I am well positioned in some tek plays on robinhood chain and one of my main bets is $GWOOD Been bull posting this since 1.7m and I think that the fun has not started yet on this beast For those who doesnβt know what the tech is yet you can check out the X thread I wrote the other day https://x.com/thecryptochefx/status/2085456639201579327?s=46 Positioned in the neobank of robinhood https://dexscreener.com/robinβ¦

Channel
ππππ πππ π
@zeus_gem
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
53,548subscribers
-3,403 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002031740565 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zeus_gem |
| Description | Zeus β’ & Β© βΌοΈDM ONLY: @zeusdev8 or @callofzeus Twitter: x.com/zeusgem Gambles: @zeusgambles Disclaimer: https://t.me/zeus_gem/12 Not Financial Advice. DYOR |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zeus_gem |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 53,548 | -74 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 53,622 | -823 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 54,445 | -665 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 55,110 | -651 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 55,761 | -856 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 56,617 | -334 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 56,951 | first reading |
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 9.79%
- avg views Γ· 53,548 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,240
- 66 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.682%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 67
- of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 64 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 67 (2 August 2026 β 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 346,072 |
| Reactions total | 2,277 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- β1,980
- Videos
- β205
- Links
- β2,480
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 13 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2,277 reactions across 64 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π― | 381 | 16.7% | |
| π | 320 | 14.1% | |
| π€‘ | 310 | 13.6% | |
| β‘ | 285 | 12.5% | |
| π³ | 276 | 12.1% | |
| π | 113 | 4.96% | |
| β€ | 104 | 4.57% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 93 | 4.08% | |
| π₯ | 84 | 3.69% | |
| π | 81 | 3.56% | |
| π | 79 | 3.47% | |
| π₯° | 79 | 3.47% | |
| π€© | 72 | 3.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 2,277reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
π₯ HMM [5.6x] β callofzeus β 4.92M β 27.57M (4d) 0x7fe995a80075df3dc8ae11a9b82c7fe4202cd87f
β‘15π14π€‘14π³8π―7
π₯ CALLOOOR [11.5x] β callofzeus β 33.4K β 383.1K (1h) A48KeWUuiDSdRQBqAFssgyYATDuBv7cer54V2JSDpump
π12π―10β‘9π€‘7π³6
There is few others which im lookin at Lowkey waiting for good entries to bid
π€‘12π―8β‘7π7π³5
Lots of new memes are spawning rn as onchain is good But market is pure rotational, you better be more comfy at mid-cap and high cap ones, let the community be more strong Alike $CATE, $Cupsey, $CASHCAT and so on
β‘11π€‘9π³8π7π―7
$ORANGE launched by good team, chart moving well, you can watch for entries too. NFA/DYOR Bitcoin is the $ORANGE coin. Saylor tweets orange every other day. Ansem, Elon, and even official Bitcoin accounts have all called it the orange coin. The lore for $ORANGE dates all the way back to 2010: https://x.com/orange_coin_sol/status/2087088867518095410?s=46 https://t.me/OrangeCoinOnSOL https://x.com/i/communities/2000β¦
π11π―8π€‘5β‘3π³3
Yo @callofzeus, CATS just went from 36.5K to 94.5K in a flashβ159% gain faster than my portal gun on turbo mode! β $CATS β π
π³14π7π€‘6π―5β‘3
Lunar Lad - $LAD "A forgotten pixel character escaped an old-school video game and landed on the Solana blockchain." This has been going up and I've been waiting for a dip to post will watch it closely for if it comes. DYOR Find ur own entry https://dexscreener.com/solana/J7DKJjzuUUYbodFMFjomy7aG3bW93DEJKSUYvbLsBoeN https://lunarlad.com https://t.me/Lunarladsol
π11π€‘7π―5β‘4π³4
$CASHCAT CashCat Chain is an EVM Layer 3 built on the Robinhood Chain, powered by $CASHCAT as its native gas token. $CCC is the governance token for the network and its ecosystem, primarily used for protocol decisions, treasury management, incentive mechanisms, and future network upgrades. Contract Address: 0xddeC0170cEB4426eA05F2fbD485DffA4FAFA6615 DexScreener: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x4f191687224e9e2β¦
π―10π³9π€‘8π7β‘5
Sending https://dexscreener.com/solana/j3hkh2ne88wrie1shpe53jd7ke12e2lmg7cnlb4bjftn
π10π³7π―5π€‘5β‘3
Gate just listed PARKIFY, is this about to begin??? 7Syw6tu4Jx692uhoryjok5yBwTqje1oftit9E3LHpump
π³7π7π€‘6β‘3π―2β€1π₯1
Sticker, posted without a caption
β‘13π13π―13π€‘11π³6
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @zeus_gem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππππ πππ πβ (@zeus_gem), 53,548 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zeus_gem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.