Channel
@gms_eco
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5,071subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001752762079 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gms_eco |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gms_eco |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 5,071 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 5,074 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 5,083 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 5,086 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 5,086 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (15 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,121 |
| Reactions total | 241 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
267 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 125 | 46.8% | |
| 🔥 | 91 | 34.1% | |
| 🤣 | 20 | 7.49% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 2.62% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 2.25% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 1.50% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.749% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.749% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.375% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.375% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.375% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.375% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 267reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📍3 эмбриона = 96,8% вероятности рождения одного ребенка. Неожиданно? Именно такую статистику приводит наш репродуктолог Ирина Гаврилова. 👆🏻Важно понимать: речь не о том, что всем обязательно нужны три эмбриона. Это статистическая вероятность, а каждая ситуация индивидуальна и зависит от возраста, качества эмбрионов и других факторов. 🩵А с какой попытки ЭКО (или с каким по счету переносом) беременность наступила у …
❤11👌2
Сколько эмбрионов нужно для рождения ребенка?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5
🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂 🍂 🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂 что происходит с яйцеклеткой после разморозки, почему не каждая становится эмбрионом и сколько яйцеклеток повышают вероятность рождения ребенка Заморозку яйцеклеток с пациентской стороны мы обсудили с Екатериной, прошедшей этот путь. А теперь говорим о процессе витрификации с эмбриологом высокого уровня, к.б.н., Анной Мироновой. Кто следит за нашими соц.сетями, знает Анну — она с удовольс…
❤8
Какая тема сейчас более актуальна для вас?
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Кто узнал себя🙈😂, ставь ❤️. Вечером в пятницу только о легком и приятном, ведь нам всем очень нужно снизить уровень стресса😅. За ролик спасибо Лоре🩵.
🤣20🔥6❤4💯3😁1
Прочитать о докторе подробнее можно тут. Записаться @gmseco.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5
Дом Планирования GMS ЭКО pinned a video
Праздник 🥳 Друзья, нам в ноябре 10 лет, но сегодня день рождения нашей любимой Морозовой Анны ❤️ и мы решили чуть ускориться:). Поздравляем, обнимаем и обожаем, конечно же. Личное скажем лично:), смотри видео. 🩵За это время было немало. Начав с маленького закутка на Ямской (эх, любимая Ямская❤️🩹) и двух врачей, мы выросли до большой команды на Садовнической и 17 репродуктологов. Мы радовались нашим первым береме…
🔥29❤14
И вновь с пополнением! 🩵Еще одна радостная новость — к нашей команде присоединилась репродуктолог Ирина Гаврилова. Ирина — врач, с которым можно честно поговорить о самом хрупком: мечте о ребёнке, страхах вокруг ЭКО, возрасте, сложных диагнозах и первых шагах к репродуктологу. В её основе — серьёзная школа Воронежского государственного медицинского университета им. Н.Н. Бурденко, интернатура по акушерству и гинеко…
🔥9❤6
Ваш малыш ждет встречи с вами также сильно, как и вы❤️. Просто он может сделать для этой встречи гораздо меньше. Не сдавайтесь, прекрасные девочки💝. Этот фильм создала чудесная Анастасия.
❤55🔥8😢7💔4
С пополнением нас! Отличная новость — к команде Дома Планирования Семьи GMS ЭКО присоединилась репродуктолог Янина Самойлович. 💎Янина — врач, который помогает женщинам и парам пройти весь путь от первых шагов в планировании своего будущего (отложенное материнство) до решения сложных задач с бесплодием и невынашиванием. В её фокусе — планирование беременности, сохранение фертильности и ведение пациенток с гинекологич…
🔥20👍6❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @gms_eco. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сколько эмбрионов нужно для рождения ребенка?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какая тема сейчас более актуальна для вас?
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@gms_eco named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дом Планирования GMS ЭКО” (@gms_eco), 5,071 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gms_eco.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.