Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Южный фронт

Channel

Южный фронт

@yuzhny_front_ZOV

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,529subscribers

+149 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001977233415
TypeChannel
Username@yuzhny_front_ZOV
Created13 May 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yuzhny_front_ZOV

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,36320,91720,6405 August 2026 — 20,380 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,380 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,384 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,379 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,378 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,367 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,363 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,567 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,676 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,670 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,917 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,907 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,885 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,882 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,850 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,840 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,818 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,801 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,792 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,775 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,765 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,757 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,742 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,733 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,734 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,723 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,708 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,702 subscribers4 September 2026 — 20,693 subscribers7 September 2026 — 20,662 subscribers10 September 2026 — 20,632 subscribers12 September 2026 — 20,599 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,580 subscribers16 September 2026 — 20,562 subscribers18 September 2026 — 20,529 subscribers20,5295 August 202618 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +149. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,280–21,000 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 04:1820,529-33
16 Sept 2026, 01:0020,562-18
14 Sept 2026, 08:3620,580-19
12 Sept 2026, 20:1820,599-33
10 Sept 2026, 22:3920,632-30
7 Sept 2026, 20:3720,662-31
4 Sept 2026, 22:5720,693-9
3 Sept 2026, 05:5820,702-6
2 Sept 2026, 04:0320,708-15
1 Sept 2026, 06:3520,723-11
31 Aug 2026, 03:2520,734+1
30 Aug 2026, 06:0420,733-9
29 Aug 2026, 08:5520,742-15
28 Aug 2026, 07:1320,757-8
27 Aug 2026, 05:3420,765-10
26 Aug 2026, 06:1420,775-17
25 Aug 2026, 02:4820,792-9
23 Aug 2026, 15:4820,801-17
22 Aug 2026, 00:4820,818-22
20 Aug 2026, 22:1620,840first reading

Engagement

428 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.43%
avg views ÷ 20,529 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
144 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
144
of 428 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 143 of 144 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held428 (5 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total190,034
Reactions total2,133
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 18:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 16m
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 192 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,230 reactions across 400 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,89430.4%
🔥1,84329.6%
74011.9%
😁3976.37%
🤬3205.14%
🤡2584.14%
🙏2313.71%
🤣1472.36%
851.36%
👏751.20%
💯691.11%
😡440.706%
💊270.433%
👎220.353%
😱190.305%
🤔180.289%
❤‍🔥130.209%
🤯110.177%
🤩60.096%
😢40.064%
5 further kinds70.112%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 418 of the 428 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,525 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 428 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 428 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yuzhny_front_ZOV. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 428 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 18:02 UTC229 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

‼️🇺🇦🔥Киев сегодня под массированной атакой новых ракето-дронов "Герань-5" 🔸Атака этими аппаратами идёт второй день. Они созданы по обычной аэродинамической схеме на основе иранского технологического прототипа Karrar и существенно отличается от предыдущих поршневых моделей этой серии ("летающих крыльев" типа Shahed-136), пишут вражеские ресурсы. 🔸Двигатель: китайский турбореактивный Telefly TF-TJ2000A. 🔸Крейсерская с

👍5

3 Sept 2026, 17:11 UTC450 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

‼️Украинские силовики в очередной раз пытаются "нагнуть" друг друга: Момент начала перестрелки в Киеве. На кадрах стороны сначала разговаривают на повышенных тонах на русском языке, после чего раздаётся один выстрел, а затем ещё серия. Полезная работа! Подпишитесь на Южный фронт|Предложить новость

🔥3🤣1🤬1

3 Sept 2026, 16:26 UTC602 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

‼️🇷🇺 Хорошие новости от ВПК для наших бойцов: разработан новый снаряд для "Гиацинта". Российские артиллеристы получили новые боеприпасы. Снаряды «Беркут» позволяют 152-миллиметровым пушкам «Гиацинт» стрелять на 40 км. "Действующие в зоне специальной военной операции российские артиллеристы получили новые дальнобойные боеприпасы «Беркут» для 152-миллиметровых пушек. Они с высокой точностью бьют на дальность до 40 км

👍11🔥21

3 Sept 2026, 15:36 UTC660 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

‼️Актуализация данных на Славянском направлении. 🔸Подразделения ВС РФ продвинулись возле населенного пункта Федоровка Вторая, а также продвигаются в направлении Николаевка. Подпишитесь на Южный фронт|Предложить новость

🙏62

3 Sept 2026, 14:50 UTC665 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @UVB_BerVideo

💥💥💥Кадры боевой работы подразделения БпС батальона на Краматорско-Дружковском направлении. Точное попадание в цель!!! Уничтожены танк Т-64, автомобильная техника и живая сила противника. Победа будет за нами!!!

