Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TAdviser

Channel

TAdviser

@tadviser

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,465subscribers

+62 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001001793461
TypeChannel
Username@tadviser
DescriptionКанал портала TAdviser.ru e-mail [email protected] РКН https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6734832f8a5fe04efd3e5442&registryType=bloggers
Created30 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/tadviser

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,38613,47713,431.513,4655 August 202611 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 98 days, net +62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,372–13,491 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 20:3913,465-5
10 Nov 2026, 01:0513,470-6
8 Nov 2026, 18:0113,476+4
7 Nov 2026, 11:4913,472-5
5 Nov 2026, 14:2913,477+4
4 Nov 2026, 15:2613,473+4
3 Nov 2026, 13:0413,469-1
2 Nov 2026, 13:0513,470+5
1 Nov 2026, 14:0413,465-3
31 Oct 2026, 12:0413,468+3
30 Oct 2026, 15:0513,465-2
29 Oct 2026, 15:5013,467+3
27 Oct 2026, 19:4113,464+6
26 Oct 2026, 17:3913,458-4
25 Oct 2026, 16:3413,462+2
23 Oct 2026, 18:5513,460+6
22 Oct 2026, 19:1913,454+7
21 Oct 2026, 18:0713,447+8
20 Oct 2026, 16:4913,439+8
19 Oct 2026, 18:0013,431first reading

Engagement

160 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.2%
avg views ÷ 13,465 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,180
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.268%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 160 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held160 (30 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total106,581
Reactions total248
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 08:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,260
Videos
≈45
Links
≈5,730

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

830 reactions across 114 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤17120.6%
👍16620.0%
🔥14717.7%
😁14016.9%
🤣384.58%
🤯263.13%
🕊131.57%
🤡131.57%
👏111.33%
✍91.08%
🥴91.08%
🍌70.843%
🙈70.843%
🤔70.843%
👌60.723%
💯60.723%
😱60.723%
⚡50.602%
❤‍🔥50.602%
👀50.602%
17 further kinds333.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 137 of the 160 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 915 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 160 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
8 of 160 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
8
posts carrying an erid · 8 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,970
over 8 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,510
over 149 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFG9Grq7124 August 202624 August 2026
2W5zFGheTy314 August 20264 August 2026
2W5zFGm5Eic15 August 20265 August 2026
2W5zFHgbGhP117 August 202617 August 2026
2W5zFHnQkt219 November 20269 November 2026
2W5zFHzNnbb117 August 202617 August 2026
2W5zFJ34zHf12 September 20262 September 2026
2W5zFK1Ait915 August 20265 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 160 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 49 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 05:36 UTC981 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Счетная палата и Минцифры выявили недочеты при эксплуатации «ГосОблака». «Ростелекому» выставлены неустойки на 1,3 млрд рублей https://www.tadviser.ru/a/253979 —————————— TAdviser в MAX и ВК

🤯5❤3

11 Nov 2026, 14:06 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

В России создано ПО для управления ИИ-серверами на замену NVIDIA AI Enterprise https://www.tadviser.ru/a/978394 —————————— TAdviser в MAX и ВК

11 Nov 2026, 06:35 UTC≈1,810 views13 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Marketing_PR_ITPhoto

Positive Technologies разморозил расходы на продвижение и маркетинг – они выросли на 53% В 3 квартале 2026 года расходы Positive Technologies на продвижение и маркетинг достигли 246,2 млн рублей, увеличившись по сравнению с аналогичным кварталом 2025 года на 53%. Тогда этот показатель составлял 160,8 млн рублей. Эти суммы включают в себя в т.ч. зарплаты сотрудников, занимающихся продвижением. В 3 квартале 2026 года…

❤6🤣4👍2🍌1

10 Nov 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,810 views18 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Не ради денег: «Базис» осваивает зарубежные рынки, чтобы научиться конкурировать с VMWare и Citrix https://www.tadviser.ru/a/549023 —————————— TAdviser в MAX и ВК

