9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,589–35,623 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 08:47
35,593
-3
12 Aug 2026, 08:47
35,596
-16
11 Aug 2026, 11:42
35,612
-3
10 Aug 2026, 08:15
35,615
-1
9 Aug 2026, 10:31
35,616
+10
8 Aug 2026, 11:05
35,606
-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:52
35,607
-10
6 Aug 2026, 10:20
35,617
-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:48
35,619
first reading
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
40.2%
avg views ÷ 35,593 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,300
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
46 (4 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
658,720
Reactions total
8,872
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
370
Videos
229
Links
31
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
10m 46s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,872 reactions across 46 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
2,315
26.1%
🔥
1,103
12.4%
👍
1,102
12.4%
🙏
866
9.76%
🤷♂
780
8.79%
❤
563
6.35%
😢
471
5.31%
🤔
301
3.39%
💯
289
3.26%
😁
179
2.02%
🫡
164
1.85%
👀
159
1.79%
🕊
103
1.16%
😭
99
1.12%
🗿
59
0.665%
😱
53
0.597%
😈
51
0.575%
👌
47
0.53%
👎
35
0.394%
😡
31
0.349%
9 further kinds
102
1.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,872reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 46 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @petrenko_iHS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ночью украинские ракеты FP-5 «Фламинго» поразили ракетно-космический центр «Прогресс» в Самаре. Удар по предприятию подтвердили российские власти, сообщив о ракетной атаке на промышленный объект. На прилегающей территории находится авиазавод «Авиакор». После удара там также зафиксировали пожар.
РКЦ «Прогресс» — одно из крупнейших предприятий российской ракетно-космической отрасли. В частности, предприятие производит…
На Харьковском приграничье российские войска продвинулись в районе Кудиевки, где уже сняли видео с флагами. Ранее противник занял узловую станцию первичной телефонной сети, после чего начал штурмовать в восточном направлении.
Российские ресурсы решили опровергнуть заявления Генштаба ВСУ и украинских военных об успешном контрнаступлении и выкатили видео с российскими флагами из 17 населённых пунктов.
Вот только ролик начинается с прошлогодних кадров демонстрации флага в Александрограде. Отличное начало для «доказательства».
Дальше я решил особо не углубляться, особенно после июльского эпизода восточнее Белого Колодезя. Тогда российские р…
В западной части Купянска ВСУ продолжают фиксировать отдельные группы российских войск. При этом их задача заключается не столько в попытке закрепиться в городе, сколько в рассредоточении украинских операторов БПЛА, что создаёт российским подразделениям дополнительные возможности для продвижения восточнее Оскола — одновременно в сторону восточной части Купянска и Купянска-Узлового. В последнем российские солдаты уже …
Добропольское направление. Противник закрепился на восточной окраине Белицкого и продолжает штурмовать город малыми группами. Одновременно идут бои в направлении трёх шахт, в районах Шевченко и Светлого, а также в направлении Нового Донбасса.
Глава МИД России Лавров заявил, что Россия не согласна на прекращение огня по текущей линии соприкосновения в качестве первого шага к переговорам.
По словам Лаврова, Москва уже отвергала формулу, при которой стороны сначала останавливают боевые действия, а затем договариваются о дальнейшем урегулировании. Фактически это означает, что Россия не рассматривает нынешнюю линию фронта как готовую основу для окончательного…
Украина через третью сторону направила России предложение о взаимном прекращении ударов по гражданским объектам и коммерческим судам в Чёрном море, сообщает Reuters. Инициатива появилась на фоне резкого ухудшения ситуации с судоходством и зерновым экспортом.
Для Украины ставки особенно высоки: около 90% экспорта зерновых культур и другой аграрной продукции идёт через Чёрное море. С начала августа объём украинских зе…
Замглавы МИД РФ Александр Грушко заявил, что Москва пока не получала официально оформленных предложений о возможном моратории на боевые действия в Чёрном море.
На самом деле ситуация несколько иная. Представители России уже располагают несколькими предложениями, однако хотят, чтобы они были официально представлены Стивом Уиткоффом и Джаредом Кушнером лично Путину.
В Москве хотят, чтобы инициатива выглядела не как п…
На Дружковском направлении противник снял кадры с демонстрацией флагов в населённом пункте Петровка и стремится продвинуться к селу Райское, расположенному южнее одноимённого посёлка.
Задумка российского командования выглядит достаточно понятной. Ещё в 2025 году ВСУ остановили продвижение противника у населённого пункта Русин Яр, и существенных изменений на этом участке за год не произошло. Поэтому российские подраз…
Украинские беспилотники атаковали НПЗ в Салавате и логистический центр Wildberries в Чишминском районе Башкортостана. На обоих объектах вспыхнули крупные пожары.
Тем временем Орский НПЗ полностью остановлен после атаки БПЛА. По словам губернатора Оренбургской области Евгения Солнцева, ремонт предприятия может занять до полугода.
В результате удара по Новороссийску украинские силы поразили сразу четыре российских военных корабля: фрегаты «Адмирал Макаров» и «Адмирал Эссен», малый ракетный корабль «Буян-М» и сторожевой корабль «Василий Быков».
Силы обороны Украины в ходе наступательной операции освободили 26 населённых пунктов в Донецкой, Днепропетровской и Запорожской областях.
Украинские флаги установлены в следующих населённых пунктах: Толстой, Новохатское, Грушевское, Зирка, Зелёный Гай, Поддубное, Мирное, Приволье, Цегельное, Злагода, Красногорское, Привольное, Новогригоровка, Степовое, Калиновское, Березовое, Новониколаевка, Воскресенка, Александрог…
❤258🔥76👍47🫡22😈12
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @petrenko_iHS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@petrenko_iHS edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 710,976 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕТРЕНКО ✙” (@petrenko_iHS), 35,593 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petrenko_iHS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
