218%
😱30.218%
🤔30.218%
👾20.146%
😐20.146%
7 further kinds70.509%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,636reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC718 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

причем я сам попросил - лень идти за totp

👏4🤡3🐳2🔥1😁1

7 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC943 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

О, и антропики до этого догадались!

🔥24🤡1

7 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC972 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#perf - это состояние души. Например, когда github actions тебе дает 20 джобов по 4 ядра на Linux, и 5 джобов по 3 ядра на macos, то ты делаешь так, чтобы эта халява никогда не простаивала! Хорошо иметь свою систему сборки https://t.me/itpgchannel/4282, в условном meson/cmake хрен бы так легко попилил свой CI.

💯10🔥7🤡7👾21

7 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,150 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://github.com/pg83/shitty/releases TL;DR - новый релиз #shitty: * sixels * табы preview, пока без UI вкладок, только возможность создавать и переключаться между ними с клавиатуры

8🔥5😱3👍2🤡1🤣1

7 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈1,160 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#trustme Получилось порядка 17к тестов (на КДПВ 10к нод, иногда нода больше одного теста). На старте trustme (бывший #mrustc) проходил только 2/3 из них, сейчас, после суток пыхтения, и фикса порядка 150 (!!!) багов, проходит уже 3/4. И это я еще не прогнал его с санитайзерами на полном корпусе тестов. В целом, не умаляя заслуг его автора (а он проделал титанический труд), это довольно много говорит о качестве кода

15🔥8👍2🤡1

6 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC≈1,510 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чтобы запустить autoresearch для #trustme, нужен очень плотный корпус тестов, с целевой метрикой "сократи количество fail". В https://t.me/itpgchannel/4296 писал, как я "ограбил опенсорс", чтобы соорудить свой монструозный корпус тестов для #shitty. Прямо сейчас снова граблю опенсорс, на этот раз тащу к себе самые разнообразные тесты на компилятор rust! https://github.com/pg83/trustme/blob/master/PLAN.md - вот пла

🔥23😁17👍8🤡52👀1

6 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,560 views85 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.opennet.ru/opennews/art.shtml?num=66036 TL;DR - Rust запретили AI в разработке. Запретили и запретили, долбоебы и долбоебы, кто бы сомневался. Но у меня под это дело как раз есть анонс нового проекта! Думаю, вы заметили, что мне нравятся всякие autoresearch #LLM штуки, типа моего #shitty, это когда я краду 5000 тестов на терминал в opensource, а потом говорю клоде "повтори"! https://t.me/itpgchannel/42

🤡29🔥25😁157👍4🐳31🆒1

6 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC≈1,610 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А вот и шелл для #shitty подоспел!

😁40🔥11🤩42💯1

6 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC≈1,250 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tech_b0lt_Genona

Четверг, а значит время проектов от подписчиков! 🌝 Тем, кто пропустил, что такое четверговые проекты от подписчиков, можно прочитать тут - https://t.me/tech_b0lt_Genona/4983 Слово автору @sowound --- Зачастую у софта практически нет никакого UX. Если в скрипте ошибка, то желаю тебе удачи в попытках понять, откуда она вообще взялась. Для Windows буквально нет ни одной bash-совместимой оболочки, а powershell — это

😁27💩10👍7🤔31

5 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,690 views111 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Выпустил новый релиз #shitty - https://github.com/pg83/shitty/releases! Всякие мелочи: * лигатуры и поддержка всратых Nerd иконок * toml config * произвольные переопределения кейбиндов * 1200 цветовых тем, цельнотянутых из iterm, #kitty, #alacritty, и везде, где нашел * фиксы и оптимизации Но самое важное в этом релизе, что я таки пошел на поводу у тех, кому не нравится название #shitty! Теперь в репозитории живу

😁5519🤡9🔥8👍7💩6🐳3💯3

4 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC≈1,610 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @seeallochnayaPhoto

Число сообщений о серьезных киберуязвимостях продолжает расти. В июле 21 крупная технологическая организация опубликовала около 2500 CVE высокой и критической степени серьезности — примерно в 5 раз больше, чем ежемесячный рекорд до анонса Claude Mythos Preview. Источник

🤡12👍8🔥42🤩1

4 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC≈1,740 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Публикация на opennet порадовала меня уж лишь тем, как там корежило копилефтоблядей #GNU, любо-дорого!

😁31🤡196💊5🔥3👍2😐2🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @itpgchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 158,090 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“commit -m "better"” (@itpgchannel), 3,606 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itpgchannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.