🤣9👍5😁4

10 Nov 2026, 15:28 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Игроки рынка телеком-оборудования предложили новую схему включения в реестр, чтобы он не опустел с 2028 года https://www.tadviser.ru/a/455722 —————————— TAdviser в MAX и ВК

10 Nov 2026, 14:57 UTC≈1,780 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Освободить за 24 часа: Минцифры придумало механизм срочного выделения ресурсов в коммерческих ЦОД под ИТ-системы из «белого списка» https://www.tadviser.ru/a/53913 —————————— TAdviser в MAX и ВК

🙈5

10 Nov 2026, 14:27 UTC≈1,760 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Состояние и развитие ИТ-ландшафта в мнениях заказчиков из крупных российских компаний. Исследование TAdviser В период с ноября 2025 года по май 2026 года аналитический центр TAdviser провел ряд исследовательских проектов, посвященных анализу текущего состояния и перспектив развития ИТ-ландшафтов крупных российских компаний из различных отраслей экономики. Проекты были связаны с различными аспектами управления ИТ, и…

🔥2

10 Nov 2026, 12:40 UTC≈1,760 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

«Подрыв авторитета госорганов»: экс-замглавы Казначейства отказали в пересмотре уголовного дела о контракте с «Техносервъ А/С» https://www.tadviser.ru/a/120049 —————————— TAdviser в MAX и ВК

👍4

10 Nov 2026, 11:55 UTC≈2,190 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

От данных к агентам: куда движется корпоративный ИИ Внедрение ИИ в разных компаниях чаще всего идет по схожей логике: сначала нужно навести порядок в данных, затем создать ИИ-агентов, автоматизировать работу в конкретных бизнес-функциях, а дальше — сформировать единую среду, где люди смогут управлять системой агентов и масштабировать успешные ИИ-сценарии на уровне всей компании. Эта логика повторяется в разных отрас…

👌2👍2

10 Nov 2026, 09:29 UTC≈1,920 views3 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Газпромбанк решил отказаться от межсетевых экранов Check Point https://www.tadviser.ru/a/977873 —————————— TAdviser в MAX и ВК

❤2👍1

10 Nov 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,960 views10 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Норвик Банк рассказал об управлении секретами с помощью StarVault Норвик Банк — один из ведущих игроков на российском рынке залогового кредитования — внедрил систему управления секретами StarVault от Orion soft. Решение позволило банку поддержать системный подход к управлению чувствительными инфраструктурными данными в соответствии с требованиями отраслевых регуляторов. Подробнее >>>

❤4👍4🔥2

9 Nov 2026, 09:55 UTC≈2,000 views0 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Холдинг «Экспанта» приобрел 15% в российской ИТ-компании «Ирактис», которая разработала платформу для управления проектами, знаниями и сервисными процессами. Согласно данным сервиса проверки контрагентов Rusprofile, ООО «Ирактис Трекер» было зарегистрировано в октябре прошлого года в Татарстане. Роману Третьякову принадлежит 42,5% компании. Стоимость компании оценивается в 100 млн рублей. 15% владеет ООО «Экспанта».…

Showing the 12 most recent of 160 posts we hold for @tadviser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@tadviser edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Нецифровая экономика
@antidigital · 24,479
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Минцифры России
@mintsifry · 232,323
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
Телекоммуналка
@telecommunal · 43,857
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
Все о блокчейн/мозге/space/WEB 3.0 в России и мире
@blockchainRF · 20,455
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 September 2026
Об ЭП и УЦ
@ep_uc · 21,396
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 September 2026
Про tech и этих
@protechietich · 20,851
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 September 2026
Yandex Cloud
@yandexcloudnews · 23,943
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 September 2026
Немкин
@ainemkin · 45,870
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 7 September 2026
УМНЫЙ ГОРОД
@russiasmartcity · 19,250
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 October 2026
Майский указ
@maydecree · 19,484
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 October 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TAdviser” (@tadviser), 13,465 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tadviser.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.