Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

НЕ*АТЛЕТ

@athlete_axc

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,727subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002576142800
TypeChannel
Username@athlete_axc
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/athlete_axc

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,69412,74012,7175 August 2026 — 12,696 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,696 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,694 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,720 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,735 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,740 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,739 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,736 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,730 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,727 subscribers12,7275 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,687–12,747 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:3712,727-3
13 Aug 2026, 05:5612,730-6
12 Aug 2026, 07:3512,736-3
11 Aug 2026, 07:3112,739-1
9 Aug 2026, 10:3612,740+5
8 Aug 2026, 10:0612,735+15
7 Aug 2026, 07:4212,720+26
6 Aug 2026, 08:1112,694-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:3212,696no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:2912,696first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 1 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
156.5%
avg views ÷ 12,727 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,900
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held24 (1 February 202612 August 2026)
Views total159,350
Reactions total2,682
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 41s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,649 reactions across 22 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,35245.1%
👍2,34424.3%
🔥2,06621.4%
😁8879.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,608reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC≈1,630 views165 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Военный грим, знали что это? В нашем подразделении люди выходя на задачу наносят на лицо маскировочный грим, для чего это, спросите вы. Лицо и открытые части тела — одна из самых демаскирующих частей тела. Даже если боец одет в идеальный маскхалат, открытая кожа будет светиться в любой прибор наблюдения — от бинокля до тепловизора. Задача боевого грима — визуально деформировать рельеф лица и сблизить его цвет с окр

👍10645🔥14

11 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC≈3,320 views248 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🤙О внешнем виде, экипировке и медиа. Всем привет! Сегодня затронем болезненную для нас тему — форма одежды, грязные и чистые вещи, слабая медийка. Очень часто задают вопросы: «Почему Украина и Америка снимают материалы о своей армии, бойцах и прочее, а мы — нет?» Ответ прост — нежелание. Хотя у нас много воинов, которые отлично выглядят, стреляют и обладают большим боевым опытом. Посмотрите на наших спецназов/раз

👍14760🔥41

8 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC≈3,410 views279 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🤙Рабочие вечера на полигоне со вторым админом ( он кстати 300 ) Приведение новых «игрушек» к нормальному бою — дело важное. Кстати, многие любят говорить «пристреливать», но как однажды сказал мой командир группы: «Пристреливают зверей, а оружие приводят к нормальному бою». Кстати, заметил одну особенность, что «мушковод» стал очень большой редкостью в подразделениях, теперь этот прибор на вес золота.

183🔥72👍24

7 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC≈60,000 views276 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇷🇺🤙RANGE DAY. Немного постреляли АК-3, кстати многие в училищах даже не знают что это такое, но я расскажу: АК-3 - это стандартная дисциплина, «стрельба из штатного или табельного оружия», которая выполняется из автомата Калашникова, в положении стоя, с колена и лежа по мишени №4, на расстоянии 100 метров. А так, вы можете увидеть красивое, качественное видео, показатель как можно красиво двигаться в серой медийке

160👍65🔥51

6 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈74,600 views333 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇷🇺ORTHODOX MILITARY GROUP. 🤙ARCHANGEL OF SPECIAL FORCES. Немного внесли красок в нашу серую медийку. Такими видео мы не просто играем мышцами, мы показываем людям красивую картину службы в подразделениях СпН. Пример того, как работает противник в этом направлении - от банальных съемок на тренировках и до работы в бою. При этом показывается работа подразделения в лайф режиме, чтобы быть ближе к зрителю, быть ближе

199🔥92👍41😁1

3 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC≈5,270 views344 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Про взрыв в ресторане. Здесь есть сразу серьёзная проблема, о которой необходимо говорить и принимать контрмеры. Проблема заключается в недостаточной информационно-разъяснительной работе с молодёжью. О чём идёт речь? Террористкой-смертницей оказалась обычная молодая девушка. По имеющейся информации, её завербовала украинская сторона с помощью запугивания. Если бы молодые люди не просто знали, а осознавали, что наши

👍27645🔥21😁2

2 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈5,200 views537 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

С Днём ВДВ! Всех причастных от всей души хочу крепко поздравить с нашим праздником! Для меня большая честь служить в ВДВ с 2017 года. Служба в десантных войсках всегда была моей мечтой: носить берет и тельняшку. Сегодня, как и в предыдущие годы СВО, я встречаю этот день в кругу «боевого братства» — с настоящими жёсткими мужчинами. Желаю вам мирного неба, крепкого здоровья, мира вашим близким и скорейшей нашей обще

372🔥110👍55

31 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC≈5,920 views500 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Немного хулиганства 🤪

🔥316115👍47😁22

13 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC≈10,500 views577 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

😁360107🔥71👍39

13 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC≈8,920 views675 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Что вы, рэксы? Соскучились? И я по вам всем.

467🔥141👍59😁8

6 Jun 2026, 17:02 UTC≈13,100 views667 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет. Я иногда буду появляться тут, иногда меня накрывает и это перебивает то, что я выгорел. Я не вижу тенденции, чтоб молодые и заряженные пацаны стремились попасть в ссо/спецназ/другие крутые подразделения. Нет даже мотивационных крутых роликов про это (я про сборы с подрастающим поколениями, играми и так далее, вообще молчу). Кого не спросишь, все говорят «Нафиг надо?». А если и идут, то являются пассажи

422👍190🔥47😁8

17 May 2026, 07:08 UTC≈13,200 views700 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Всем привет 👋 Да, увы здесь теперь редко выходят посты, все из за моего нежелания, выгорания и куча еще других оправданий. Смотрю, как БПЛА летят на Москву и область, и возникает закономерный вопрос: где FPV-перехватчики? Где МОГи? Вся надежда на выключенный интернет и белые списки? На кучу блокировок? Уж лучше закупить пикапы, оборудовать мобильные группы, организовать стрелковую подготовку и работе с FPV. У нас

455👍155🔥78😁12

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @athlete_axc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 13,077 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НЕ*АТЛЕТ” (@athlete_axc), 12,727 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/athlete_axc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.