Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Descifrando la Guerra

Channel

Descifrando la Guerra

@descifrandolaguerra

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,845subscribers

-219 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001636976839
TypeChannel
Username@descifrandolaguerra
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/descifrandolaguerra

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,84521,06420,954.56 August 2026 — 21,064 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,064 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,060 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,052 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,039 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,035 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,030 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,022 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,018 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,012 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,010 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,000 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,993 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,984 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,970 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,961 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,956 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,954 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,948 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,947 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,940 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,933 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,927 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,919 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,911 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,895 subscribers4 September 2026 — 20,892 subscribers6 September 2026 — 20,881 subscribers9 September 2026 — 20,867 subscribers12 September 2026 — 20,864 subscribers13 September 2026 — 20,858 subscribers15 September 2026 — 20,854 subscribers17 September 2026 — 20,845 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -219. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,812–21,097 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 11:0020,845-9
15 Sept 2026, 09:3920,854-4
13 Sept 2026, 20:3720,858-6
12 Sept 2026, 00:4020,864-3
9 Sept 2026, 18:1820,867-14
6 Sept 2026, 07:2020,881-11
4 Sept 2026, 04:1820,892-3
2 Sept 2026, 19:3820,895-16
1 Sept 2026, 15:3820,911-8
31 Aug 2026, 16:0420,919-8
30 Aug 2026, 17:5520,927-6
29 Aug 2026, 16:0520,933-7
28 Aug 2026, 16:4320,940-7
27 Aug 2026, 18:2320,947-1
26 Aug 2026, 19:0220,948-6
25 Aug 2026, 19:3620,954-2
24 Aug 2026, 22:4720,956-5
23 Aug 2026, 11:5920,961-9
21 Aug 2026, 23:3620,970-14
20 Aug 2026, 15:0820,984first reading

Engagement

163 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 20,845 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,500
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.841%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 163 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held163 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total95,061
Reactions total799
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 17:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 37s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,548 reactions across 139 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,05329.7%
❤78422.1%
🤮41011.6%
🤬2767.78%
🔥1774.99%
🤡1694.76%
👎812.28%
💩812.28%
👏732.06%
😁531.49%
🤔491.38%
👀411.16%
🕊320.902%
🤣230.648%
🍌170.479%
💯150.423%
🌭140.395%
👌140.395%
🥰140.395%
👾130.366%
33 further kinds1594.48%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 139 of the 163 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,548 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 163 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 16:13 UTC691 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🇪🇸 “La amenaza híbrida constituye el concepto más amplio de los tres. No hace referencia a una guerra concreta, sino al empleo coordinado de diferentes instrumentos de poder para explotar las vulnerabilidades de un adversario. Su lógica es esencialmente asimétrica. En lugar de buscar la derrota militar del adversario, pretende erosionar progresivamente su capacidad de decisión, su cohesión política, su credibilidad …

💯5

3 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,520 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇪🇸🇲🇦 ¿Por qué España no señala a Marruecos por la crisis de Ceuta? El Gobierno español evita responsabilizar directamente a Marruecos por la entrada masiva en Ceuta y destaca, en cambio, su cooperación posterior en los retornos. La crisis ha expuesto la dependencia española de Rabat para controlar la frontera y ha abierto tensiones internas por la gestión política, la coordinación entre ministerios y las alertas pre…

💩11🤬5😁2❤1👍1

3 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC≈1,750 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Una mirada crítica al Ejército Árabe de Liberación 🌍 Oriente Medio y Norte de África 📌 #Palestina Lejos de la simplificación propagandística de la primera guerra árabe-israelí (1948) como una reedición del mito semita del David israelí derrotando al Goliat árabe, este fue un conflicto complejo movido por distintos intereses políticos y en el que participaron, en mayor o menor medida, múltiples actores. El Ejército …

❤5👍4

3 Sept 2026, 07:48 UTC≈1,760 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🇪🇸🇲🇦 “Las tensiones en torno a Ceuta han puesto de manifiesto que la competición entre Estados ya no se desarrolla exclusivamente mediante el empleo de la fuerza militar. La gestión de los flujos migratorios, la presión diplomática, las campañas informativas o las medidas económicas pueden convertirse en instrumentos capaces de influir sobre las decisiones políticas de otro Estado sin necesidad de cruzar el umbral de…

