Channel
@dubaispetskor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,590subscribers
+33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001644841621 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dubaispetskor |
| Description | Праздные заметки от москвички, понаехавшей в Дубай UAE adv permit: 3309461 Для связи @nzozhnik_bot |
| Created | 29 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dubaispetskor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 9,590 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 9,596 | +21 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 9,575 | +24 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 9,551 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 9,557 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (30 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 44,660 |
| Reactions total | 1,326 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,326 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 669 | 50.5% | |
| 😁 | 193 | 14.6% | |
| 👍 | 189 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 77 | 5.81% | |
| 🤣 | 56 | 4.22% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 1.96% | |
| 😢 | 26 | 1.96% | |
| 👀 | 25 | 1.89% | |
| 💯 | 19 | 1.43% | |
| 💔 | 10 | 0.754% | |
| 🤡 | 9 | 0.679% | |
| 😨 | 7 | 0.528% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 0.452% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 0.302% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 0.302% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.226% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.075% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.075% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.075% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Спецкор не любит быть вестником апокалипсиса, с этим и без него все прекрасно справляются. Поэтому пытается чередовать плохие новости региона с хорошими. Сначала плохие. Для индустрии туризма и путешествий. Ожидается, что эта индустрия во всех странах Залива потеряет 137 000 рабочих мест в этом году из-за конфликта с Ираном. Прогнозируется, что занятость в шести странах Залива сократится на 4,3% с 3,2 миллиона ра…
❤41👍18🔥7😁6👎1
В национальной прессе разъяснили, как будет осуществляться плата за музыку и указали конкретные цифры. Ознакомимся. Платить придется от 1500 до 50 000 дирхамов в год Ежегодные сборы для ресторанов и кафе в ОАЭ будут начинаться от 1500 дирхамов для ресторанов и кафе и от 1700 дирхамов для магазинов. ❗️Рестораны и кафе вместимостью до 50 мест будут платить 1500 дирхамов в год, при вместимости от 51 до 100 мест — 27…
👀12👎5🥱2❤1🔥1
С декабря все дубайские заведения, где играет музыка (да, включая знаменитую «дубайскую флэшку» с Хабиби) будут обязаны покупать на это лицензию. No money, no music)
😁19👀13❤6
Главная постановка этого сезона в Зальцбурге - Кармен. Дирижер - наше все Курентзис. Главная партия - Асмик Григорян. Которая сопрано, но тут вышла петь меццо. Режиссер - Габриэла Кариссо, которая вообще-то хореограф, поэтому тут не только поют, но ещё и танцуют. Это делает труппа Peeping Tom, старательно изображающая персонажей под воздействием одного вещества, которое мы тут по цензурным соображениям упоминать н…
❤60👍10😁5🤡4
По вашим многочисленным просьбам, Спецкор готов поделиться своими впечатлениями от Зальцбургского фестиваля. А потом вернемся к нашей дубайской тематике. Кто оперу не любит, потерпите) Итак. В этот раз удалось послушать четыре оперы. 1. Путешествие в Реймс Россини. Абсолютно звездный состав. Чечилия Бартоли, Дмитрий Корчак, Ильдебрандо Д’Арканжело, Мелисса Пети и новые для меня - тенор Эдгаро Роча и бас Петер Келл…
❤55🔥12👏8😴1
Спецкор со всем согласен, но хотелось бы добавить пару слов. Пункт 7. Не просто уважают, а очень любят русскую культуру. Большой театр, Эрмитаж и тд - это все известно и любимо. Никаких лиц на «из Москвы» никто делать не будет и никогда не делал. Даже в феврале 22 года (проверено на себе и неоднократно). Крайне доброжелательно австрийцы (не путать с немцами) настроены к россиянам и на то есть причины. Исторические…
👍53🤣17❤12🤡5
Консьерж отеля, в котором я всегда живу в Зальцбурге, работает в нем давно, поэтому мы хорошо знакомы и можем себе позволить общаться чуть более фамильярно, чем это обычно принято. Вы у нас в системе под несколькими разными адресами - со смехом сказал мне он. Вы любите переезжать? Действительно, я у них зарегистрирована как минимум под 5 разными дубайскими адресами и 2 московскими. Объяснила ему и его коллегам, чт…
😁126🤣39❤25👍4🥱2🗿1
«По следам обсуждения истории Jetour в Катаре: личный взгляд на китайский автопром и его успехи не только в России, но и по всему миру (за исключением США пока что). Первые китайские машины в российских салонах я увидел в 2008 году. Зрелище было душераздирающее: плохое качество материалов и сборки, дешевый пластик внутри, с резким химическим запахом, проблемы с запчастями и тд. Тогда брали только ценой - действител…
❤40👍9🔥4
Спецкор сейчас находится на оперном фестивале в Зальцбурге (я знаю, что опера никого не интересует, поэтому не пишу))). Но, поскольку вас очень заинтересовал вопрос китайского автопрома, то решил Спецкор допросить с пристрастием дружественного профессионала автобизнеса. Узнать, почему китайцы так хорошо продаются, даже в тех странах, граждане которых могут свободно покупать все, что угодно. Например, в ОАЭ. Следую…
❤27👍5✍1
Мы бы и разобрали, вещь действительно красивая и удобная, особенно у кого постоянный bad hair day (мой случай), но коллекцию выпустили специально для Малайзии и когда она будет в других странах (если будет) непонятно. В странах Залива Uniqlo вообще не представлен, ни онлайн, ни офлайн. Все ждём и ждём(
❤21🔥7
Ох. Только тачки обсудили, как выяснилось, что сегодня был взрыв в автосалоне на SZR. Пишут, что газовый балон. Один погибший, пятеро раненых…
😢26💔10😨7
Ну и вот вдогонку прекрасная история про приключения китайцев в Заливе. Это случилось примерно год назад в Катаре, хотел Спецкор вам тогда рассказать, но что то его отвлекло)) А она крайне поучительная. Одним из китайских бестселлеров в странах Залива является Jetour T2. Острословы не устают писать, что он очень уж напоминает уменьшенную копию Land Rover Defender и именно этим его успех объясняется. Но факт остает…
❤112👍57👏18🔥15😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @dubaispetskor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@dubaispetskor edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 63,932 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дубайский Спецкор” (@dubaispetskor), 9,590 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dubaispetskor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.