Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 9 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 11 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 5,496 comparable posts for this entry, running 24 May 2017 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 11, the earliest publisher we hold is @rkadyrov_95 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 10 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
12 measurements spanning 13 days, net +89,841. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,059,485–2,193,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 13:22
2,164,830
-3,333
17 Aug 2026, 09:45
2,168,163
-4,350
15 Aug 2026, 18:28
2,172,513
-5,837
14 Aug 2026, 04:15
2,178,350
+69,871
12 Aug 2026, 21:37
2,108,479
+29,852
11 Aug 2026, 23:42
2,078,627
-19,945
10 Aug 2026, 20:15
2,098,572
-21,568
9 Aug 2026, 18:23
2,120,140
+12,212
8 Aug 2026, 21:11
2,107,928
-2,037
7 Aug 2026, 23:54
2,109,965
-2,904
7 Aug 2026, 00:00
2,112,869
+37,880
6 Aug 2026, 00:41
2,074,989
first reading
Engagement
6,475 posts held, back to 22 May 2017 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,338 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.53%
avg views ÷ 2,164,830 subscribers
Avg views / post
54,800
76 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
76
of 6,475 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
6,475 (22 May 2017 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
4,168,100
Reactions total
124,994
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 52m
Average length
2m 24s
Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 32 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (2 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 31of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 11 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 22.8% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 58.8% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 30,500 views — 1.41% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 37,500).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
86,837 reactions across 52 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
63,488
73.1%
❤
17,441
20.1%
🔥
3,377
3.89%
👏
2,531
2.91%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,932,626reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 June 2025 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, ещё одна страница беспрецедентной гуманитарной миссии Регионального общественного фонда имени Героя России Ахмата-Хаджи Кадырова в секторе Газа. На этот раз в центре внимания оказались самые беззащитные — тяжелобольные дети.
В специализированной детской больнице имени доктора Абдель Азиза Ар-Рантиси в осажденной Газе финансовую помощь получили 90 детей, борющихся с онкологическими заболеваниями и крайним ист…
Друзья! Региональный общественный фонд имени Героя России Ахмата-Хаджи Кадырова @fond_kadyrova продолжает беспрецедентную благотворительную акцию для угнетённых жителей Газы. Как мы уже заявляли ранее, эта масштабная миссия поэтапно охватит до миллиона нуждающихся жителей Палестины. Эта гуманитарная инициатива — наш вклад в облегчение страданий тех, кто оказался в жутких условиях жизни.
На этом этапе продукты первой…
Сегодня «Колизей» в Грозном стал настоящей ареной большого бокса! В спорт-холле состоялся масштабный вечер профессионального бокса, посвящённый 75-летию Первого Президента Чеченской Республики, Героя России Ахмата-Хаджи Кадырова. Я с большим удовольствием посетил это яркое спортивное событие.
15 поединков, сильнейшие представители разных боксёрских школ, бойцы из России, стран СНГ и дальнего зарубежья. Вечер подарил…
Недавно во время инспекции строительства 75 таунхаусов в Висаитовском районе Грозного я пообщался с местными жителями. Как выяснилось позже, среди тех, кто очень хотел тогда со мной встретиться, был и юный блогер Юнус Азиев. Но в общей суматохе мальчик потерял тюбетейку и так и не смог пробраться ко мне.
Этой историей Юнус поделился со своими подписчиками, которых у нашего юного героя уже больше пяти тысяч. Об этом …
Харьковское направление. Бойцы батальона «Ваха» легендарного спецназа «АХМАТ» МО РФ @AptiAlaudinovAKHMAT совместно с военнослужащими 245-го мотострелкового полка МО РФ продолжают методично находить и уничтожать укрытия противника.
⠀
Работа проходит по уже известному сценарию: выявление вражеских позиций, передача координат и нанесение точечных ударов. Как показывает практика, спрятаться от наблюдения с воздуха станов…
Сегодня день рождения отмечает дорогой БРАТ, министр внутренних дел по ЧР Аслан Ирасханов.
