JD Vance Erupts on 'Scumbag' Journalist Who Targeted One of His Staffers for Being Tucker Carlson's Son https://fightingthecommies.com/APPG
👍376🔥110🥱47🤔31

Channel
@TuckerFans
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
109,481subscribers
-675 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001445249867 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TuckerFans |
| Description | An unofficial fan channel dedicated to Tucker Carlson, the former most-watched and favorite cable news host in America. |
| Created | 10 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TuckerFans |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 109,481 | -99 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 109,580 | -151 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 109,731 | -90 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:11 | 109,821 | -86 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 109,907 | -128 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 110,035 | -121 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:21 | 110,156 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 110,156 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11,815 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3,183 | 26.9% | |
| ❤ | 2,995 | 25.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1,940 | 16.4% | |
| 🤔 | 1,216 | 10.3% | |
| 😁 | 631 | 5.34% | |
| 🙏 | 443 | 3.75% | |
| 💯 | 357 | 3.02% | |
| 👏 | 356 | 3.01% | |
| 👎 | 293 | 2.48% | |
| 🤣 | 99 | 0.838% | |
| 🤮 | 67 | 0.567% | |
| 🥱 | 67 | 0.567% | |
| ✍ | 33 | 0.279% | |
| 🌚 | 25 | 0.212% | |
| 👀 | 25 | 0.212% | |
| 😭 | 23 | 0.195% | |
| 😱 | 23 | 0.195% | |
| 🤬 | 23 | 0.195% | |
| 😈 | 10 | 0.085% | |
| 👻 | 6 | 0.051% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,815reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2025 to 17 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
JD Vance Erupts on 'Scumbag' Journalist Who Targeted One of His Staffers for Being Tucker Carlson's Son https://fightingthecommies.com/APPG
👍376🔥110🥱47🤔31
Shocking Video Surfaces Of Attempted Trump Assassin Thomas Crooks https://fightingthecommies.com/APPC
🔥183🤔57🙏36👍16
CHAOS - Tucker Carlson Nearly Gets Into BRAWL at Charlie Kirk Event https://fightingthecommies.com/AOXA
🤔195🔥82😁19😈10
Video of AOC Gloating After Fox Canceled Tucker Comes Back to Haunt Leftists Shouting About Kimmel Suspension https://fightingthecommies.com/AOAI
❤431😁193👍100🤮67
Flashback: Jimmy Kimmel Couldn't Hide His Glee When Tucker Carlson Was Fired from Fox https://fightingthecommies.com/ANZV
😁356💯225🔥58🥱20
🚨 𝗙𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗧𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗦𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗮 𝗗𝗿𝘂𝗴 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗲𝗹, 𝗔𝗿𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝟲𝟭𝟳 𝗦𝘂𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 Read more 👇 https://theepochtim.es/6cz0pd
❤443👍165👏88🔥43
Watch: Tucker Gives Mark Cuban Literal Spasm with Ukraine Question No Elite Lib Wants to Answer, And the Audience Roars https://fightingthecommies.com/ANSQ
👍334👏108❤94💯35
Charlie Kirk on how continuing to ignore the debt slavery of Gen Z will lead to revolution. — — — Trump Supporters Are Quietly Starting Their ‘Second Retirement.’ You won’t hear about it on the news - but this movement is spreading fast: https://saferead.org/second-retirement
👍302❤95🙏95👻6
Dan Bongino Humiliated After Attorney General Pam Bondi ... https://fightingthecommies.com/AMFR
👍247👎75❤57🔥41
'I'm Not Built For This': George Santos Tells Tucker Carlson He Might Not 'Survive' Prison https://fightingthecommies.com/AMDC
🤔233🤣99❤37😭23
‘I Haven’t Told My Wife’ - Tucker Carlson Shares Chilling News https://fightingthecommies.com/AMAW
👍206❤48😱15👎10
Tucker Carlson Says 'There Are Only 2 Explanations That I Can Think Of' for the Epstein List Debacle https://fightingthecommies.com/AMAJ
🤔313❤91🔥53😱8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TuckerFans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 165,458 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tucker Carlson Fanbase” (@TuckerFans), 109,481 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TuckerFans.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.