Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 삼성 WEB3 T/F장 조셉심 ️

Channel

삼성 WEB3 T/F장 조셉심 ️

@josephshim1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

565subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002523553772
TypeChannel
Username@josephshim1
DescriptionIT분야 직장인인데 WEB3 프로젝트 분석에 진심펀치중 채팅방은 https://t.me/josephshim2
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/josephshim1

Growth

5635655647 Aug 2026, 17:27 — 563 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:58 — 565 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:33 — 565 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:278 Aug 2026, 03:33
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 563–565 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:33565no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:58565+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:27563first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 565 subscribers
Avg views / post
77.4
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,548
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,380
Videos
45
Links
968

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1152.4%
😱419.0%
🔥29.52%
😁29.52%
👍14.76%
👏14.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

StripChain 세일 500달러치 구매 완료 !!! 10배만 멕여줘 !!지금 70% Cap찬듯 ㄷㄷ

1

7 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC52 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

텔방에서 욕 그만써야지..휴..존못..자진신고하고 있엇네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 😂

😁1

7 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC65 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

오우 얘네 보니까 아에 홈페이지에 커뮤니티 구성 방식 2개로 pop NFT 보유자 그리고 Sale 참여자 명시해놨네... ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 이렇게 되면 혹시 에어드랍이 pop NFT 보유자에게 상당 비중 배정될 것 같은 느낌이 되는데.. TGE만 잘되면 기대해봐도 좋을 것 같은데? ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 희망회로 지렸다.. ㅋㅋㅋㅋ (그런데...그 NFT 어떤 지갑에서 민팅했는지 까묵음 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 2년 민팅 흔적을 찾아서....)

1

7 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC63 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

StripChain sale 좀 서치해보니 재밌는데! 일단 난 소액 들어가보려함 ㅋㅋ 몇가지 포인트는, 1) 이거 '24년 5월 이태원 파티 때 NFT 추첨 뿌린거 2개 확보해둠, 그 당시 1개당 1000$ 가치라고해서 희망회로 돌리는 중 * 여기서 150명 주는 POP NFT는 1000달러 가치라고 합니다. 토큰 에어드랍 유틸리티가 있는 것 같으니 강남권 사시는 분들은 한 번 불금 공짜 술, 안주 탐할겸 가보시죠 2) 이거 좀따 9시부터 Sale 인데, 선착순 경쟁 심하겠지만 일단 되기만 하면 VC들 Sale가 FDV 1억달러 대비해서 5.5x 싸게 들어가는 거임 세일가는 $0.06078 / 약 $18.23M FDV이고, 프로젝트가 제시한 VC 진입가는 $100M FDV라서 단순 FDV 기준 업사이드는 약 5.5배 3) VC 봤을

1

7 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC46 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptopandannPhoto

StripChain $STRIP ITTC 세일, 24시간 후 오픈 세일 정보 - 오픈: 8월 7일 9PM KST - Ethereum Mainnet ETH로 참여 - 참여 금액: 최소 $250 / 최대 $10,000 - 현재 화이트리스트 신청 가능 $STRIP 토큰 구조 - Hard Floor, Soft Floor 및 Age Band 적용 - dPOS 모델을 통해 네트워크의 크립토 경제적 보안 제공 - ITTC 세일을 통해 커뮤니티 중심으로 토큰 분배 - 단순 토큰 판매가 아닌 장기적인 토큰 경제 기반 구축이 목표 참여 방법 - 홈페이지 접속 - 지갑 연결 - 이메일 입력 및 인증 - Mainnet ETH로 $STRIP 구매 화이트리스트 및 세일 페이지

7 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC49 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

조셉의 글로벌 매크로 경제 뉴스 Outline (2026.08.07) 1. 반도체/AI - 핵심키워드 : 폴리실리콘, CXMT, 오픈소스AI - 주요 내용 : 미국의 폴리실리콘 관세 부과, 중국의 저가 AI/메모리 공세 및 이에 대응하는 한국의 전략적 고민 2. 지정학 및 무역 - 핵심 키워드 : 미중 정상회담, 드론 규제, 관세 - 주요 내용 : 9월 정상회담 앞두고 AI/로봇/드론으로 확대된 기술 전쟁과 상호 보복성 수출 통제 격화 3. 금융/시장 - 핵심 키워드 : 코스피 변동성, 반도체 편중, 고용 - 주요 내용 : 반도체 중심의 경제 성장으로 반도체 작시 우려와 고용 시장의 구조적 문제 제기 4. 글로벌 이슈 - 핵심 키워드 : 일본 지진, 6G, EU 무역 - 주요 내용 : 구마모토 지진 후속 조

1

7 Aug 2026, 00:39 UTC52 viewsread 8 August 2026

트럼프 대통령, 8/6일 반도체 제조 및 태양광 발전 핵심 원자재인 폴리실리콘 및 폴리실리콘 파생상품에 대한 수입 제재 조치 부과! - 중국등 외국의 덤핑 조치로 미국 반도체 생산에 피해를 입혔다고... - 폴리실리콘, 잉곳, 웨이퍼, 태양전지, 태양광 모듈 대상.. 최저 정상거래가격 이상으로 수입해야하고, 그 이하로 수입하면 차액을 관세로 때려버림! - 미국 내에 생산시설 지으면 혜택 줌.. ➡️ 미국이 반도체 제조 공장을 미국으로 지으라고 계속 압박하는데, 어제는 이제 웨이퍼 시작으로 향후에 반도체 원자재 공장까지 미국에 지으라고 압박할 것 같음.. 이러다 반도체 공급망 .. 미국에 다 뺏길라...무서워 🤮

7 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC62 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

美공화 “표현 자유 위축”…쿠팡 이어 韓 ‘가짜뉴스법’ 정조준 미국 공화당 의원 형님들, 최근 시행된 정통망법 개정안에 대해 “허위 정보의 정의와 법 집행 방식의 세부 사항을 제시하지 않았다”고 주장 ㄷㄷㄷ ➡️ 텔방장 형들에게는 좋은 소식 ㅋㅋㅋ 표현의 자유를 달라~!!!

1👏1

6 Aug 2026, 23:49 UTC65 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

일본 ‘인간용 냉장고’ 벌써 200대 팔렸다…“10분만에 체온 뚝” 한국 수입이 시급하다..휴..더웡!!!! 💦 그런데 저거...고장나서 문잠기면...어찌 되는겨 ..

6 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC85 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

오늘의 결론 : 한국인들은 겉보기와 다르게 세ㄱ수 를 많이 좋아한다..

2

6 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC84 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

다시 한번 희망회로 돌려봐? $SNDK 컴퓨팅에 대한 수요는 끝이 없고 이 추세가 곧 멈출 것 같지 않음. 사용 가능한 메모리는 항상 부족하며 무한한 수요를 가진 것 중 하나, 나는 제본스의 역설이 여기에 적용된다고 강력하게 믿고있음 ㅋㅋ 에이전트 시대는 불과 몇 달 전에 시작되었고 AI는 매일 발전하고 있음. 왜 이게 빨리 저문다고 생각하는지 모르겠음 나는 모든 AI 인프라 공급망에 대해 장기적인 우상향 유지할 예정 !!

6 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC71 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ARC 500점 받은 형들은 https://community.arc.io/home/clubs/architects/overview 여기 들어가서 신청하고 기다리면됨 ㅋㅋ

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @josephshim1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 950,287 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“삼성 WEB3 T/F장 조셉심 ️” (@josephshim1), 565 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/josephshim1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.