Аслана Салмановича по праву можно назвать ветераном команды, основанной Первым Президентом ЧР, Героем России Ахматом-Хаджи Кадыровым, и одним из самых ярких её представителей. За его плечами большой служебный путь, годы ответственной работы и огромный опыт, которые позволяют ему успешно решать самые сложные задачи. За годы сл…
Друзья! Региональный общественный фонд имени Героя России Ахмата-Хаджи Кадырова продолжает широкомасштабную гуманитарную миссию в осаждённом секторе Газа. Помощь вновь дошла до тех, кто оказался в эпицентре одной из самых тяжёлых гуманитарных катастроф нашего времени.
⠀
В рамках очередного этапа акции продукты питания получили 285 семей, среди них — 80 семей в лагере Аль-Абир, где сотни людей нашли лишь временное и х…
В Грозном, на проспекте имени выдающегося чеченского религиозного деятеля, великого Шейха Кунта-Хаджи Кишиева, я проверил ход итоговых работ по строительству крупнейшего исламского центра имени Пророка Мусы (мир ему). Руководит процессом дорогой БРАТ, советник Главы ЧР Амрудди Эдильгириев.
По его словам, объект мы сможем открыть уже в этом месяце. Здесь созданы самые лучшие условия для просветительской и общественно…
Запорожское направление. Расчёт разведывательно-ударного центра (РУЦ) спецназа «АХМАТ» МО РФ @AptiAlaudinovAKHMAT успешно обнаружил и уничтожил вражеский гексакоптер. Беспилотник, видимо, рассчитывал выполнить свою задачу незаметно. Однако планы опять пришлось скорректировать.
⠀
После своевременного обнаружения цель была взята на сопровождение, а затем по ней отработал ударный FPV-дрон. Воздушная «карьера» гексакопте…
Очередная группа добровольцев отправилась из Чеченской Республики в зону проведения специальной военной операции для выполнения поставленных задач. Перед вылетом бойцы собрались на территории Международного аэропорта Грозный имени Героя России Ахмата-Хаджи Кадырова.
Проводил и напутствовал добровольцев дорогой БРАТ, Председатель Правительства Чеченской Республики, начальник Регионального оперативного штаба по провед…
❤905👍711🔥84👏55
Showing the 12 most recent of 6,475 posts we hold for @rkadyrov_95. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@rkadyrov_95 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 380 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 157 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
18
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
17
vacant every time we have ever looked
@rkadyrov_95 named 18 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@izvestia named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 8 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@isa669 named in 9 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@rt_russian named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@lshort named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@rddm_chechnya named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@za_fond_kadyrova named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@rashidtemrezov named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@rtdrussian named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@salah_mezhiev named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@sergeymeniaylo named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@shakhidov_ named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@aavst55 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@zayed_fund named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@artur_beterbiev_box named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@borisdubrovsky named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@chechensailing named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@chechnyanews named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@glavamariupol named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ЛОРД @mdaudov_95 · 1,843,516 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
Адам Делимханов @adelimkhanov_95 · 1,857,220 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
ЧП Грозный 95 @chpgrozny_95 · 96,883 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 August 2026
Апти Алаудинов «АХМАТ» @AptiAlaudinovAKHMAT · 203,980 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
Умар Кремлев @umar_kremlev · 144,714 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026
Д///ИХАД @tvjihad · 123,981 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
Курбан Омаров @zimatut · 101,614 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
Владлен Татарский @vladlentatarsky · 175,608 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
Comedy Club | Камеди клаб @comedyclubru · 103,620 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Правительство России @government_rus · 168,392 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
