Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Weeb Union

@weebunionwar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,301subscribers

-56 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001655345299
TypeChannel
Username@weebunionwar
DescriptionMy map: https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1sFRJhfNV-R1kSTXcej2MeHBzcCL8X0o&ll=48.213595591597695%2C37.71532695530878&z=11
Created20 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/weebunionwar

Growth

17,30117,35717,3297 August 2026 — 17,357 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,349 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,330 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,325 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,320 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,314 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,301 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,293–17,365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:5617,301-13
12 Aug 2026, 02:3217,314-6
11 Aug 2026, 00:0417,320-5
9 Aug 2026, 21:5117,325-5
8 Aug 2026, 23:5917,330-19
8 Aug 2026, 03:3417,349-8
7 Aug 2026, 09:3017,357first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.9%
avg views ÷ 17,301 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,290
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (1 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total33,170
Reactions total973
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
16,500
Videos
5,190
Links
13,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 39s
Average length
3m 25s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,297 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
82936.1%
👍81235.4%
🤯1747.58%
🔥1245.40%
🤬733.18%
💯652.83%
🤣632.74%
👏361.57%
😁321.39%
🏆180.784%
👎160.697%
🤔160.697%
🫡150.653%
🙏110.479%
🤨70.305%
30.131%
🎉20.087%
😢10.044%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,297reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @weebunionwar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈4,440 views218 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

I will update the southern front in a video this weekend, after that I will go through the front in a power push to try and get up to date but there have been a lot of changes this summer so it'll take some time...

👍15735🏆10🤣5👏4👎3🫡2🙏2

Signed Weeb Union

7 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC≈4,470 views178 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @motopatriot78Photo

Запорожская область. Бойцы 42-й мотострелковой дивизии прорвали оборону противника в районе Орехово. Закрепились в самом городе, а также в Преображенке. Вот вам хохлы и "Малая Токмачка".

🔥94🤯47👍199👏3🙏3🤔2👎1

Signed Weeb Union

30 Jul 2026, 19:41 UTC≈9,460 views342 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026

I started working on the next video so expect it within the coming week

208👍103👏14🔥10🤣6😁1

Signed Weeb Union

19 Jul 2026, 23:33 UTC≈14,800 views235 reactionsread 13 August 2026

France vs England was more entertaining but congratulations to Spain for a dominating performance leaving Argentina with almost 0 chances in 2 hours. 🇪🇸🎉

159💯41👍25🤣4🏆3👎3

Signed Weeb Union

8 Jul 2026, 21:08 UTC≈21,300 views133 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

It seems the war has restarted, the US couldn't take the result I guess...

👍88🤯21💯13🤨7😁2🔥1😢1

Signed Weeb Union

8 Jul 2026, 21:07 UTC≈18,800 views86 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @middle_east_spectatorVideo

—❗️🇺🇸/🇮🇷 Footage shows the destroyed control towers at Chabahar Port (Shahid Beheshti Pier) @Middle_East_Spectator

🤬7310🔥3

Signed Weeb Union

7 Jul 2026, 20:07 UTC≈14,100 views70 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

Btw not saying either team was bad it was a great match 👏

50👍13🏆3😁3💯1

Signed Weeb Union

7 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC≈14,100 views148 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

This world cup match was so painful to watch, 12 players on the Argentinian team I wonder how much they bet on the team when it was 20x in their favor...

👍90😁22🤣13💯10👎92🎉2

Signed Weeb Union

6 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC≈15,500 views210 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Map is now fully up to date, new video tomorrow!

132👍60👏15😁3

Signed Weeb Union

5 Jul 2026, 22:35 UTC≈9,010 views86 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @Suriyak_mapsPhoto

Ukrainian-Russian war. Day 1585-1591: 🇺🇦🇷🇺 Situation north of Donetsk & Lyman fronts: During the last week, the situation in Stavky has remained difficult for the Russians due to the extension of the incursions by Ukrainian forces into the locality’s rear. Russian forces are attempting to relieve the pressure through new operations in the gray zones of Ukrainian infiltration to the east and west of Stavky, where they

👍50🤣149🫡6🔥3🤔2🙏2

Signed Weeb Union

5 Jul 2026, 22:35 UTC≈6,590 views79 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @Suriyak_mapsPhoto

Ukrainian-Russian war. Day 1585-1591: 🇺🇦🇷🇺 Situation on Kupiansk front: During the last week, Russian Army has cleared the forest and the northern part of Kupyansk-Vuzlovyi after a month and a half of fighting, pushing the front line toward the silicate plant. Meanwhile, Russian forces continue to advance in Novoosynove and south of Hlushkivka. Map: [ https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1V8NzjQkzMOhpuLhkktbiKgod

👍54🔥11🤣6🫡53

Signed Weeb Union

4 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC≈8,220 views64 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

Next front?

  1. Hulyaipole17%
  2. Pokrovsk13%
  3. Lyman38%
  4. Kupyansk35%
  5. Sumy22%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

41👍12🤣83

Signed Weeb Union

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @weebunionwar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTCAnonymous Poll1,490 voters approx.

Next front?

  1. Hulyaipole17%
  2. Pokrovsk13%
  3. Lyman38%
  4. Kupyansk35%
  5. Sumy22%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 539,983 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Intel Slava
@intelslava · 395,638
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Weeb Union” (@weebunionwar), 17,301 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weebunionwar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.