daGama is a consumer app for Real World Locations (RWL) that leverages blockchain and AI technology to create a map with trusted recommendations.
🌐 https://dagama.world
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 50 days, net -2,236. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71,567–74,473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 14:57
71,902
-534
17 Sept 2026, 10:17
72,436
-76
15 Sept 2026, 07:57
72,512
-31
13 Sept 2026, 19:02
72,543
-111
12 Sept 2026, 00:37
72,654
-101
9 Sept 2026, 12:35
72,755
-201
6 Sept 2026, 01:39
72,956
-99
4 Sept 2026, 00:18
73,055
-59
2 Sept 2026, 13:43
73,114
-58
1 Sept 2026, 10:05
73,172
-27
31 Aug 2026, 08:38
73,199
-45
30 Aug 2026, 08:45
73,244
-34
29 Aug 2026, 05:51
73,278
-24
28 Aug 2026, 08:17
73,302
-36
27 Aug 2026, 06:35
73,338
-34
26 Aug 2026, 04:11
73,372
-29
25 Aug 2026, 02:36
73,401
-55
23 Aug 2026, 14:17
73,456
-71
21 Aug 2026, 22:29
73,527
-39
20 Aug 2026, 20:02
73,566
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.325%
avg views ÷ 71,902 subscribers
Avg views / post
233
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held
44 (15 July 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total
1,867
Reactions total
29
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Oct 2026, 14:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
419
Videos
21
Links
332
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 43s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
229 reactions across 42 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
89
38.9%
❤
83
36.2%
🔥
46
20.1%
😁
4
1.75%
🆒
2
0.873%
🙏
2
0.873%
👏
1
0.437%
💯
1
0.437%
🤔
1
0.437%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 229 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Not all staking periods pay the same 📊
Before you lock your $DGMA, it's worth comparing what each commitment period actually gets you — shorter periods for flexibility, longer ones for the highest yield.
Take two minutes, check the numbers, then decide what fits your strategy.
staking.astatech.io/dashboard
Stablecoins took a big step into everyday banking 🏦
Coinbase partnered with payments provider Moov to bring stablecoin acceptance, settlement, and instant funding to over 1,000 community banks and credit unions across the US.
This isn't a crypto-native app experimenting with stablecoins. It's mainstream financial infrastructure quietly adopting them as the rail underneath.
The more this becomes normal for everyday…
Thailand tightened its crypto Travel Rule 🇹🇭
The SEC now requires digital asset operators to collect information on all parties involved in crypto transfers, including transactions with custodial wallets. Rules take effect February 27, 2027, giving companies nearly six months to build the systems needed to transmit, receive, and monitor transaction data.
Per SEC Secretary-General Pornanong Budsaratragun, the move a…
Restake your $DGMA 🔄
Up to 25% APR available right now, one of the highest yields in the market. Lock in, compound your rewards, and stay positioned as the ecosystem grows.
staking.astatech.io/dashboard
Travel costs aren't cooling down this season 📈
Rising travel expenses have become a permanent phenomenon, and the trend is expected to continue into 2027.
Against that backdrop, more travelers — especially digital nomads and frequent flyers — are turning to crypto payments to dodge FX fees and card declines that make an already expensive trip cost even more.
Follow daGama to learn more about crypto travel tips 💡
Crypto-linked travel cards are quietly becoming mainstream infrastructure — not a niche perk 💳
Visa and Mastercard have both expanded partnerships with crypto card issuers this year, and regulatory clarity in the EU (MiCA) and UAE is making it easier for exchanges to issue cards that work like normal debit cards at any merchant, anywhere.
What this means for travelers:
▫️ No more converting crypto to cash before a…
565,657 $DGMA is currently staked 📊
That's real commitment, not idle supply sitting in wallets. Every token in there earns rewards and compounds as the ecosystem grows.
Haven't joined yet? Add yours and start earning.
staking.astatech.io
Spending crypto abroad shouldn't mean converting everything to cash first 💳
Here's how the top travel-friendly crypto cards stack up:
🥇 Coinbase Card
2% base cashback (up to 4%), 0% FX fee, savings APY up to 3.8%. Funded via crypto or bank transfer. Strong all-rounder for daily spending and travel.
🥇 KAST
1.5% base cashback (up to 3%), savings APY up to 5.5% — the highest yield on this list. Funding via crypto, SW…
Your staking period just ended. Don't let the momentum stop 🔄
Restaking sends your original stake plus everything you earned back into a new period — compounding instead of resetting to zero.
1️⃣ Go to the staking portal
2️⃣ Select Restake
3️⃣ Sign the transaction
Same commitment, bigger base, better return.
staking.astatech.io
Longer lock, bigger reward 📊
DGMA staking APR scales directly with your commitment period:
▫️ 16 weeks — 13.04% APR
▫️ 32 weeks — 17.04% APR
▫️ 52 weeks — 21.06% APR
▫️ 104 weeks — 25.07% APR
Same tokens, different timeline, very different outcome. The longest period gets you the highest yield in the market right now.
Pick your period and start earning: staking.astatech.io
Every PoP attestation starts as raw material, not truth 🧱
Each source generates a structured event containing:
▫️ Event type — visit / route / interaction / participation
▫️ Target zone or object identifier — not raw coordinates
▫️ A time window
▫️ A commit hash of the payload
▫️ Cryptographic authenticity markers, when supported
▫️ A pseudonymized participant identifier
▫️ Optional environmental signals, without e…
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @da_ga_ma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which DePIN category do you think has the most room to grow? 📡
Compute30%
Wireless15%
Location & mapping35%
Storage25%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Cybro Announcements @cybro_io · 27,444 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
Crypto Hunters | Announcements @cryptohunters_announcements · 70,926 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
OnlyFacts @only_facts_news · 19,388 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 October 2026
Galeon - Announcements 📣 @Galeon_ANN · 22,106 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 September 2026
Codyfight Announcements @codyfightnews · 48,659 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
$STYLE Official @styletoken · 46,652 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Zealy @Zealy_Announcement · 57,271 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“daGama” (@da_ga_ma), 71,902 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/da_ga_ma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.