Обитель диванного спецназа с 2019 года. Первый и единственный
@rtb_011 - по вопросам сотрудничества (реклама, просьбы и предложения).
По рекламе: @effective100
Created
22 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 58 days, net -274. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 130,671–131,055 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Oct 2026, 11:39
130,737
-10
18 Sept 2026, 13:36
130,747
-23
16 Sept 2026, 07:37
130,770
-25
14 Sept 2026, 12:17
130,795
+4
13 Sept 2026, 00:20
130,791
+51
11 Sept 2026, 04:37
130,740
-59
8 Sept 2026, 04:38
130,799
-1
5 Sept 2026, 00:01
130,800
-9
3 Sept 2026, 09:37
130,809
+56
2 Sept 2026, 06:36
130,753
+38
1 Sept 2026, 05:54
130,715
-33
31 Aug 2026, 06:06
130,748
-41
30 Aug 2026, 03:25
130,789
-45
29 Aug 2026, 04:28
130,834
-20
28 Aug 2026, 05:03
130,854
-23
27 Aug 2026, 03:06
130,877
-5
26 Aug 2026, 06:22
130,882
-27
25 Aug 2026, 03:04
130,909
-18
23 Aug 2026, 15:48
130,927
+114
22 Aug 2026, 00:39
130,813
first reading
Engagement
418 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 123 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.94%
avg views ÷ 130,737 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,400
195 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
195
of 418 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026
Posts held
418 (5 August 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Views total
2,025,252
Reactions total
30,296
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Oct 2026, 10:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈38,800
Videos
≈4,490
Links
≈3,660
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 42m
Average length
1m 29s
Measured directly from 69 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
69,321 reactions across 406 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🫡
28,310
40.8%
❤
14,401
20.8%
👍
9,716
14.0%
🔥
4,538
6.55%
🙏
3,383
4.88%
🤬
3,373
4.87%
😁
1,161
1.67%
😢
1,027
1.48%
❤🔥
926
1.34%
🤨
839
1.21%
🤔
679
0.98%
😭
309
0.446%
🤝
238
0.343%
👏
216
0.312%
🤯
122
0.176%
😱
75
0.108%
😨
8
0.012%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 417 of the 418 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70,970 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 418 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В Польше прошли учения «Стальное кольцо», которое организовало спецподразделение JWK.
В учениях также приняли участие военнослужащие СпН НАТО, полиции и санитарная авиация. В ходе учений также закладывались различные сценарии, среди которых: оказание помощи беременной женщине с остановкой сердца, оказание помощи пострадавшему после взрыва СВУ и другие травмы и болезни.
@okspn
-Кто-нибудь, высуньтесь в окно, с вами будет говорить подполковник группы «Альфа»!
33 года назад, 4 октября 1993 года, в Москве сотрудники «Альфы» и «Вымпела» отказались выполнить приказ Бориса Ельцина и взять штурмом Белый дом.
Несмотря на огонь неизвестных снайперов и гибель сотрудника «А» младшего лейтенанта Геннадия Сергеева, сотрудники «Альфы», как и их коллеги из «Вымпела» отказались пролить кровь. В те часы …
Коммандос морской пехоты Великобритании во время учений «LION PROTECTOR 26» на Фарерских островах 24-26 сентября.
Морпехи отработали проникновение и досмотр судна в рамках ARF SOMTG. Учения проводились совместно с Данией и были призваны отработать совместные действия на воде.
@okspn
4 октября 1993 года силы JSOC завершили операцию «Готический змей», проводившуюся в Могадишо для захвата министров Айдида. Позднее, благодаря фильму Ридли Скотта «Падение Черного ястреба», операция стала одной из самых знаменитых операций американского спецназа.
Для участия в операции выделялось 50 человек из эскадрона «С» «Дельты», 4 взвода 3-го батальона 75-го полка рейнджеров и вертолеты 160-го авиаполка: общее р…
Оператор «Дельты» сержант-майор Томас Пейн во время работы в группе личной охраны генерал Скота Миллера в Афганистане.
В 2020 году Дональд Трамп вручил Пейну Медаль Почета за его действия в Ираке в 2015 году. Он стал первым оператором «Дельты» удостоенным высшей награды США с 1993 года, когда MoH посмертно получили сержанты Гари Гордон и Рэнди Шугарт, погибшие при обороне места падения «Супер 6-4» в Могадишо.
