Channel
@IsacaRuSec
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,266subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001221874949 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IsacaRuSec |
| Created | 22 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IsacaRuSec |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 2,266 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:40 | 2,264 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 2,264 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
10 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 18 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Найти преподавателя для подготовке к сдаче экзаменов для сертификации в РФ возможно с помощью этого ресурса Увы, пока коллеги не готовят к экзаменам сертификации ИИ и пока нет без возможности сдачи экзаменов в центре сертификации в РФ.
👍4
До 30 июня ISACA пообещала 50% скидки на материалы для подготовки к 4 своим ИИ сертификациям. "From 18 May to 30 June, ISACA will be offering members an exclusive 50% discount on the non-member price of online AI training and all digital AI certifications exam preparation—nearly 30 products in total, covering fundamental AI education as well as AAIA, AAISM, and AAIR! No discount code needed! Discounts apply automati…
👍4
Сертификация ISACA Advanced in AI Risk (AAIR) выходит из беты в широкий доступ 15 апреля. https://www.isaca.org/credentialing/aair
👍1
С 1 января 2027 года ISACA планирует изменить подход по поддержке сертификатов. Планируется, что минимум 90 из требуемых 120 часов CPE по сертификату должны совпадать с темой сертификации/экзамена. Остальные 30 часов могут планироваться как и ранее. https://engage.isaca.org/connect/announcements?AnnouncementKey=7f7d1fda-aa44-4172-bfd1-019ce6f07cb7
👍1
ISACARuSec pinned «Всем привет! Актуальные посты теперь размещаются только в новом канале https://t.me/VPCBrief . В настоящий канал репостов больше не будет. В том случае, если в будущем обстановка позволит - настоящий канал будет посвящен активностям чаптера. Буду рад…»
Всем привет! Актуальные посты теперь размещаются только в новом канале https://t.me/VPCBrief . В настоящий канал репостов больше не будет. В том случае, если в будущем обстановка позволит - настоящий канал будет посвящен активностям чаптера. Буду рад вас видеть на новом канале.
2 апреля будет проходить одно из наиболее интересных для мероприятий по ИБ - Форум Территория Безопасности. Организаторы форума это бывшая команда другого мероприятия с историей CISO Forum (легко гуглится). В составе форума 4 крупных трека, которые организаторы называют полноценными конференциями, выставочная часть. Одна из стратегией которой я пользуюсь при выборе мероприятия и доклада для посещения это знание мн…
Интересная статистика по использованию агентов от Анторопика. У кибербезопасности процент недотягивает до академических исследований, но выше чем у обслуживания клиентов.
Неделю как вирусится график Антропика, где ИИ агенты используются. В нем разработка софта занимает половину всех кейсов. Многие делают из этого графика неверный вывод, что лидерство кодинга результат открытости разработчиков к новым технологиям. На самом деле программирование доминирует благодаря идеальной структуре для автоматизации с языковыми моделями: 1/ Сгенерированный результат легко проверяется тестами. 2/…
Ещё раз про базовые настройки безопасности для 1С от Лаборатории Касперского на основе реальных инцидентов. Приводятся вспомогательные правила для Kaspesky EDR Expert. https://securelist.ru/how-1c-compromise-could-have-been-avoided/114764/
Chain-of-Thought Мониторинг как дополнительный слой AI Safety 19-20 февраля в Белграде прошла конференция OpenTalks.AI, где одним из докладов был рассказ Сергея Николенко (наверняка, многим известный) на тему AI Safety в 2026 году. Пока смотрела запись, накидала себе много полезных вещей и об одной из них хочу рассказать вам (а потом, может, и до других доберусь). Обычно наблюдаю, что внутри подходов для мониторинг…
Рекомендую ознакомиться с докладом Минцифры по анализу действующей нормативки по ИИ в мире. Остальные доклады скорее как кейсы с которыми к вам могут прийти для защиты решения.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @IsacaRuSec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,145,048 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ISACARuSec” (@IsacaRuSec), 2,266 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IsacaRuSec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.