«C'est l'Europe qui se prépare à une guerre contre nous – ils le confirment chaque jour en affirmant qu'ils doivent être prêts», a déclaré Lavrov. 🌟Abonnez-vous à Vpoutine
💯44🤬27🙏5🔥4❤2

Channel
@Vpoutine
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
41,723subscribers
-641 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001264540906 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Vpoutine |
| Description | Agrégateur socio-politique : citations, analyses, opinions. - POUTINE sur telegram Plus d'informations : @fedorov1979 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Vpoutine |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 41,723 | -62 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 41,785 | -13 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 41,798 | -31 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 41,829 | -25 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 41,854 | -18 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 41,872 | -27 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 41,899 | -75 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 41,974 | -34 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 42,008 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:43 | 42,019 | -25 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 42,044 | -19 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 42,063 | -24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 42,087 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 42,095 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 42,105 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 42,122 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 42,136 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 42,144 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 42,157 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 42,168 | first reading |
1,308 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 715 of 722 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,308 (6 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 588,501 |
| Reactions total | 28,361 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 03:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 441 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
40,423 reactions across 992 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12,986 | 32.1% | |
| ❤ | 3,980 | 9.85% | |
| 🤡 | 3,477 | 8.60% | |
| 🤣 | 3,321 | 8.22% | |
| 🤬 | 2,704 | 6.69% | |
| 👏 | 2,451 | 6.06% | |
| 🤮 | 1,926 | 4.76% | |
| 😁 | 1,816 | 4.49% | |
| 🙏 | 1,791 | 4.43% | |
| 🤔 | 1,762 | 4.36% | |
| 🖕 | 1,477 | 3.65% | |
| 💯 | 1,002 | 2.48% | |
| 🔥 | 623 | 1.54% | |
| 👎 | 448 | 1.11% | |
| 🎉 | 140 | 0.346% | |
| 😱 | 123 | 0.304% | |
| 🥰 | 113 | 0.28% | |
| 🍾 | 96 | 0.237% | |
| 🫡 | 57 | 0.141% | |
| 😎 | 45 | 0.111% | |
| 5 further kinds | 85 | 0.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 992 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40,423 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Vpoutine. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«C'est l'Europe qui se prépare à une guerre contre nous – ils le confirment chaque jour en affirmant qu'ils doivent être prêts», a déclaré Lavrov. 🌟Abonnez-vous à Vpoutine
💯44🤬27🙏5🔥4❤2
⚡️Les Européens se préparent à une guerre contre la Russie, - Lavrov. "Une telle position pourrait s'avérer être une prophétie auto-réalisatrice", a ajouté Lavrov. 🌟Abonnez-vous à Vpoutine
👍43💯21🙏5❤4
Il est déjà ennuyeux d'en parler : Lavrov a déclaré qu'il était déjà las de parler des préoccupations de l'Europe concernant le conflit avec la Russie. « Nous n'avons aucune intention de nous battre avec l'Europe, c'est une absurdité. » 🌟Abonnez-vous à Vpoutine
👍52👏15🥰7
Les pays de l'UE sont appelés à économiser le gaz et l'électricité, rapporte Reuters. Le commissaire européen à l'énergie, Dan Jørgensen, a envoyé une lettre aux ministres de l'énergie des pays de l'Union européenne, dans laquelle il a mis en garde contre la crise imminente et a appelé les gouvernements à envisager des mesures pour limiter la demande de gaz et d'électricité. Le principal problème est l'état des rés…
🤡32🤣9❤3
Moscou ne consentira à la livraison de systèmes S-400 qu'à un pays ami, en qui elle a une confiance totale, car les Européens "voyagent partout dans le monde" à la recherche d'armes pour Kiev, a déclaré Sergueï Lavrov. "Nous étudions toute proposition. Je ne commenterai pas pour l'instant, mais il existe des possibilités – uniquement avec notre accord – où le pays vers lequel ces systèmes S-400 pourraient être dirig…
👍46❤10👏1
« Il a sorti un papier et a lu un texte qui reprenait intégralement ce que l'Allemagne, par la voix de ses dirigeants, déclare officiellement et publiquement chaque jour. Je n'y ai rien appris de nouveau. » Sergueï Lavrov a évoqué sa rencontre avec le ministre allemand des Affaires étrangères, Wadephul, en marge de l'Assemblée générale des Nations Unies. « Quant au ministre Wadephul, il a sollicité une rencontre à l…
👍49❤12🙏1
L'Europe cherche désespérément à s'insérer dans le processus de négociations sur l'Ukraine, encouragé par les États-Unis, et tente de saboter les efforts de résolution pacifique, a déclaré Lavrov. "Nous avons plusieurs canaux de communication avec un certain nombre de pays de l'Union européenne et de l'OTAN. Par des canaux bilatéraux, il existe, si vous voulez, des possibilités confidentielles d'échanger des opinion…
👍32❤9🙏2
Tous les cycles de négociations sur l'Ukraine ont été interrompus non pas par la Russie, mais par ceux qui affirment aujourd'hui que les Russes "évitent les contacts, qu'ils n'ont rien à dire", a déclaré Sergueï Lavrov. "Y a-t-il un manque de confiance de notre côté ? Non, absolument pas. De plus, nous avons repris les négociations bilatérales à Istanbul, et il y a eu des discussions trilatérales avec la participati…
👍37❤8👏3
Au cours de la journée, les forces de défense aérienne ont intercepté et détruit 105 drones ukrainiens de type aérien au-dessus du territoire russe, a annoncé le ministère de la Défense de la Fédération de Russie. Les drones ennemis ont été abattus : ▪️dans la région de Belgorod ; ▪️dans la région de Bryansk ; ▪️dans la région de Koursk ; ▪️dans la région d'Orel ; ▪️dans la région de Krasnodar ; ▪️en Crimée ; ▪️au-…
👍39🙏2
«Les objectifs de l'opération militaire spéciale seront atteints, les menaces à la sécurité de la Russie seront éliminées, et la vie pacifique sera rétablie», a déclaré Sergueï Lavrov. «Les dirigeants de nombreux pays de l'Union européenne, selon les déclarations de leurs représentants, semblent manifestement frappés par le virus de la supériorité raciale, nourrissent des idées russophobes extrémistes, et font preuv…
👍36👏12❤4🤡1
Toutes les phases de négociations concernant l'Ukraine n'ont pas été interrompues par la Russie, mais par ceux qui affirment aujourd'hui que les Russes "évitent les contacts, et qu'ils n'ont rien à dire", a déclaré Sergueï Lavrov lors d'une conférence de presse au siège de l'ONU. «Nous avons repris les négociations bilatérales à Istanbul, et les négociations à trois parties se sont déroulées à Abu Dhabi avec la part…
👍34👏8❤5🤡1
Trump espère résoudre le conflit ukrainien avant l'arrivée de l'"hiver rigoureux". — Allez-vous coordonner avec Zelensky les actions concernant les missiles Patriot ? — J'ai discuté avec Zelensky... Nous avons abordé de nombreuses questions différentes, et sur beaucoup d'entre elles, nous avons des accords très fermes. Mais savez-vous ce que je veux de lui ? Que signe un accord. Je veux qu'il négocie avec Poutine, …
🤔15🤡14🖕9👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,308 posts we hold for @Vpoutine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 80 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vladimir Poutine” (@Vpoutine), 41,723 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Vpoutine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.