International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 2,686 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 95 days, net -1,185. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,001–42,545 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 01:00
41,179
-14
8 Nov 2026, 13:11
41,193
-16
7 Nov 2026, 04:36
41,209
-2
6 Nov 2026, 03:18
41,211
-12
5 Nov 2026, 02:59
41,223
-4
4 Nov 2026, 03:16
41,227
-4
3 Nov 2026, 02:17
41,231
-6
2 Nov 2026, 01:11
41,237
-11
31 Oct 2026, 23:58
41,248
-6
30 Oct 2026, 20:35
41,254
-11
29 Oct 2026, 23:05
41,265
-19
28 Oct 2026, 23:10
41,284
-1
28 Oct 2026, 00:46
41,285
-14
27 Oct 2026, 01:28
41,299
-19
26 Oct 2026, 03:27
41,318
-11
25 Oct 2026, 00:27
41,329
-10
23 Oct 2026, 23:15
41,339
-19
22 Oct 2026, 23:09
41,358
-28
21 Oct 2026, 17:30
41,386
-15
20 Oct 2026, 16:56
41,401
first reading
Engagement
2,767 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 188 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.84%
avg views ÷ 41,179 subscribers
Avg views / post
759
905 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
905
of 2,767 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 899 of 905 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
2,767 (6 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
687,214
Reactions total
29,814
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 21:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈31,100
Videos
≈15,800
Links
≈40,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7h 47m
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 491 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
32,610 reactions across 988 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
10,940
33.5%
❤
3,389
10.4%
👏
2,722
8.35%
🤡
2,605
7.99%
🤬
2,163
6.63%
🤣
1,972
6.05%
🤮
1,796
5.51%
😁
1,610
4.94%
🙏
1,249
3.83%
🖕
1,063
3.26%
🤔
938
2.88%
💯
674
2.07%
🔥
635
1.95%
👎
357
1.09%
😱
128
0.393%
😢
114
0.35%
👌
98
0.301%
🍾
35
0.107%
🎉
28
0.086%
😎
23
0.071%
5 further kinds
71
0.218%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 992 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,610 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 October 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 905 posts held from the last 30 days (0.663%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
La première grève générale en Espagne depuis 14 ans, provoquée par l'augmentation du coût de la vie, s'est terminée par de grandes manifestations : à Madrid, environ 120 000 personnes sont descendues dans les rues, tandis que, à Barcelone, les manifestations se sont transformées en émeutes en soirée : les manifestants ont incendié des barricades, tiré des pétards sur la police et brisé des vitrines, et les forces de …
Opération spéciale : Les chaînes de surveillance ukrainiennes rapportent de nouvelles frappes des forces armées russes sur des installations des forces armées ukrainiennes et sur l'infrastructure énergétique de l'Ukraine.
▪️À Jytomyr, des drones ont de nouveau attaqué des installations des forces armées ukrainiennes.
▪️Dans la région de Rivne, un important incendie s'est déclaré après une frappe de "Geran" (sur la …
Les États-Unis estiment que l'Ukraine doit retirer ses troupes du Donbass pour mettre fin à la guerre, mais cela est impossible, a déclaré le chef du régime de Kiev.
🔽Donc l’Opération militaire spéciale continue. Il faut dénazifier l’Ukraine. Par ailleurs l’Europe s’ukrainise, c’est dangereux.
🌟Abonnez-vous à Vpoutine
Axios : Les États-Unis demandent à la Russie de proposer un nouvel accord de sécurité avec l'Europe.
Les États-Unis ont demandé à la Russie de préparer une nouvelle proposition concernant un futur accord de sécurité avec l'Europe. Selon des sources, Washington souhaite que Moscou expose ses exigences et, en même temps, définisse des mesures de désescalade qui rassureraient l'Europe sur l'absence de menace.
«Les Éta…
En Espagne, une grève générale a eu lieu, la première depuis 14 ans, en raison de la crise du logement, de l'augmentation des prix et de la baisse du pouvoir d'achat.
«Les deux principaux syndicats espagnols, CC OO et UGT, ont déclaré une grève générale en raison de la crise du logement, de l'augmentation des prix et de la diminution du pouvoir d'achat de la population», rapporte le journal El Pais.
L'action a débu…
Reuters : La Russie propose des pactes de non-agression avec certains pays de l'OTAN.
