💰 Payward инвестирует миллиарды в преобразование в единую финансовую инфраструктуру Компания Payward анонсировала масштабные инвестиции, направленные на трансформацию в финансового инфраструктурного гиганта. Это изменение может существенно повлиять на рыночную динамику, однако перед компанией стоят серьезные регуляторные и интеграционные вызовы. @PROBTRADING 🌐 Наши ссылки | Торгуем на Bybit | Торгуем на FOMO | Тор…

Channel
PRO CRYPTO TRADING
@PROBTRADING
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
47,706subscribers
-1,911 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001201452227 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PROBTRADING |
| Description | ✅Реклама / Advertising: 1️⃣Manager: https://t.me/problockchain_sales 2️⃣AI Agent : https://t.me/PBM_Agent_bot 3️⃣Mail: [email protected] 4️⃣Mail: [email protected] |
| Created | 18 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PROBTRADING |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 47,706 | -288 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 47,994 | -76 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 48,070 | -34 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 48,104 | -86 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 48,190 | -74 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 48,264 | -138 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 48,402 | -83 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 48,485 | -69 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:33 | 48,554 | -51 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:43 | 48,605 | -50 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 48,655 | -39 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 48,694 | -35 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 48,729 | -52 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 48,781 | -70 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 48,851 | -20 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 48,871 | -44 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 48,915 | -49 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 48,964 | -57 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 49,021 | -57 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 49,078 | first reading |
Engagement
408 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.43%
- avg views ÷ 47,706 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 205
- 233 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.515%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 233
- of 408 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 233 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 408 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 47,759 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 22:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,500
- Videos
- ≈166
- Links
- ≈10,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
64 reactions across 55 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 39.1% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 23.4% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 18.8% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 408 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 408 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔗 PeerDAS успешно работает на Ethereum почти год! Проект улучшает масштабируемость и децентрализацию сети, снижая затраты на транзакции и позволяя более широкому кругу участников участвовать без необходимости в обновлении оборудования. @PROBTRADING 🌐 Наши ссылки | Торгуем на Bybit | Торгуем на FOMO | Торгуем на Polymarket
❤1
💰 Bitget объявил о запуске программы вознаграждения в 5% за замораживание средств, украденных в результате атаки на сумму $351,6 млн. Генеральный директор Bitget, Грейси Чен, сделала заявление на X, призывая другие биржи присоединиться к усилиям по восстановлению украденных активов. @PROBTRADING 🌐 Наши ссылки | Торгуем на Bybit | Торгуем на FOMO | Торгуем на Polymarket
⚖️ Kalshi потерпела неудачу в очередном апелляционном деле. Шестой окружной суд отклонил апелляцию компании в Огайо и Теннесси всего через месяц после того, как другой апелляционный суд поддержал решение в пользу Невады. Нью-Джерси по-прежнему имеет противоречащее решение. Теперь вопрос о регулировании предсказательных рынков как азартных игр становится не только юридическим, но и практическим. @PROBTRADING 🌐 Наши…
🚀 Продажи NFT увеличились на 57.17%, достигнув $55.5 млн за неделю, завершившуюся 26 сентября! По данным CryptoSlam, Ethereum продолжает лидировать в продажах на блокчейне, а коллекция CryptoPunks занимает первое место среди всех коллекций. @PROBTRADING 🌐 Наши ссылки | Торгуем на Bybit | Торгуем на FOMO | Торгуем на Polymarket
🏦 Федеральная резервная система США предпринимает шаги к ужесточению правил для стейблкоинов с двумя новыми предложениями в рамках акта GENIUS. 📝 Публичные комментарии по этим предложениям будут открыты в течение 60 дней после публикации в Федеральном реестре. @PROBTRADING 🌐 Наши ссылки | Торгуем на Bybit | Торгуем на FOMO | Торгуем на Polymarket
Доброе утро! 🌐 Cитуация на рынке: #Капитализация рынка: $2.89 трлн #Капитализация сектора #DeFi: $87.38 млрд Курсы: #Bitcoin ~ $83 940.85 #Ethereum ~ $2 689.21 #ZEC ~ $1537.57 Bitcoin доминация: %58.27 #Лидеры роста за сутки: #AERO 27.0% #ENA 25.7% #SENA 23.2% #Лидеры падения за сутки: #RAIN -5.7% #FF -3.9% #MORPHO -3.1% #price Наши партнёры — https://web3mb.pro-blockchain.com/
🇮🇷 Иранский политик Пезешкиан отказался от встречи с Трампом, подчеркивая продолжающееся напряжение между США и Ираном. Этот шаг может дестабилизировать администрацию Трампа и повлиять на дипломатические усилия в регионе. @PROBTRADING 🌐 Наши ссылки | Торгуем на Bybit | Торгуем на FOMO | Торгуем на Polymarket
