12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,129–11,172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 10:55
11,137
+3
15 Aug 2026, 17:58
11,134
-5
14 Aug 2026, 08:47
11,139
-1
13 Aug 2026, 03:57
11,140
-7
12 Aug 2026, 07:31
11,147
+1
11 Aug 2026, 10:28
11,146
-5
10 Aug 2026, 07:03
11,151
-2
9 Aug 2026, 09:52
11,153
-6
8 Aug 2026, 09:00
11,159
-6
7 Aug 2026, 10:41
11,165
-2
6 Aug 2026, 15:15
11,167
no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:08
11,167
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.4%
avg views ÷ 11,137 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,500
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
25 (27 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
35,939
Reactions total
1,877
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,710
Videos
≈74
Links
≈1,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 39s
Average length
1m 39s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,877 reactions across 24 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
387
20.6%
💔
386
20.6%
😢
268
14.3%
🔥
266
14.2%
😁
191
10.2%
🤡
99
5.27%
💯
69
3.68%
🤯
64
3.41%
❤🔥
38
2.02%
👍
31
1.65%
👀
23
1.23%
🤔
17
0.906%
👎
9
0.479%
😐
8
0.426%
😨
7
0.373%
🤨
6
0.32%
🎉
4
0.213%
👻
3
0.16%
🌚
1
0.053%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,877reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пять лет после захвата власти талибами: UN, UNESCO и UNFPA фиксируют «полное стирание» афганских женщин из общественной жизни
12 августа агентства ООН опубликовали совместный отчёт по итогам пяти лет режима талибов в Афганистане: издано более 100 указов, ограничивающих права женщин; 2,4 млн девочек лишены среднего образования; зафиксирован кризис психического здоровья среди женщин. UNESCO призвала к полному восстано…
Каждая третья женщина не знает, что перименопауза может влиять на психическое здоровье
К такому выводу пришли авторы опроса LifeStance Health среди 1 000 женщин, проходящих через перименопаузу или менопаузу. 33% участниц не знали, что гормональные изменения могут сопровождаться симптомами со стороны психического здоровья.
При этом многие месяцами не связывали своё состояние с перименопаузой:
— 74% испытывали симпто…
В российских вузах может появиться «Университет родительства»
Минобрнауки РФ планирует запустить просветительский проект, который будет готовить студентов к семейной жизни и воспитанию детей. В рамках инициативы хотят проводить добровольные встречи студентов и сотрудников вузов с многодетными родителями, специалистами по семейным отношениям и экспертами в области психологии и коммуникации.
Рабочие названия инициати…
Желаем вам также радоваться своим результатам после долгой работы ради них:)
Это Алина Гайфутдинова установила новый рекорд России на чемпионате Европы по водным видам спорта в Париже.
Forbes представил ежегодный рейтинг 50 женщин старше 50 лет, трансформирующих бизнес и технологии.
В список 2026 года вошли основательницы, CEO и учёные в сферах биотеха, ИИ, климата и финансов, что подкрепляет тезис о позднем предпринимательском пике женской карьеры.
Изучить можно тут.
Miranna теперь на Бусти 🎉
Актуальные знания о женском здоровье, физиологии и велнесе должны быть доступны всем. Но большинство современных книг не переведены на русский, да и подкасты с экспертами — ну кроме того, что длятся по 3 часа — тоже почти все на английском.
Поэтому мы собираем актуальную базу — о здоровье, теле, родительстве и карьере — и переводим на русский. Все саммари книг и подкастов из приложения Mir…
Обзор в Australian Journal of General Practice: терапия менопаузальной гормональной поддержки снижает смертность на 30% при старте в течение 10 лет после менопаузы
В августовском номере Australian Journal of General Practice опубликован клинический обзор, обобщающий данные из Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study, ELITE, KEEPS и Cochrane-обзора 2015 года: начало пероральной менопаузальной гормональной терапии в течен…
MyFitnessPal и другие AI-трекеры занижают калории на треть — исследование NIH
Если вы считаете калории через фото в приложении — вы, скорее всего, считаете меньше, чем едите на самом деле.
Исследователи из NIH протестировали четыре популярных AI-трекера: MyFitnessPal, LoseIt!, CalAI и Appediet. Они сфотографировали 102 блюда, приготовленных в лабораторной кухне — каждый ингредиент взвешен с точностью до 0.1 грамма.…
Для женщин удалёнка важнее зарплаты. Для мужчин — наоборот
FlexJobs обнаружил гендерный разрыв в карьерных приоритетах.
Что важно при выборе работы:
— удалёнка — главный приоритет для 37% женщин против 30% мужчин;
— зарплата — главный приоритет для 31% мужчин против 24% женщин;
— гибкий график учитывают 64% женщин против 49% мужчин;
— work-life balance — 55% женщин против 48% мужчин;
— 78% женщин говорят, что налич…
🩳 В Токио мужчинам разрешили шорты на работе. Женщины назвали это «харассментом волосатых ног»
В апреле губернатор Токио запустила «Tokyo Cool Biz» — кампанию, призывающую офисных работников сменить костюмы и галстуки на футболки и шорты. Причина — рекордная жара: в июле метеорологи ввели термин «kokusho-bi» («жестоко жаркий день») для температур выше 40°C.
Формально кампания распространяется на оба пола — но женщи…
Норвежские учёные проанализировали данные более 27 тысяч женщин и обнаружили связь между неблагоприятным опытом в детстве и рядом репродуктивных исходов во взрослом возрасте
Женщины, которые сообщали о сложном детстве, разводе или потере родителей, неблагополучной семейной обстановке или тяжёлых детских воспоминаниях, чаще сталкивались с бесплодием. Кроме того, у них был выше риск преждевременных родов и рождения де…
🤯53💔21❤15💯5
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @femalefounder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 140,445 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Стадика — стажировки, стипендии, обучение @studyqa · 156,968 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Female Founder” (@femalefounder), 11,137 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/femalefounder.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.