Channel
@drVailova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,097subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001697023334 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drVailova |
| Description | 🏝️Островок ДокМеда и адекватности Сюда приходят за здоровой красотой Лечусь от рака груди Сотрудничество: @doctor_vailova Канал включен в перечень РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6751a3fe8945180a7d57e619®istryType=bloggersPermission |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drVailova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 10,097 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 10,098 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 10,101 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 10,105 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 10,110 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 10,111 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (7 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 30,064 |
| Reactions total | 781 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
879 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 699 | 79.5% | |
| 🔥 | 64 | 7.28% | |
| 💯 | 31 | 3.53% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 2.05% | |
| 🙏 | 17 | 1.93% | |
| 🤬 | 17 | 1.93% | |
| 💔 | 13 | 1.48% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 0.796% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.569% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 0.569% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.228% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.114% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 879reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drVailova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwA3pWN | 1 | 4 August 2026 | 4 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Я тоже ученый-биолог и хочу согласиться. Любая молекула должна сначала должна иметь клиническую доказанность своей эффективности. Но проблема мне кажется тут снова в людях, которые пытаются нажиться на популярной теме и дезинформируют людей приписывая пептидам всевозможные свойства
❤1
Привет, я ученый, изучаю, какие ещё пептиды можно приручить. И это такая сложная история! Некоторые пептиды рады взаимодействовать со всем подряд и ожидаемые побочные эффекты перекрывают какие либо ожидаемые положительные эффекты. Пептиды могут работать внутри клетки или снаружи. Если мы ожидаем, что они будут работать внутри, то нужно их научить в нее проникать. Это не очевидно и не всегда возможно. А ещё пептиды н…
💯8❤3
После вчерашнего поста мне, кажется, нужно срочно оправдать пептиды 😁 А то вы сейчас решите, что я объявила им войну и вообще предлагаю обходить всё, что называется пептидом, за три километра. Нет. Пептиды бывают очень разными. И некоторые из них не просто полезны — они буквально изменили медицину. Например, Оземпик, Вегови, Мунджаро, Тирзетта и другие препараты для лечения диабета и ожирения — тоже пептидные преп…
❤21🔥10👍5
Даже если бы я знала, что от этого может быть рак, я бы всё равно продолжила Вот такой фразой недавно закончилась моя беседа на мероприятии. Стоя с бокалом вишневого сока на крыше одного из старинных петербургских отелей, я любовалась закатом и вела неспешный small talk с 3 женщинами. Узнав о моей специальности, одна из новых знакомых сразу же спросила про пептиды. К моменту нашей встречи девушка уже около месяца и…
❤33💯23💔12
Хочу поделиться с вами уязвимым. Редко это делаю почему-то, хотя вы меня всегда поддерживаете. Последние 2,5 недели моей жизни выдались непростыми. Много разных событий происходили одно за другим и как будто давали мне под дых, выбивали из колеи. Кто сейчас тоже проходит сложный период жизни, отмечайтесь в комментариях👇🏼 Вместе всяко веселее. Казалось бы — живи и радуйся, Юля! Ты победила рак, сложное лечение остал…
❤31
Лечение рака груди закончено. А значит, пора начинать новую главу ❤️ Нет, тематика канала кардинально не изменится. Я по-прежнему буду писать о здоровье, красоте и доказательной медицине. Просто теперь ещё больше хочется говорить о том, как жить долго, активно и с удовольствием. Чтобы энергии хватало не только дожить до 90–100 лет, но и получать удовольствие от этих лет. Поэтому пришло время немного обновить этот…
❤111❤🔥18
Да, можно и нужно. Это мягкое средство для бережного очищения кожи, которое подходит абсолютно ВСЕМ людям с сухой, раздраженной кожей и с кожными болезнями в период ремиссии.
❤10
Здравствуйте. Скажите, пожалуйста, данное масло для душа можно использовать как аналог Биодерма Атодерм, если у человека псориаз?
Поэтому отвечая на вопрос 👆🏼 про крем Mixit Atopyx C3 при лучевой терапии — да, подойдет. Лучше всего наносить его сразу же после процедуры, придя домой — так коже будет проще справиться с повреждением.
Юлия Александровна, здравсвуйте, а при лучевой этот крем подойдет?
Меня можно поздравить 🎉 Я завершила абсолютно все этапы лечения рака груди. Последним была лучевая терапия. В течение месяца мою грудь облучали радиацией, чтобы уничтожить возможные оставшиеся раковые клетки и максимально снизить риск рецидива. Одним из самых частых и неприятных осложнений такой терапии является повреждение кожи, лучевой дерматит. Мне удалось пройти лечение без него. Секрет совсем не секретный и …
❤95🔥33🙏17🎉5
Пока на питерских улицах вовсю льет дождь, поговорим про… сухость. Нет, не воздуха, разумеется, а кожи. Сухая кожа — это не только история про отопительный сезон. Она может появиться после отпуска на море, на фоне системных ретиноидов, у людей с атопическим дерматитом, псориазом и экземой, во время похудения с помощью Ozempic и аналогов, после родов и просто с возрастом. В общем, если вам кажется, что кожа сохнет,…
❤45🔥5👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @drVailova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Doctor_Vailova | Юлия Вайлова | Дерматолог, косметолог, уход за кожей” (@drVailova), 10,097 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drVailova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.