👍1
🚀 Polygon тестирует новую систему агентских платежей, которая обработала более 11 миллионов подтвержденных платежных обновлений в секунду на 25 узлах, при этом финальная расчетная операция остается привязанной к сети Polygon. Это достижение подчеркивает эффективность и скорость обработки транзакций на платформе, что может привлечь больше пользователей к экосистеме Polygon. @PROBTRADING 🌐 Наши ссылки | Торгуем на B…
🇰🇿 Казахстан разрешил криптошахтерам использовать избыточный газ с нефтяных месторождений для генерации электроэнергии. Эта политика может изменить глобальный рынок крипто-майнинга, снизив выбросы и энерготраты, а также потенциально revitalizируя местный майнинг-сектор. @PROBTRADING 🌐 Наши ссылки | Торгуем на Bybit | Торгуем на FOMO | Торгуем на Polymarket
🏦 Федеральная резервная система США представила два предложения, касающихся правил для стейблкоинов. Одно из предложений устанавливает условия, при которых застрахованные государственные банки могут запрашивать одобрение на создание дочерних компаний для выпуска стейблкоинов. Второе предложение описывает требования к эмитентам таких токенов. @PROBTRADING 🌐 Наши ссылки | Торгуем на Bybit | Торгуем на FOMO | Торгуем …
📈 Эфириум торгуется около $2667 на фоне притока капитала в ETFs в размере $66 млн за последние 5 дней. Уровень поддержки на отметке $2540, позитивные данные по BBP и риски по заемным средствам формируют следующие шаги к достижению отметки $3000. @PROBTRADING 🌐 Наши ссылки | Торгуем на Bybit | Торгуем на FOMO | Торгуем на Polymarket
Showing the 12 most recent of 408 posts we hold for @PROBTRADING. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Pro_Blockchain · 160,910#1
@PROBLOCKCHAINSQUAD · 279,174#2
@pronfti · 19,795#3
@insightsblockchain · 4,599#4
@ArmaCrypto · 891#5
@armen_invest · 2,416#6
@cryptopulsenow · 3,496#7
@CryptoTech_Pro · 3,710#8
@to_the_makemoney · 61,345#9
@AlexRich2018 · 43,724#10
@PROAltcoins · 4,069#11
@prominingbtc · 3,563#12
@notatraderrr · 138,917#13
@DeCenter · 1,823,722#14
@okx_ru · 3,751,329#15
@crypto_hd · 132,236#16
@polunintrade7 · 519,867#17
@cryptorun · 128,702#18
@slezisatoshi · 123,780#19
@Anton_cryptoo · 143,782#20
@CRYPTORELAKS · 26,502#21
@markettwits · 336,911#22
@toncoin_rus · 524,626#23
@Kripto_Azbuk · 293,747#24
@TonNewbie · 206,254#25
@daouptown · 155,239#26
@cryptodaily · 85,339#27
@crypto_vestnic · 208,013#28
@fil100 · 100,944#29
@stukach_trading · 309,957#30
@cryptus_academy · 56,854#31
@crypto_stukach · 563,644#32
@cryptorunio · 57,760#33
@toncryptans · 230,125#34
@coinside_public · 27,293#35
@notcoin · 8,552,225#36
@pro_ai_official · 41,359#37
@airdrop_hunter_public · 347,298#38
@Blockchain_insights_Global · 4,909#39
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,128,418#40
@invest_zonaa · 909,960#41
@pro_vse_official · 13,179#42
@zicelaqo · 165,921#43
@new_ton_news · 191,409#44
@catizenann · 3,550,802#45
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,507,910#46
@CryptoPulse_Global · 3,862#47
@PROmining_Global · 3,935#48
@Coin_Post · 291,333#49
@gram · 6,641,039#50
@semenchuk · 1,242,429#51
@eeusd · 1,133,430#52
@boomloudcoin · 1,653,140#53
@investkingyru · 1,708,904#54
@catapult_extreme · 8,398,685#55
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,171,582#56
@ToNmetasilense · 2,730,678#57
@hayzonn · 2,830,164#58
@newcoinopss · 129,623#59
@proenergymedia · 7,607#60
@pigscrew · 2,142,006#61
@vestirussia · 975,954#62
@clear_feed_media · 502,175#63
@finansist_busines · 620,476#64
@pocketfi · 1,799,855#65
@playweb4 · 143,104#66
@crypto_gst · 567,948#67
@crypto_jeman · 659,337#68
@hexnio · 1,998,607#69
@tons_base · 481,242#70
@belevskmove · 1,068,885#71
@eduardinvest · 1,354,680#72
@catgoldminerann · 895,679#73
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,182,616#74
@cryptopbm · 197,498#75
@dogs · 7,065,215#76
@blumcrypto · 14,188,780#77
@hotonnear · 4,631,154#78
@cultofnot · 1,020,011#79
@trendingapps · 3,784,156#80
@nasduck_official · 226,357#81
@builders · 3,409,127#82
@AmioCommunity · 1,747,054#83
@nomis_protocol · 1,536,662#84
@tonstationgames · 3,193,102#85
@lostdogscoru · 215,203#86
@iamalexfalcon · 3,054,448#87
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,234,054#88
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,213,111#89
@corn_battles · 1,045,929#90
@the_vertus · 2,149,775#91
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Pro_Blockchain · 160,910
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@pro_ai_official · 41,359
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
@PROBLOCKCHAINSQUAD · 279,174
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@coinside_public · 27,293
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
@LeelaPotok · 21,767
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
@cryptorunio · 57,760
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
@to_the_makemoney · 61,345
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
@new_ton_news · 191,409
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
@ULTRADE_Announcement · 30,266
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@myflem · 48,896
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
@cryptus_academy · 56,854
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
@AlexRich2018 · 43,724
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
@CryptopolitanOfficial · 25,000
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
@OrbsAnnouncements · 74,224
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
@dtiAlgo · 37,289
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRO CRYPTO TRADING” (@PROBTRADING), 47,706 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PROBTRADING.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.