Не важно кто мы такие.
Важно то, какой у нас план.
Передать информацию: @dontstopwarofferbot_bot
Разбан: @answerdsw_bot
Частный канал: @DSWsantino_bot
Сотрудничество/реклама: @dswads
Created
1 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net -3,043. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 241,571–257,225 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 14:41
250,248
-814
9 Nov 2026, 02:56
251,062
-743
7 Nov 2026, 22:50
251,805
-428
6 Nov 2026, 22:46
252,233
-371
6 Nov 2026, 00:37
252,604
-318
5 Nov 2026, 02:08
252,922
-354
4 Nov 2026, 02:59
253,276
-617
3 Nov 2026, 04:21
253,893
-660
2 Nov 2026, 03:50
254,553
-485
1 Nov 2026, 02:39
255,038
+5,040
31 Oct 2026, 02:08
249,998
+6,621
30 Oct 2026, 00:50
243,377
-6,027
28 Oct 2026, 21:19
249,404
-1,882
27 Oct 2026, 22:59
251,286
-424
26 Oct 2026, 23:08
251,710
-474
25 Oct 2026, 23:56
252,184
-362
24 Oct 2026, 23:45
252,546
-1,209
23 Oct 2026, 23:46
253,755
-530
22 Oct 2026, 22:08
254,285
-666
21 Oct 2026, 16:48
254,951
first reading
Engagement
1,189 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 241 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 250,248 subscribers
Avg views / post
48,900
320 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
320
of 1,189 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
1,189 (4 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
15,643,016
Reactions total
268,240
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 17:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,790
Videos
≈5,400
Links
≈3,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 04m
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 260 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
799,073 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
276,076
34.5%
😁
117,296
14.7%
🤡
96,643
12.1%
👍
61,000
7.63%
🤣
56,095
7.02%
❤
49,360
6.18%
🤬
46,789
5.86%
🙏
42,936
5.37%
💯
34,381
4.30%
😱
3,633
0.455%
🤔
3,623
0.453%
🎉
3,359
0.42%
😢
2,636
0.33%
👎
2,511
0.314%
🫡
711
0.089%
😡
484
0.061%
👌
431
0.054%
🕊
290
0.036%
🤝
281
0.035%
😎
224
0.028%
3 further kinds
314
0.039%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 799,073 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
167
across the posts below
Posts paid on
102
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
30
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dontstopwar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.3%
3 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
43,200
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
42,400
over 997 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzquyBGYu
1
12 October 2026
12 October 2026
2VtzqvcEjjZ
1
27 August 2026
27 August 2026
2VtzqwGxQBW
1
10 September 2026
10 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 20 of 320 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Ребят,за 5 лет мы прочитали не мало постов о помощи,где пишут наши бойцы,просят объясняют в чём есть необходимость и для каких задач или просят волонтёры для них
А вот теперь глаза закройте и представьте..ты едешь по дороги,а на тебя охотится вражеский дрон,не увернёшься -убъет,не сможешь вовремя выпрыгнуть-убъет.
И можно много привести таких примеров,где за считанные минуты можно потерять жизнь,потому что война!Дава…
Счёт карты MIR-3979 19:55 Перевод 3000р от Альберт С.«Пробьемся , обязательно пробьмся . »
Пришло 15к
Сбербанк - 2202209202553979 Анастасия П.
СБП +79498296445
( Сбербанк)
Зеленский о переговорах в Абу-Даби:
«Я только что общался с нашей командой в Абу-Даби. С россиянами сложно. Они, мягко говоря, не лучшие наши друзья».
А мы в друзья вам никогда и не набивались
Господа и дамы, сборы совсем встали, конечно.
Это очень огорчает нас и парней
Но нам надо продолжать
Сбербанк - 2202209202553979 Анастасия П.
СБП +79498296445
( Сбербанк)
В Абу-Даби завершился первый день трёхсторонних переговоров — они продлились почти пять часов. Главное:
— Стороны начали встречу около 11:15 МСК. Делегации России и Украины использовали для общения русский язык, сообщали источник СМИ;
— Переговоры продлились 4,5 часа с перерывом на 40 минут. Сообщается, что завтра переговоры продолжатся;
— Российскую делегацию возглавляет помощник президента Владимир Мединский, ук…
Герасимов отдал приказ разрушить все мосты через Днепр — командование ВСУ
ВСУ сообщает, что если этой зимой не будет договоренностей о прекращении огня, то Россия сделает непригодными для жизни такие города, как Киев, Харьков, Одесса
Украина может получить только те гарантии безопасности, на которые согласится Россия, — госсекретарь США Марко Рубио
Зеленский готов встретиться с Путиным хоть в Антарктиде, где угодно, только не в Москве.
И не по телефону 😁
Всё, что осталось от базы украинских операторов БПЛА в Камышевахе Запорожской области. Ранее украинский блогер заявлял, что бункер непроницаемый.
🔥1,390👍59🤡8❤5🫡4😢3🤬1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,189 posts we hold for @dontstopwar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@dontstopwar edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 80 posts on @dontstopwar as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
31
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка" @yurasumy · 2,662,248#1
Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны @rvvoenkor · 1,452,307#2
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Охотники за головами @heads_hunters · 30,006 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
Джокер ДНР @JokerDPR · 179,131 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
‼️ ВРАЧИ, ВЫ НЕ ОДНИ‼️ @vrachivyneodni_channel · 30,479 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 7 September 2026
Шепот Фронта @Tatarinov_Rus · 106,619 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
Военные Сводки (СВО) @svorezevv · 54,813 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
XUA-фото войны @XU_kraine · 121,885 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
КАСПЕР 🇧🇾 @kasper_mus · 69,722 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
Херсонский Вестник @HersonVestnik · 47,217 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
На марше™ | Источник @namarshe · 56,380 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Синяя Z Борода @beard_tim · 107,842 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
ВДВ Псков ZOV @vdvpskovz · 25,101 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 September 2026
RUSVARG @rusvarg · 38,270 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
Герань Цветущая ™ @geran231 · 78,273 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
Тринадцатый. @Z13_Separ · 208,541 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
PITBULL & EspañolA @OlympicPitbull · 34,983 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
АРХАНГЕЛ СПЕЦНАЗА @arx_spn · 1,018,125 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
РУССКИЙ ПАТРИОТ @russianpatriotvzo · 42,628 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
CREW RUSSIA @crewruss1a · 60,711 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
Сводки и Аналитика СВО (Резерв) @rezervsvo · 203,626 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка" @yurasumy · 2,662,248 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 August 2026
ДОЛГОВ @superdolgov · 33,318 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
ZАПИСКИ VЕТЕРАНА 🇷🇺 @notes_veterans · 273,805 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Артёмовск @rus_bakhmut · 28,065 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
Ищи хохлов 21+ @xoxol_uk · 85,056 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 207 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇷🇺 DONTSTOPWAR” (@dontstopwar), 250,248 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dontstopwar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.