МИД России 🇷🇺 @MID_Russia · 139,753 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Константин Малофеев @kvmalofeev · 1,328,013 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 August 2026
ДОКТОР МЯСНИКОВ @drmyasnikov · 180,842 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Маргарита Симоньян. Литература и История @msimonyan_literature · 88,527 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
Хижина музыканта @arslan_music · 128,427 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Кремль. Новости @news_kremlin · 283,346 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
По Фактам @pofactam_tg · 123,912 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
Маргарита Симоньян из дома @msimonyan · 138,413 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Мы из СССР | История @sssr_history2 · 269,169 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
NIYSO @niysoo · 189,953 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 August 2026
Объясняем.рф @obyasnayemrf · 287,325 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Уютная Россия | Путешествия @travel_yutturizm · 150,195 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
КОВАЛЕНКО СВЯТ @Kovalenkosvyat · 100,227 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
Чеченские новые песни 2026 🎶🔊 @elizoveta_66 · 83,435 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 208 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
6 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
13 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
2023 Quran burnings in Sweden(en.wikipedia.org) “…|last=Kadyrov |first=Ramzan |date=17 August 2023 |title=Kadyrov_95 |url=https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/3823 |access-date=2024-04-20 |website=Telegram}}
<!--…” read 16 August 2026
Adam Delimkhanov(en.wikipedia.org) “…Putin.{{cite web |title=Ramzan Kadyrov Telegram channel |url=https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/1985}} He was awarded the title the same day.{{Cite…” read 16 August 2026
Komyshuvakha, Sievierodonetsk Raion, Luhansk Oblast(en.wikipedia.org) “…[[Russian invasion of Ukraine]]."{{Cite web |title=Kadyrov_95 |url=https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/2317 |access-date=2022-06-14 |website=Telegram}}{{better…” read 16 August 2026
Делимханов, Адам Султанович(ru.wikipedia.org) “…Луганской Народной Республики|Герой ЛНР]] (2022){{Cite web|url=https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/2893|title=Kadyrov_95|website=Telegram|access-date=2022-09-2…” read 16 August 2026
Дело Ивана Голунова(ru.wikipedia.org) “…ru/russia/664530|archivedate=2019-07-02|url-status=live}}{{cite web|url=https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/615|title=Телеграм-канал Рамзана Кадырова|author=|website=|d…” read 16 August 2026
Лапин, Александр Павлович(ru.wikipedia.org) “…российских войск из [[Лиман (город, Украина)|Лимана]]{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/2911|title=Kadyrov_95|website=Telegram|access-date=2022-10-0…” read 16 August 2026
Муслим Чеберлоевский(ru.wikipedia.org) “…воюющих на стороне Украины{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/1983|title=Kadyrov_95|website=Telegram|access-date=2022-11-0…” read 16 August 2026
Специальный отряд быстрого реагирования «Ахмат»(ru.wikipedia.org) “…Саидмагомедович — действующий командир (01.10.2023){{Cite web|url=https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/3933|title=Kadyrov_95|website=Telegram|access-date=2024-12-1…” read 16 August 2026
Теракт в Кизляре (2018)(ru.wikipedia.org) “…Вестник Кавказа..[https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/148 Телеграм-канал Р. Кадырова] {{Wayback|url=https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/148 |date=20211114170313…” read 16 August 2026
Айдер Рустемов(uk.wikipedia.org) “…Рустемов) були покарані...{{Cite web|title=https://t.me|url=https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/3331|website=RKadyrov_95|accessdate=2023-10-11|language=ru}}''…” read 16 August 2026
Делімханов Адам Султанович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…Путина.{{cite web |title=Ramzan Kadyrov Telegram channel |url=https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/1985}}
== Біографія ==
[[Файл:Адам_Делимханов_и_Ахмед_Догаев…” read 16 August 2026
Кадиров Адам Рамзанович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…приїхав і вручив нагороду[https://t.me/RKadyrov_95/4038 Telegram: Contact @RKadyrov_95][https://t.me/adelimkhanov_95/2444 Telegram: Contact…” read 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kadyrov_95” (@rkadyrov_95), 2,164,830 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rkadyrov_95.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
