Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Привет, Андрей!

@hey_andrey

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,327subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001450486299
TypeChannel
Username@hey_andrey
Created2 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hey_andrey

Growth

2,3252,3312,3286 August 2026 — 2,330 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,331 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,325 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,327 subscribers2,3276 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,324–2,332 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:032,327+2
10 Aug 2026, 03:022,325-6
6 Aug 2026, 20:202,331+1
6 Aug 2026, 14:332,330first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.1%
avg views ÷ 2,327 subscribers
Avg views / post
584
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total4,089
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

234 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9741.5%
🔥5925.2%
😁5824.8%
💯208.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC250 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У меня снова появляется рубрика пиар: готов прорекламировать маленькие и не очень маленькие каналы. Уважаемые авторы, прошу в личку.

7

5 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC324 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ребята, ко мне в личку постучались коллеги из Стратоплана и предложили освоить одну из программ, в обмен на мой честный взгляд на процесс обучения. Доступные программы для обучения: • stratoplan-school.com/team/ – базовая программа по управлению для тимлидов; • stratoplan-school.com/head/ – программа для руководителей отдела; • stratoplan-school.com/cto/ – программа для технических директоров; • stratoplan-school.c

4🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 07:43 UTC612 viewsread 7 August 2026

Господи и дамы, у меня такой вопрос: допустим, я так себе человек, гипотетически хочу воспользоваться служебным положением и приобрести mac mini на организацию. Вопрос: какая моделька на него встанет как влитая? У кого какой опыт, знания и тд?

29 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC662 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Привет, ребята, че как вы? Я подружился с совершенно прекрасными сотрудниками Timeweb.Cloud (они мне подарили кофер, а так как я человек продажный, они теперь мои лучшие друзья). Так вот, эти прекрасные люди устраивают небольшую тусовку в пятницу в 11:00, с падлом (территориально Васильевский остров, клуб Ракета) и едой. Я бы сам пошел, но у меня рабочее совещание. Поэтому есть вариант позвать кого-то из вас, если

5😁3

23 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC756 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ребята, привет, снова ищу дизайнера. Почасовка, ставкой не обидим. У нас есть Х интерфейсов мобильных приложений. Нам периодически нужно их обновлять, делать мелкие задачки. Приложение написано под android, на kotlin multiplatform. В UI используется jetpack compose и material 3, хорошо бы, чтобы кандидат их знал не понаслышке. Из требований: голова на плечах, насмотренность и умение общаться 🙂 Пишите в личку.

🔥3

21 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC795 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хочу поделиться своим наблюдением. Если уж я заметил тенденцию - ее уже поздно отрицать (и надо возглавить): текущие IT роли трансформируются в нечто новое. Особенно это затрагивает менеджеров по продукту, как мне кажется. Мое мнение сформировалось под влиянием следующих пунктов: 1. Сейчас у многих на устах - AI-first. Это новый черный. Например, мусорка, то есть, простите, сфера обращения с отходами. Конкретно у

7🔥2💯1

20 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC690 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Коллеги, я прошу прощения - у нас случился очень печальный форс-мажор и я пока не понимаю, что будет дальше с этой вакансией. Я отпишусь всем написавшим в личку, сориентирую, дайте немного времени.

3

16 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC925 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ребята! Не вижу такого же энтузиазма, как от 1Сников!

😁19

16 Jul 2026, 09:54 UTC875 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Горячие новости с мусорных полей: у меня в компании открыта вакансия Product Manager, с вероятной трансформацией в AI Product Engineer. Мы строим коммерческий продукт по вывозу отходов и работы реально много. Потолок рынка где-то в стратосфере, спрос есть и конкуренты есть, эффект низкой базы присутствует. Нужен хороший discovery и желание им заниматься. У нас компания мощная, возможностей - миллион, но важно не рас

🔥10😁8

15 Jul 2026, 07:45 UTC764 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вообще, я отлистал свой канал на Х месяцев назад: боже мой, я писал серьезные и вдумчивые тексты. Они мне прям нравятся. Очевидно, писал какой-то прекрасный человек. Что же случилось, почему не пишется? Не пишется, вернее, не писалось, вот почему: 1. Очень много активности в обучении ( да и на работе, чего уж там ). Начиная с весны я вкатился в очередные "мягкие ниши": мастермайнды и стратегические сессии. Сначала

🔥156💯2😁1

15 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC568 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Слушайте, а вот этот вайбкодинг - с ним как вообще бороться? Может какая-то антипаразитарная служба есть? Или надо в церковь сходить?

😁7💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hey_andrey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 287,231 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Привет, Андрей!” (@hey_andrey), 2,327 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hey_andrey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.