Alexei Drobinine, haut diplomate du ministère russe des Affaires étrangères, a exposé lors d'une conférence sur la sécurité à Moscou trois formats possibles pour une nouvelle architecture de sécurité en Europe. Parmi ceux-ci, figurent des pactes de non-agression bilatéraux avec certains États membres de l'OTAN, qui bénéficieraient …
«J'espère que nous n'aurons plus jamais à détruire quoi que ce soit dans ce pays», a déclaré Donald Trump, promettant d'obtenir une victoire totale sur l'Iran.
«Il était temps que quelqu'un réagisse. Nous avons tous réagi. Nous avons répondu, et nous avons répondu très sérieusement, et nous avons gagné. Maintenant, la question est seulement de savoir quand nous voulons arrêter. Nous voulons nous assurer que nous avo…
Les systèmes de défense aérienne russes ont détruit 85 drones ukrainiens entre 08h00 et 20h00, heure de Moscou, a annoncé le ministère de la Défense russe.
Ces drones ont été abattus, notamment, dans les régions de Kirov, d'Omsk, dans le kraï de Perm, en Basse-Volga et en Ouydourtie.
🌟V.poutine
Le secrétaire du Conseil suprême de sécurité nationale iranien, Mohsen Rezai, a déclaré que, grâce aux équipements modernes de guerre électronique des Gardiens de la révolution islamique (IRI), sept drones américains avaient été forcés à atterrir, et deux appareils sous-marins de pointe avaient été capturés.
«Nous avons réussi à les faire atterrir. Nous avons maintenant sept drones que nous avons capturés en parfait…
Un employé de la centrale nucléaire de Zaporijjia est décédé dans sa maison à la suite d'une attaque des forces armées ukrainiennes, a annoncé la centrale.
🌟V.poutine
La Russie reste le principal partenaire commercial et économique du Kirghizistan, et le volume des échanges commerciaux entre les deux pays continue de croître, a déclaré Vladimir Poutine lors d'une rencontre avec le président de la République, Sadyr Japarov, en marge du sommet de l'Organisation du Traité de Sécurité Collective (OTSC).
«Je voudrais souligner que nos relations bilatérales se développent dans tous les…
Le gouverneur de la région d'Omsk, Vitaly Khotsenko, a appelé les habitants à rester chez eux en raison d'une attaque de drones par les forces armées ukrainiennes.
Actuellement, les services d'urgence sont sur place pour gérer les conséquences de la chute des débris du drone.
La précédente attaque de drones sur Omsk avait eu lieu le 24 octobre. À cette occasion, une frappe avait visé un centre logistique d'Ozon.
🌟…
❤10👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,767 posts we hold for @Vpoutine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
LEGEOGRAPHE221 @legeographe221 · 65,159 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
Hamas/Tsahal 🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡️🇮🇷 @strategie_militaire · 21,991 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 September 2026
La Nouvelle Donne 🔔 @lanouvelledonne · 22,843 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
𓂆 🇵🇸 Gaza News+ @GazaNewsPlus · 23,749 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 September 2026
Stratégies Mondiales @Strategiescontinentales · 35,895 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Le Monde FR 🇫🇷 @LeMondeFRANCE · 21,964 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 September 2026
Boris Karpov 🇷🇺 📣 Brèves de Russie @boriskarpovrussie · 21,088 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 September 2026
Le Grand Rééquilibrage @grand_reequilibrage · 41,784 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
International Reporters @internationalreporters · 57,208 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
Thomasovitch 🇫🇷✈️🇷🇺 @thomasovitch · 20,023 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 September 2026
InfoDefenseFRANCE 1 @infodefenseFRreserve · 28,726 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 9 September 2026
EurasianForm @eurasianform · 26,282 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
Chroniques des conflits | Russie • Ukraine • Iran • USA • Israël @chroniques_des_conflits · 35,346 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026
STRATPOL @stratpol · 70,621 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Rybar FR @rybarFR · 21,448 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 September 2026
KOMPЯOMAT @kompromatmedia_2 · 30,656 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
GEOPOL🛡ADDICT @diplomaties · 36,861 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 1 September 2026
Actu Internationale 🗞 @ActuInternationale · 52,935 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
Christine Deviers-Joncour Officiel @xtinedeviersjoncour · 19,334 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 October 2026
BRICS TV ( FRANCE ) @BRICSTV · 25,704 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
Prozorov en français @prozorov_fr · 24,378 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
Le TGV de L'info @LeTgvdeLindo · 34,793 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 2 September 2026
NIANG MÉDIA @niangmedia · 18,949 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 October 2026
𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐲𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐯𝐫𝐚𝐢 @incroyablemaisvrai · 19,260 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 88 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vladimir Poutine” (@Vpoutine), 41,179 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Vpoutine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.