Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PRO Стоимость | Стройка

@pro_cost_building

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,051subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002825785585
TypeChannel
Username@pro_cost_building
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pro_cost_building

Growth

1,0501,0511,050.56 August 2026 — 1,050 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,050 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,051 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,050–1,051 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 03:511,051+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:511,050no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:381,050first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.4%
avg views ÷ 1,051 subscribers
Avg views / post
855
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.758%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (22 May 202630 July 2026)
Views total2,566
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4273.7%
💯1119.3%
🤔35.26%
👎11.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,900 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Новые типовые условия контрактов на проектирование: а давайте их примем как есть! Ознакомился с проектом постановления Правительства РФ, разработанным Минстроем, содержащим новые типовые условия контрактов на проектирование. Очень интересный проект. Очень. Лично мне сразу "режет глаз" ограничения на иностранное оборудование, поставляемое по параллельному импорту и на уникальные изделия, не имеющие аналоги (а это все

👍7💯6

25 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC344 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @developers_policyPhoto

Минстрой России о корректировке проектной и рабочей документации при замене материалов Письмо ведомства от 14.07.2026 № 42748-СЕ/09 В чем суть Замена материала или оборудования на аналог не всегда требует корректировки проектной документации. Если применяется материал, характеристики которого совпадают с характеристиками, указанными в проектной документации, то корректировка проектной и рабочей документации не тр

👍4

25 Jul 2026, 05:26 UTC322 viewsread 6 August 2026

Госдума приняла закон о руководящем характере разъяснений Пленума ВС https://pravo.ru/news/264921/ Документ закрепляет полномочия Пленума заслушивать доклады председателей судов по вопросам учета в практике его постановлений. Госдума одобрила во втором и третьем чтениях закон, который закрепляет руководящую роль разъяснений Пленума Верховного суда для нижестоящих судов. По действующим правилам ни закон о Верховном

9 Jul 2026, 20:27 UTC525 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Осталась как всегда самая малость - доказать невозможность исполнения именно из-за изменения ставки....

👍3

9 Jul 2026, 20:25 UTC407 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @smetyFile

ПП РФ № 864 от 09.07.2026 "Об изменении существенных условий контрактов на выполнение работ (оказание услуг) по ремонту и (или) содержанию автомобильных дорог общего пользования федерального значения в связи с увеличением с 1 января 2026 г. в соотв. с законодательством РФ налоговой ставки по НДС" НАИК и Минтранс сказали — и сделали.

30 Jun 2026, 12:23 UTC706 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

«Кто не работает тот ест! Учись, студент!» (х/ф «Операция „Ы“ и другие приключения Шурика» ) Стоило мне вернуться из отпуска, как пришло решение суда первой инстанции по одному судебному делу, в котором я принимал участие в качестве специалиста-эксперта. Кратко изложу суть: генеральный подрядчик, выполнявший работы по госконтракту, нанял для выполнения части работ субподрядчика, четко прописав что его работы в целях

👍6🤔3

10 Jun 2026, 09:53 UTC690 viewsread 6 August 2026

ГК Адепт: "Опечатки в нормативах затрат НЗ: как ошибки в справочниках искажают стоимость проектных работ." Коллеги из ГК "Адепт" (разработчики программных комплексов Адепт:Проект, Адепт:Смета, Адепт:BIM и экосистемы Адепт) сегодня на своем сайте разместили отличный обзор опечаток в нормативах затрат, которые используются при определении сметной стоимости проектных работ. Данный обзор можно свободно скачать (после пр

9 Jun 2026, 14:15 UTC530 viewsread 6 August 2026

Вышеприведенный пост могу прокомментировать просто: это тот самый случай, когда строителю надо срочно делать нотариальную строительно-техническую экспертизу. Если в моем канале есть те, кто столкнулся с подобной ситуацией - обращайтесь в личные сообщения. Обсудим и возможно даже найдем общие точки соприкосновения....

9 Jun 2026, 14:13 UTC478 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @umnaya_stroyka

Не знаю, случайно так получилось или нет, но у нас уже третью неделю пачками идут запросы на помощь в связи с односторонними отказами заказчиков от исполнения договора подряда. Но это ладно, время такое. Удивило другое. К моменту получения отказа, как правило, ни у одного подрядчика нет четкого представления о том, какой объем фактически выполнен на момент досрочного прекращения отношений с заказчиком. Речь не о то

5 Jun 2026, 20:04 UTC556 viewsread 6 August 2026

Хорошая новость пришла с ПМЭФ. Порог в 20 млн., установленный для перехода на уплату НДС, будет заморожен на несколько лет. Поэтому движение к уплате НДС вместо встречного становится односторонним и теперь направляется по полосе инфляции и, соответственно, повышения цен. Встречаем конец пятницы на позитиве!

5 Jun 2026, 16:57 UTC543 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Готовимся... С 1 сентября 2026 г. Вступает в силу перечень должностей в области строительства, требования к которым устанавливаются правилами саморегулирования в области инженерных изысканий, архитектурно-строительного проектирования, строительства, реконструкции, капитального ремонта, сноса объектов капитального строительства, утверждённый приказом Минстроя России от от 15 апреля 2026 года №238/пр (зарегитрирован Ми

👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pro_cost_building. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 260,923 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRO Стоимость | Стройка” (@pro_cost_building), 1,051 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_cost_building.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.