👍10❤2🤮1

3 Sept 2026, 05:31 UTC≈1,930 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🇰🇵🇷🇺 RUSIA Y COREA DEL NORTE ESTRECHAN SU ALIANZA La guerra de Ucrania ha reforzado considerablemente la relación entre Rusia y Corea del Norte. Pionyang ha proporcionado a Moscú municiones y tropas, aprovechando unas capacidades militares y una disposición para involucrarse directamente en el conflicto difíciles de encontrar entre otros socios rusos. El aislamiento de Corea del Norte respecto a Occidente resulta c…

👍20🤮4❤3

2 Sept 2026, 18:49 UTC≈2,340 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇺🇦🇷🇺 En el frente de Lyman, en el norte de Donetsk, el ejército ucraniano continúa presionando para liberar la presión sobre la ciudad desde el norte, pero el ejército ruso ha vuelto a recuperar algo de terreno al sur. Link a nuestra cobertura: https://www.descifrandolaguerra.es/coberturas/guerra-ruso-ucraniana/

❤12👍11🔥2🕊2

2 Sept 2026, 18:47 UTC≈2,260 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇷🇺🇺🇦 La situación continúa siendo favorable para el ejército ruso en el frente principal de Donetsk. La línea Dobropillya-Oleksijevo-Druzkhivka continúa viendo avances paulatinos, pero lentos. Link a nuestra cobertura: https://www.descifrandolaguerra.es/coberturas/guerra-ruso-ucraniana/

❤14👍10🕊3🤬3

2 Sept 2026, 14:27 UTC≈2,340 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇰🇵 ¿Por qué Corea del Norte tiene armas nucleares? | El Mundo al Detalle 2x11 En este episodio de "El Mundo al Detalle" analizamos por qué Corea del Norte ha situado el poder militar y las armas nucleares en el centro de su estrategia de supervivencia. Repasamos el origen de la doctrina Songun, el impacto de la desaparición de la Unión Soviética y el desarrollo progresivo del programa nuclear norcoreano. Puedes esc…

👍5🔥5❤3💊1

2 Sept 2026, 13:52 UTC≈2,290 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Trump va a por Irán (una vez más...) Estados Unidos ha vuelto a atacar posiciones iraníes en el golfo Pérsico y estudia nuevos golpes limitados contra radares, defensas antiaéreas y misiles antibuque en la costa. La Casa Blanca acusa a Teherán de intentar volver a minar el estrecho de Ormuz, mientras Irán advierte de que una nueva escalada tendrá una respuesta no proporcional. El principal bloqueo sigue siendo …

❤6🔥5👍4🤡1😈1

2 Sept 2026, 09:30 UTC≈2,320 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🚨 ESTAMOS EN DIRECTO 🚨 🇨🇳 CHINA ACELERA SU APUESTA POR EL CORREDOR MARÍTIMO ÁRTICO 🇹🇼 TAIWÁN: MÁS GASTO MILITAR Y PUGNA POLÍTICA INTERNA 🇯🇵 JAPÓN: PRESUPUESTO RÉCORD EN DEFENSA Con Ander Sierra y Esteve Alonso 🔗 twitch.tv/descifrandolaguerra

🔥7👍4🤮3❤2

2 Sept 2026, 06:44 UTC≈2,340 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🇻🇪🇺🇸 “Las dudas legales son especialmente relevantes porque la propia Constitución venezolana prohíbe en su artículo 13 ceder, traspasar o arrendar territorio nacional a Estados extranjeros. Esto no impide necesariamente conceder derechos de explotación sobre yacimientos concretos a empresas extranjeras, pero obliga a distinguir entre el control operativo o comercial de determinados campos y cualquier forma de sober…

❤6👍5🤮5💩2🤣2

Showing the 12 most recent of 163 posts we hold for @descifrandolaguerra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

eldiario.es
@eldiarioes · 44,692
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Ruben Gisbert
@rubengisbertoficial · 73,013
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
ENTRE GUERRAS
@entre_guerras · 136,560
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Ciudadanos de Uniforme
@ciudadanosdeuniforme · 28,705
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
Guía Low Cost
@guialowcost · 38,814
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 31 August 2026
Spanish Revolution
@SpanishRevolution · 31,422
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Descifrando la Guerra” (@descifrandolaguerra), 20,845 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/descifrandolaguerra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.