🔥131

3 Sept 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,060 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

‼️Слив с телефона пленного военнослужащего 30 ОМБр: на кадрах командир штурмового взвода избивает подчиненного, за то, что тот не хотел наполнять карман комбрига (известного своими поборами для личного обогащения подполковника Евгения Кочервея (позывной "Алмаз")), поэтому сбежал с позиции, но был пойман и отправлен на очередной штурм. 🔸Напомним, что 30 ОМБр является одной из скандально известных бригад в составе В

7🤡2😱1

3 Sept 2026, 13:34 UTC766 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

‼️🔥 удары по тылам ВСУ: 🔸В Борисполе Киевской области снова горит после утренних ударов (видео 1-4) 🔸в Днепре (Днепропетровске) "Бандеролью" атакован склад "Новой почты" (видео 5-7) Подпишитесь на Южный фронт|Предложить новость

👍10🔥3

3 Sept 2026, 12:34 UTC797 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

‼️ВС РФ - бесплатная доставка УАБов для ВСУ: 🔸Последствия утренних ударов УМПК в Краматорске. 🔸Под удар попало здание горотдела полиции и прокуратуры. Подпишитесь на Южный фронт|Предложить новость

🔥133

3 Sept 2026, 11:35 UTC873 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

‼️Украинские войска ежемесячно теряют 8-12 тысяч человек, сообщил Путин Другие заявления главы государства: 🔸 Уровень мотивации в рядах ВСУ сейчас низкий, а процент дезертиров большой; 🔸Число потерь у Украины значительно больше, чем людей, которые поступают в ВСУ в рамках насильственной мобилизации; 🔸 Темп движения российской армии в зоне СВО нарастает. Подпишитесь на Южный фронт|Предложить новость

👍16🔥21🤡1

2 Sept 2026, 19:15 UTC622 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

‼️Украина без ПВО: Киеву потребуется несколько лет для строительства заводов по выпуску систем Patriot, даже если страна получит необходимую лицензию от США, заявил госсекретарь Рубио. 🔸Ранее Трамп выступил против передачи такой лицензии Украине. 🔸При этом Рубио сообщил, что переговоры все-таки ведутся. Подпишитесь на Южный фронт|Предложить новость

😁8

2 Sept 2026, 18:20 UTC825 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

‼️💥🇺🇦Последствия прилёта шести ФАБов по лесополосе, где располагались позиции ВСУ Кадры со стороны противника. Подпишитесь на Южный фронт|Предложить новость

🔥11

2 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC903 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

‼️🇺🇸🇺🇦 Министр финансов США обвинил Украину в мировом энергокризисе и росте по всей планете 🔸Бессент заявил Fox News, что удары Украины по российским энергетическим объектам и перерабатывающим мощностям стали одним из факторов нынешнего энергетического шока. 🔸«Украина решила взорвать российские энергетические объекты и перерабатывающие мощности. Это создаёт давление на цены на топливо во всём мире», — сказал Бессент

🤣13

Showing the 12 most recent of 428 posts we hold for @yuzhny_front_ZOV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@yuzhny_front_ZOV edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

ЗАПОРОЖСКИЙ ФРОНТ
@ZA_FROHT · 84,272
11 posts
ZАЧИСТКА
@zachistka_ua · 41,163
8 posts
DnevnikVostoka
@DnevnikVostoka · 3,154
5 posts
ЮЖНЫЙ РУБЕЖ
@SouthernRepublic · 11,276
5 posts
Херсонский Вестник
@HersonVestnik · 47,809
4 posts
Сибирское объединение
@Sib_army · 13,333
4 posts
Оперативный простор
@operationall_space · 72,763
4 posts
Рядовой на передовой
@frontline_pvt · 30,466
3 posts
Охранитель
@rusmonstr · 12,004
3 posts
Секреты Винакоса
@Secrets_of_Vinakos · 18,264
2 posts
ОПЕРАТОР АК | ОТДАЧА
@operator_ak12 · 11,682
2 posts
verumreactor
@verumreactor · 4,486
2 posts
Берлога Z 🇷🇺
@Berloga0101 · 20,331
1 post
Inside 🅉 Donetsk
@Doninside · 24,472
1 post
Обозреватель Z
@RussObzorZ · 4,052
1 post
Отряд Сибирь🦇
@SiberiaSpecial · 1,796
1 post
ЛУГАНСКИЙ СВЯЗНОЙ
@Sinkovka_Kupyansk · 9,418
1 post
Владимир Орлов
@Vladimir_Orlov1977 · 5,731
1 post
WarDonbass
@WarDonbass · 51,322
1 post
Боевые Технологии
@battle_technic · 17,007
1 post
Боевой дневник
@boevoj_dnevnik · 64
1 post
Работайте, братья!
@btr80 · 147,605
1 post
ХОХОЛ И УКРОП
@doctor_botox999 · 1,240
1 post
Портфель Генштаба
@genshtab24 · 83,470
1 post
Military hub | СВО, FPV, дроны, БПЛА
@mil_hub · 25,260
1 post
Небесный Артист | СВО
@nebesnij_artist_svo · 471
1 post
Новости | Мировые события 📰
@nowosti_news24 · 4,835
1 post
V🇷🇺Рука Кремля🇷🇺Z
@thehandofthekremlin · 21,972
1 post
Выгрузка
@ypjo1 · 3
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Оперативный простор
@operationall_space · 72,763
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
Рядовой на передовой
@frontline_pvt · 30,466
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
Бригада "Север-V" ДК ВС РФ
@Sever_Z · 40,178
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
98 гвардейская ВДД
@vdd98 · 24,001
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
Народная милиция ДНР
@nm_dnr · 47,812
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Чёрные гусары
@blackhussars · 27,685
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 September 2026
Бешеные псы
@urga_74 · 31,550
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
Крылатые
@russian_airborne · 49,773
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
ЗАПОРОЖСКИЙ ФРОНТ
@ZA_FROHT · 84,272
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Южный фронт” (@yuzhny_front_ZOV), 20,529 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuzhny_front_ZOV.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.