@oksp…
📈#Итогимесяца
📈#Итоги
⚔️ Актуализация карты по итогам Сентября на карта-сво.рф
♦️Наибольшие результаты за сентябрь были зафиксированы на Харьковском, Дружковском, Добропольском, Андроновском и Запорожском направлениях.
Общее продвижение:
🔴 Заняли - 586,9 км²
🔵 Отошли - 154,66 км²
📈 Итоговая - 432,24 км²
🌐 Интерактивная карта
💬 Max | 🌐 ВК | 🐈 Z-комитет
Разведчик-снайпер 3-й гв. отдельной бригады армейского спецназа России старший прапорщик Виталий «Дед» Шаповалов в Пальмире, 2016 год.
🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖
@okspn
Сотрудники NPJ PPZ полиции Словакии во время межведомственных учений.
@okspn
❤22🤬7🤔3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 418 posts we hold for @okspn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@okspn edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 113 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 125 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@okspn named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@huntsman888 named in 1 post, 18 September 2026 – 18 September 2026 · confirmed gone 5 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Объявления о работе в Африке @bold_advertising_agency · 43,445 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
Astra Militarum [Z] @astramilitarum · 21,339 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 September 2026
FTF @tactical_flava · 30,173 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 16 September 2026
ВДВ Псков ZOV @vdvpskovz · 25,507 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 September 2026
Arm.Taktik27 @Arm_taktik27 · 33,974 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 September 2026
Герои спецоперации Z @heroesofZ · 37,723 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
ПИСАРЬ ИЗ СПЕЦНАZА @specnaz_com · 27,533 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
Владлен Татарский @vladlentatarsky · 173,972 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
Роман Хорс @combat_cypress · 234,415 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 September 2026
Уголок Ситха @Ugolok_Sitha · 49,376 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
FRONT SIDE OF THE MEDAL @rsotmvideo · 93,051 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
БП (Боевая Подготовка) СпН, Разведка, ВДВ, ... @combattraining365 · 29,191 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 9 September 2026
Рустам Ковальски и Kowalski team @kowalski_team · 23,422 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 18 September 2026
98 гвардейская ВДД @vdd98 · 23,873 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
Белые дяди в Африке🌴 @wagner_group2022 · 123,150 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 August 2026
Гостович 🎖 @ghostovich · 23,006 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 20 September 2026
НВП73 @nvp_73 · 26,780 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 September 2026
Вежливые люди @vezhlivo_ru · 74,708 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
АРХАНГЕЛ СПЕЦНАЗА @arx_spn · 1,037,181 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Оркестр Вагнера @orchestra_w1 · 25,564 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 29 September 2026
Чёрные гусары @blackhussars · 27,690 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 September 2026
Охотники за головами @heads_hunters · 29,971 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
ХИЛЕР l HEALER @HealerTacMed · 131,212 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
Unfair Advantage @unfair_advantage_tg · 24,578 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 144 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
6 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
FSB Special Purpose Center(en.wikipedia.org) “…26, 2022){{Cite web |title=Канал специального назначения|url=https://t.me/okspn/41482 |language=ru-RU}} Operates in the territories of the [[Luhansk…” read 13 September 2026
Козлов, Сергей Владиславович(ru.wikipedia.org) “…Владиславович Козлов''' ([[19 мая]] [[1957]]—[[2025]])[https://t.me/okspn/41096] — советский военный деятель, [[майор]] [[Главное разведывательное…” read 13 September 2026
Милицкий, Сергей Владимирович(ru.wikipedia.org) “…года в возрасте 55 лет после тяжёлой болезни{{cite web|url=https://t.me/okspn/34431|title=На 56 году жизни после тяжелой болезни скончался ветеран…” read 13 September 2026
Потери Вооружённых сил России в Сирии(ru.wikipedia.org) “…ru/2023/11/23/320|url-status=live}}{{Cite web |url=http://t.me/okspn/37641 |title=Telegram: View @okspn…” read 13 September 2026
Умершие в марте 2026 года(ru.wikipedia.org) “…российский военнослужащий, [[Герой Российской Федерации]] (2024); ДТП [https://t.me/okspn/44232].
* {{iw|Мацялко, Михаил Алексеевич||uk|Мацялко Михайло Олексійович}}…” read 13 September 2026
Центр специального назначения ФСБ(ru.wikipedia.org) “…(спецподразделение)|Управление «Д» (Донбасс)]] — создано 26 декабря 2022 года[https://t.me/okspn/41482 Канал специального назначения], действует на территории…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Канал специального назначения” (@okspn), 130,737 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okspn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.