Channel
@ep_uc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21,212subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001555507916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ep_uc |
| Created | 20 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ep_uc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 21,212 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 21,207 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 21,209 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 21,210 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 21,216 | +14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 21,202 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 21,202 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (30 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 108,510 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 00:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ep_uc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjdrDJFD | 1 | 11 August 2026 | 11 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
❌Со вчерашнего дня недоступны CRL двух УЦ (по факту конечно это один УЦ для тахографов): 🔹Модум - https://e-trust.gosuslugi.ru/registry/accreditation/1177746857045 🔹Атлас Карт - https://e-trust.gosuslugi.ru/registry/accreditation/1037714042596 ✅Up. Доступны с 15.00, недоступность наблюдалась 28 часов.
Июнь 2013 - С 2015 года электронная карта заменит российский паспорт Декабрь 2021 - МВД планирует начать выдавать россиянам электронные паспорта в январе 2023 года Июнь 2022 - Минцифры заморозило проект выдачи цифровых паспортов на неопределенный срок Август 2026 - Депутаты предложили вернуться к идее введения пластиковых карт для удостоверения личности гражданина. ✍️"Об ЭП и УЦ"
Минцифры, вот это другой 210-ФЗ - он не про Госуслуги (там тоже 210-ФЗ, от 2010 года, вступил в силу пятнадцать лет назад), он про Антифрод 2.0. Названия законов можно было и прочитать. Хватит позорить нашу сферу.
13 августа в 11:00 приглашаем на вебинар компании ELMA «Управление перевозочной документацией в сквозном процессе закупок». Заказ поставщику находится в одной системе, перевозка — в другой, ЭПД — у оператора, а информация о фактической поставке собирается вручную. Чем больше поставщиков, объектов и перевозок, тем дороже становится такая «сшивка». На вебинаре покажем, как крупным компаниям связать закупки, логистик…
Неожиданное от адвокатов, отстав лет на 10 они всё-таки постигают самые основы нашей сферы и выясняют, что «открепленный файл электронной цифровой подписи ЕСИА» сам по себе не позволяет определить вид подписи: АПМО разъясняет, что в соответствии с ч. 1 ст. 6 Федерального закона «Об электронной подписи» (далее – Закон об электронной подписи) информация в электронной форме, подписанная действительной усиленной квалифиц…
✍️Первый проект НПА, связанный с Национальным УЦ Во исполнение пункта 9 плана-графика (есть всё-таки план-график!) подготовки нормативных правовых актов, необходимых для реализации норм Федерального закона от 26 июня 2026 г. № 210-ФЗ «О внесении изменений в Федеральный закон «О связи» и отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации», утвержденного Заместителем Председателя Правительства Российской Федерации - …
Противоречивое решение УФАС - на поставку СКЗИ лицензия не требуется По обращению одного участника закупки из документации на поставку ключевого носителя Рутокен ЭЦП 3.0 3220 (сертифицированного ФСБ) было исключено требование к участникам о наличии лицензии ФСБ России на распространение шифровальных (криптографических) средств. Вроде бы куда проще - передача (распространение) СКЗИ, 21 пункт перечня работ и услуг ли…
✍️Исторический пост - план подготовки правовых актов 2011 15 лет назад распоряжением Правительства 1214-р был утвержден План подготовки правовых актов в целях реализации федеральных законов «Об электронной подписи» и «О внесении изменений в отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации в связи с принятием Федерального закона «Об электронной подписи». Это был единственный случай, когда разработка подзаконных ак…
Отзыв квалифицированных сертификатов через Госуслуги за 7 месяцев 2026 года 57 % всех отзывов за 7 месяцев 2026 - квал. Госключа, для кого собственно сервис и делали. 2 АУЦ отзыв не осуществляли. Всего отозвано более 45 тыс. квалифицированных сертификатов. 🚀Об ЭП и УЦ
Как бесплатная цифра в ноль рублей оборачивается чеком на 50 миллионов Раздача отечественных TLS-сертификатов через Госуслуги ничего не стоит для компаний, однако переезд неожиданно обнажил скопившийся за годы техдолг. Пока обычные пользователи спокойно заходят через Яндекс Браузер, крупняк подсчитывает вынужденные расходы. Интеграция в инфраструктуру компании на пару десятков тысяч сотрудников встает в 10–50 миллио…
🏛 Судебная практика - суд признал кредитный договор незаключенным в связи с мошенническими действиями с использованием простой ЭП Решение Ростовского суда вступило в силу. Интересно, на что указал суд: электронная подпись, будучи техническим средством идентификации, не может подменять собой действительную волю лица на принятие кредитных обязательств, особенно в случаях, когда имеются объективные данные о возможных м…
Бухгалтеры и в 2026 году продолжают оставаться главной причиной компрометации ключей электронной подписи. Может им для удобства ещё по 7 ключей разных организаций на один токен записывать? Только такие жизненные кейсы с проблемами для бизнеса заставляют руководителей задуматься о последствиях, когда уже поздно.
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @ep_uc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 13,766 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Об ЭП и УЦ” (@ep_uc), 21,212 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ep_uc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.