Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 97 days, net +462. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,300–21,976 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 07:41
21,864
+3
9 Nov 2026, 16:36
21,861
+4
8 Nov 2026, 10:56
21,857
-9
7 Nov 2026, 07:27
21,866
-1
6 Nov 2026, 07:49
21,867
+1
5 Nov 2026, 08:36
21,866
-8
3 Nov 2026, 03:07
21,874
+3
2 Nov 2026, 00:35
21,871
-1
1 Nov 2026, 01:27
21,872
+2
31 Oct 2026, 02:38
21,870
-4
30 Oct 2026, 02:39
21,874
+4
29 Oct 2026, 04:28
21,870
+1
28 Oct 2026, 04:07
21,869
-7
27 Oct 2026, 06:11
21,876
-7
26 Oct 2026, 08:36
21,883
+1
25 Oct 2026, 08:58
21,882
-3
24 Oct 2026, 10:36
21,885
-3
23 Oct 2026, 12:20
21,888
+1
22 Oct 2026, 14:46
21,887
+2
21 Oct 2026, 06:21
21,885
first reading
Engagement
58 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 85 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.1%
avg views ÷ 21,864 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,190
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 58 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
58 (19 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
54,420
Reactions total
1,159
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 03:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
15m 30s
Average length
1m 33s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,572 reactions across 56 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,829
61.9%
🔥
405
8.86%
❤🔥
349
7.63%
🙏
330
7.22%
👏
236
5.16%
🥰
159
3.48%
👍
108
2.36%
💯
63
1.38%
🤗
41
0.897%
😍
24
0.525%
😢
12
0.262%
🤓
9
0.197%
😇
5
0.109%
🎉
2
0.044%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,633 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.72%
1 of 58 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,400
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,300
over 57 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjf44omu
1
22 August 2026
22 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
БЕРЕМЕННЫМ НЕЛЬЗЯ СПАТЬ НА СПИНЕ?
Доброе утро, дорогие подписчицы! ☀️
Сегодня поговорим о сне во время беременности.
Наверняка многие из Вас слышали, что беременным нельзя спать на спине, а лучше всего спать исключительно на левом боку.
Но действительно ли положение тела во время сна может влиять на течение беременности и состояние ребёнка?
В июле 2026 года в журнале Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada б…
И простят меня все пациентки с АФС, но вы не самые сложные, да всякое бывало и тромбозы на терапии я видела и нарушения кровотоков во время беременности, но везде можно было справиться, а вот с неясным и редким иммунным фактором сложнее.
Вы уходите, а я еще часа 2-3 сижу и думаю и потом всю беременность с Вами тоже в тревоге и переживаниях.
Чего ждать не знаешь, но пытаешься везде подстраховать.
Сложно, но я верю, ч…
Но Бим выгулян несколько раз, позанимались, поиграли, помылись.
Ответственность с собакеном уже другая, но справляемся.
Хотя одна нерешенная проблема есть, он не любит осень…теперь каждая прогулка это вот такое лицо 😁
Сегодня у меня должен был бы быть короткий рабочий день, но вместо того, чтобы завершить в 15:00, я работала до 18.
Обратились женщины, уже были у других врачей (весьма хороших, с большим уважением отношусь к коллегам), но повторные потери даже на терапии, эмбрионы здоровые.
В итоге подняла все свои записки по иммунологии и все свежие статьи и исследования, систематизировала, разложила по полочкам возможные причины, …
НИЗКИЙ ПРОГЕСТЕРОН. МОЖЕТ ЛИ ЭТО БЫТЬ ПРИЧИНОЙ БЕСПЛОДИЯ И ПОТЕРИ БЕРЕМЕННОСТИ?
Доброе утро, дорогие подписчицы! ☀️
Сегодня хочу поговорить о прогестероне и так называемой недостаточности второй фазы менструального цикла.
В июле 2026 года Американское общество репродуктивной медицины (ASRM) опубликовало обновлённые рекомендации, посвящённые диагностике и лечению недостаточности лютеиновой фазы.
✅Но для начала раз…
НАШЛИ МУТАЦИЮ MTHFR, что теперь будет?
Доброе утро ☀️
дорогие подписчицы, сегодня хочу разобрать один из анализов, который до сих пор вызывает множество вопросов у женщин, планирующих беременность.
Речь пойдёт о полиморфизмах гена MTHFR.
Этот ген участвует в обмене фолатов. Чаще всего в анализах встречаются два его варианта: C677T и A1298C.
Иногда после получения такого результата женщине рекомендуют принимать пре…
📌О КОНСУЛЬТАЦИИ ВСЕ ВОПРОСЫ ЗАДАВАЙТЕ СРАЗУ АДМИНИСТРАТОРУ,
не спрашивайте ничего про консультацию в комментариях, так как
ВАМ БУДУТ ПИСАТЬ МОШЕННИКИ!!!
Стоимость, как записаться, когда есть свободное время- пожалуйста пишите администратору!!!🙏🏼
запись на консультацию (очно или онлайн) осуществляется администратором в любой день с 10:00 до 20:00 кроме пятницы и субботы (эти дни у администратора выходные)
+7 (999) …
Хронический стресс во время беременности. Действительно ли он опасен?
Доброе утро, дорогие подписчицы! ☀️
Давайте сегодня поговорим о стрессе во время беременности и о том, что нам известно из научных исследований.
Сразу хочу обратить Ваше внимание, что обычные переживания, ссоры, испуг или плохое настроение и хронический стресс - это разные вещи.
Наш организм прекрасно приспособлен к кратковременным стрессовым си…
⚡️Издательство АСТ выпустило
книгу главного редактора «Медицинской России» Игоря Артюхова «Психотомия.
Я Вам про нее уже рассказывала.
На полке в магазинах она соседствует с произведениями Стивена Кинга, а сейчас
русский медицинский хоррор» поступил в продажу в «Литресе» (электронный формат), «Читай-городе» и на Ozon. Жанр находится на стыке хоррора, сатиры, готики, метафизического детектива и социального триллера.
Н…
Доброе утро ☀️
Давайте сегодня поговорим о вакцинации, которая позволяет защитить ребёнка от инфекции ещё до его рождения.
📋Коклюш особенно опасен для детей первых месяцев жизни. У них заболевание может протекать тяжело, сопровождаться остановками дыхания, пневмонией, требовать госпитализации. К сожалению, встречаются и летальные исходы.
💉Как же дать ребёнку иммунитет?
Один из способов заключается в вакцинации же…
Девочки, я еще сейчас разбираю письма счастья (ничего себе мы с Вами родили 🥹 , пара лет и захватим все детские сады), но если я вам еще не ответила (отвечу обязательно), напишите небольшой отзыв мне на продокторов пожалуйста, если есть минутка, ❤️ нам оказывается это очень надо 🥺
❤125🥰6😍6
Signed Ольга Каплина
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @dr_gemogyn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@dr_gemogyn edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
УРОЛОГИЯ И МЕДИЦИНА - доктор Гадзиян. @urolog_mark · 27,388 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
Валентина Магеря @valentina_magerya · 32,804 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
ДОКТОРБЛОГЕР @doctorbloger_live · 38,606 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
Нефролог I Данила Пыриков @pyrikov · 66,998 Telegram ranks this channel #97 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Каплина О.Ю., гинеколог, гемостазиолог & dr.gemogyn” (@dr_gemogyn), 21,864 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_gemogyn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.