Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Родная 98-я (ВДВ России)

Channel

Родная 98-я (ВДВ России)

@rodnaya98vdd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,078subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002328522137
TypeChannel
Username@rodnaya98vdd
DescriptionОфициальный телеграм канал 98-й Гвардейской воздушно-десантной Свирской Краснознамённой орденов Кутузова, Александра Невского и Суворова дивизии #GG7Q0
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rodnaya98vdd

Growth

11,04611,07811,0625 August 2026 — 11,050 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,050 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,048 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,046 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,048 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,053 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,054 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,062 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,064 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,057 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,067 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,078 subscribers5 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,041–11,083 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:0511,078+11
15 Aug 2026, 18:1311,067+10
14 Aug 2026, 07:1811,057-7
13 Aug 2026, 00:0711,064+2
11 Aug 2026, 22:5511,062+8
11 Aug 2026, 01:5811,054+1
10 Aug 2026, 03:4011,053+5
9 Aug 2026, 03:5211,048+2
8 Aug 2026, 05:2711,046-2
7 Aug 2026, 08:3811,048-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:3711,050no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:0911,050first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.6%
avg views ÷ 11,078 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,730
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held29 (5 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total50,164
Reactions total859
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,840
Videos
2,040
Links
678

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16m 22s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

798 reactions across 27 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
29937.5%
👍26333.0%
🔥11814.8%
🙏739.15%
😱273.38%
💯60.752%
40.501%
👏40.501%
👌20.251%
❤‍🔥10.125%
🕊10.125%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 859reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 29 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rodnaya98vdd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC444 views11 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @russian_airborneVideo

Готов вскрывать опорники как консервные банки 🪖 Короткий обзор экипировки бойца 98-й дивизии ВДВ перед выходом на боевую задачу. За плечами у него уже не один штурм в районе Часов Яра, опыт огромный, а настрой – исключительно на победу! 👉 В первом эшелоне у него всегда под рукой медицина, связь, защита. Вооружен боец проверенным АК-12 с коллиматором. 💣 На это боевое задание боец с позывным "Тигр" взял с собой тер

6🙏3👍2

16 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC≈1,420 views60 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

Российский боец из Дагестана Ислам Махачев победил ирландца Иэна Гэрри. Вышел с флагом России и заявил, что Россия №1 мире

33👍19🔥8

16 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈1,300 views24 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @rvvoenkorPhoto

‼️🇺🇦🔥Мощные пожары в Киеве после ракетного удара Пылают объекты врага в Оболонском и Голосеевском районах столицы после прилётов ракет. ⚠️Подписаться на RV: MAX | t.me/RVvoenkor

🔥15👍63

15 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,810 views36 reactionsread 17 August 2026

ДОКУМЕНТАЛЬНЫЙ ФИЛЬМ ТЕЛЕКАНАЛА "ЗВЕЗДА" «Стальная дивизия: дорога на Часов Яр» 👈 Ко дню ВДВ, на телеканале "Звезда" вышел большой документальный проект посвященный подвигу наших подразделений по освобождению стратегического Часов Яра! Всем обязательно к просмотру!

313👍2

14 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC≈4,390 views19 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🅰️ 14 августа 1941 года на Ленинградском фронте под Кингисеппом состоялся первый залп гвардейских реактивных минометов БМ-13, созданных под руководством П.Н. Дегтярева. Эта батарея, прибывшая из Москвы 28 июля, стала первой в своем роде. К декабрю 1941 года в Красной Армии было сформировано 8 полков и 42 отдельных дивизиона реактивных минометов, что составляло около 500 боевых машин. В ноябре началось создание дивиз

11👍8

13 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC≈2,140 views36 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Более 100 спортсменов-парашютистов в составе 14 команд принимают участие в 66-м чемпионате Воздушно-десантных войск по парашютному спорту На базе нашего соединения стартовал 66-й чемпионат Воздушно-десантных войск по парашютному спорту. В ближайшие 10 дней более 100 спортсменов-парашютистов будут оспаривать звание лучших парашютистов ВДВ. Для участия в чемпионате заявлены команды, представляющих все соединения и вои

👍2010🔥5😱1

12 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,950 views41 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

🇷🇺 Наши бойцы мелькают на федеральных телеканалах! Страна должна знать своих "Героев"! Работайте, братья! 💪

21👍11💯6😱2🙏1

12 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC≈2,010 views34 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

❗️Вашему вниманию свежая подборка боевой работы подразделений дивизии в зоне ответственности, со статистикой в конце! Продолжаем бить врага! Отличная работа, парни! 👍

🔥14🙏13👍6😱1

11 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC≈1,650 views33 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🪂 В новом номере журнала «Армейский сборник» Министерства обороны Российской Федерации опубликована большая статья о нашем боевом товарище, Герое Российской Федерации, гвардии лейтенанте Андрее Волоскове, офицере 299-го гвардейского Ярославского полка! Обязательно к прочтению! Выдержки из статьи представлены в посте 🇷🇺

👍16🙏9🔥5😱2❤‍🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈1,580 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

«Союз десантников Кинешмы» — в «Армейском сборнике» В новом номере журнала «Армейский сборник» Министерства обороны Российской Федерации опубликована большая статья о работе Союза десантников города Кинешмы и Ивановской области. Материал под названием «Мы вам поможем» размещён в № 8 за август 2026 года, на страницах 76–78. В статье рассказывается о работе ветеранов ВДВ по оказанию помощи военнослужащим: передаче т

👍105😱2

10 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,300 views30 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @russian_airborneVideo

Засада сверху: «крылатая пехота» не оставляет шансов противнику Ивановские десантники уничтожили диверсионно-разведывательную группу противника на Ореховском направлении. Источник — Минобороны России @russian_airborne На связи и в МАХ

👍21🔥8😱1

9 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC≈1,650 views36 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @rvvoenkorVideo

‼️🇷🇺🇺🇦 Массовую ликвидацию пехоты врага показывает Минобороны ▪️Дроноводы «Запада» сорвали ротацию подразделений ВСУ на Краснолиманском направлении, массово ликвидируя личный состав противника. ⚠️Подписаться на RV: MAX | t.me/RVvoenkor

🔥26👍9😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @rodnaya98vdd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 78,280 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Родная 98-я (ВДВ России)” (@rodnaya98vdd), 11,078 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rodnaya98vdd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.