Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Продуктовый Стэтхем

@productstatham

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,598subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001996485017
TypeChannel
Username@productstatham
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/productstatham

Growth

4,5984,6054,601.57 August 2026 — 4,605 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,604 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,600 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,598 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,597–4,606 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:464,598-2
10 Aug 2026, 19:174,600-4
8 Aug 2026, 04:314,604-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:174,605first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4,585 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁4,585100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,585reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2024 to 9 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Feb 2026, 08:06 UTC≈6,090 views233 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Продакт, помни: недели программирования командой могут сэкономить тебе часы проработки задачи. (с) @productstatham

😁233

Signed Egor Danilov

8 Sept 2025, 07:00 UTC≈11,000 views203 reactionsread 12 August 2026

У нас было 2 PRD, 75 user story, 5 пачек wireframe, пол-беклога багов и целая россыпь продуктовых гипотез всех сортов и расцветок, а также Miro, Figma и ящик Jira-тасков. Не то чтобы это был необходимый запас для спринта. Но если начал собирать требования, становится трудно остановиться. Единственное, что вызывало у меня опасение — это JTBD. Нет ничего более беспомощного, безответственного и испорченного, чем продакт

😁203

Signed Mikhail Tabunov

25 Aug 2025, 09:50 UTC≈10,100 views109 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Индейцы убили целый отдел продактов, сидят жарят их на костре. Один индеец другому говорит: — Слушай, а почему мясо такое мягкое? — Да они всю жизнь только языком работали, вот мышцы и не развились. (c) @productstatham

😁109

Signed Mikhail Tabunov

23 May 2025, 06:59 UTC≈12,300 views188 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Разработчики и продакты как супруги в долгом браке — они уже не слушают друг друга, но делают вид, что всё понимают. (с) @productstatham

😁188

Signed TM Assistance

22 May 2025, 06:59 UTC≈11,400 views164 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хороший продакт — как единорог: все о нём говорят, но никто не видел. (с) @productstatham

😁164

Signed TM Assistance

28 Apr 2025, 07:04 UTC≈17,000 views320 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Никогда не верь трем вещам: - Словам наркомана - Слезам проститутки - Уверениям продакта, что фича детально продумана (с) @productstatham

😁320

Signed Egor Danilov

25 Apr 2025, 07:00 UTC≈13,300 views89 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Утречко, коллеги! Хотя, как говорится, лучше дочь в сауне чем сын чей-то коллега. (c) @devngo

😁89

Signed Mikhail Tabunov

15 Apr 2025, 07:03 UTC≈17,600 views328 reactionsread 12 August 2026

На похоронах продакт-менеджера гроб семь раз возвращали на доработку. (с) @productstatham

😁328

Signed Egor Danilov

31 Mar 2025, 07:04 UTC≈19,800 views387 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Почему продакты идеально решают проблемы? Потому что чтобы решить проблему, ты должен думать как проблема. Жить как проблема. Ты сам должен стать проблемой. (с) @productstatham

😁387

Signed Egor Danilov

3 Mar 2025, 07:04 UTC≈17,600 views267 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Дети продактов начинают ныть и перекладывать ответственность на три года раньше обычных детей (с) @productstatham

😁267

Signed Продакты не нужны

20 Jan 2025, 07:02 UTC≈18,000 views298 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сегодня подрался с продактом и он кинул в меня макбуком. Не ожидал от него такой техники. (c) @productstatham

😁298

Signed Mikhail Tabunov

16 Jan 2025, 07:04 UTC≈17,100 views156 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Разработка Боинга 737 занимает 1.5 млн человеко часов. Если бы его разрабатывали в IT корпорации: - Создание agile манифеста: 15 млн человеко часов. - Согласование подарков на 23 февраля и 8 марта: бесконечность (с) @productstatham

😁156

Signed Mikhail Tabunov

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @productstatham. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 768,919 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Продуктовый Стэтхем” (@productstatham), 4,598 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/productstatham.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.