Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мутасов Студио

@mutasovstudio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,452subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002054235902
TypeChannel
Username@mutasovstudio
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mutasovstudio

Growth

1,4451,4521,448.57 August 2026 — 1,445 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,445 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,452 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,444–1,453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:411,452+7
7 Aug 2026, 22:021,445no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:291,445first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.0%
avg views ÷ 1,452 subscribers
Avg views / post
857
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held11 (14 May 202619 July 2026)
Views total4,286
Reactions total167
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

307 reactions across 11 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11738.1%
🔥9230.0%
👍4013.0%
❤‍🔥185.86%
🙏72.28%
😁61.95%
🦄51.63%
🌭41.30%
👏41.30%
🙈41.30%
🥰30.977%
🌚20.651%
💯20.651%
🥱20.651%
🗿10.326%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 11 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mutasovstudio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC831 views30 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
File

Нашел в сети текст книги, надеюсь не нарушил ничьих авторских прав, впрочем, думаю сам Энди одобрил бы.

17🙏6❤‍🔥4👍2😁1

19 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC831 views32 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

25👍3🌚2🦄2

17 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC989 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Заканчивают это эссе Шесть правил Оруэлла (как писать ясно и честно): 1. Никогда не используйте метафору, сравнение или другую фигуру речи, которые вы привыкли видеть в печати (избегайте штампов). 2. Никогда не употребляйте длинное слово там, где можно обойтись коротким (например, «помогать» вместо «оказывать содействие»). 3. Если можно вырезать слово, всегда вырезайте его (краткость — сестра таланта). 4. Если мо

🔥3715👍15🥰3

17 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC774 views11 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Сегодня мы с Ксюшей Дукалис почти синхронно вспоминаем Джорджа Оруэлла. В этом эссе Оруэлл доказывает, что плохой язык ведёт к плохой политике. Когда политики используют казённые, расплывчатые и пассивные обороты, они скрывают правду и притупляют критическое мышление. Человек, который говорит штампами, не может ясно мыслить, а значит, им легче манипулировать. Он утверждает, что упадок языка можно обратить вспять соз

🔥11

17 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC861 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dukalitiFile

Оруэлл, которого вы не читали Джордж Оруэлл в 20-х годах 21 века переживает пик популярности сравниться с которым могут лишь Франкл и Фуко. Но помимо художественных произведений, которые у всех на слуху, у него еще есть статьи. Одна из них — «Politics and the English Language» — мне очень нравится, потому что я вижу грустную иронию в ее актуальности спустя 80 лет с момента выпуска. Это 14 страниц, на которых автор д

🔥17👍43

25 Jun 2026, 13:31 UTC946 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

IKEA не купила права на ЧМ. У них был лишь каталог товаров. И этого оказалось достаточно. Креаторы из IKEA взяли обычные предметы из магазина — ковры, лампы, мягкие игрушки, складные столы — и собрали из них флаги 18 стран-участниц ЧМ-2026. Флаг Канады: полотенце VÅGSJÖN сложено в кленовый лист. Флаг Бразилии: зелёный ворсистый ковёр, жёлтый складной стол, синий диск из мелких аксессуаров. Флаг Японии: абажур намек

16🔥15❤‍🔥14👍10🗿1

11 Jun 2026, 06:05 UTC759 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Смешной и одновременно пугающий эксперимент: инженер из говна и палок собрал робота, дал ему пистолет, написал ему простенький промпт с дурным характером и по очереди подключал его к основным нейросетям (Claude, Chat GPT, Grok и Gemini), — и вуаля! — несмотря на все базовые ограничения безопасности, робот сначала расправился с домашним пылесосом, а после и вовсе расстрелял своего создателя! О, дивный новый мир! htt

6🙈4🦄3🌭2

23 May 2026, 08:51 UTC943 views24 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
File

В эпоху, когда ИИ активно теснит лишенные творческой основы профессии, особенно важны люди, которые помогают развивать свою собственную креативность и интуицию. Мой давний друг, психолог Максим Алябьев создал аудио-технику, которая помогает настроиться на создание новых идей, войти в потоковое состояние перед собеседованиями или публичными выступлениями. Забирайте аудиофайл и попробуйте настроиться с ним перед важн

14🔥7💯2🙏1

19 May 2026, 08:38 UTC679 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Потрясающая продуктивность и одержимость своим делом — 2 бренда в управлении (Dior и собственный J.W.Andrson), 10+ коллекций за год, спецпроекты и реклама, которые он курирует лично, а теперь еще и 3 фильма! А ты пост для соцсетей не можешь закончить уже неделю!

😁54🥱2🌭1👍1

19 May 2026, 08:38 UTC907 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @theblueprintnewsPhoto

Джонатан Андерсон сообщил, что планирует выступить художником по костюмам как минимум в трех фильмах в ближайшие 12 месяцев. Среди них будет новая работа Луки Гуаданьино, с которым Андерсон уже сотрудничал. Дизайнер рассказал об этом в интервью итальянскому изданию Milano Finanza после показа своей первой круизной коллекции для Dior в Лос-Анджелесе. Как оказалось, выбор локации был отсылкой не только к прошлой связи

5👍5

14 May 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,030 views22 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

ИИ не убивает профессии. Он убивает бездарность. Я часто слышу жаркие споры: одни профессии ИИ заменит полностью, другие — никогда. Дескать, есть «творческие» профессии, где ИИ бесполезен, а есть «функциональные», где он всё сделает сам. Я вижу иначе. ИИ заменяет не профессии. Он заменяет подход внутри профессий. Никакой ИИ не заменит классного юриста или бухгалтера. Того, кто творчески подходит к своей работе, п

12🔥5👏4🌭1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mutasovstudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мутасов Студио” (@mutasovstudio), 1,452 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mutasovstudio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.