Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sol Trading Bot Announcement

@SolTradingBot_Channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,203subscribers

-70 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002007167889
TypeChannel
Username@SolTradingBot_Channel
Description🚀 SolTradingBot: The Ultimate High-Speed Sniper and Trading Bot on Solana🤖 BOT: @SolTradingBot Channel: @SolTradingBot_Channel Chat: @SolTradingBot_Portal https://twitter.com/SolTradingBot https://soltradingbot.com
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SolTradingBot_Channel

Growth

21,20321,27321,2387 August 2026 — 21,273 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,273 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,269 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,251 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,244 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,231 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,221 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,203 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,193–21,284 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:5221,203-18
11 Aug 2026, 13:3221,221-10
10 Aug 2026, 16:0721,231-13
9 Aug 2026, 17:4221,244-7
8 Aug 2026, 19:2621,251-18
7 Aug 2026, 21:1621,269-4
7 Aug 2026, 11:4521,273no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:3421,273first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.14%
avg views ÷ 21,203 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,090
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.367%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held20 (23 February 202616 July 2026)
Views total1,090
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
227
Videos
9
Links
138

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

507 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12524.7%
👍10119.9%
🔥9518.7%
🎉9017.8%
😁469.07%
🤩397.69%
🥰50.986%
💊40.789%
❤‍🔥10.197%
👏10.197%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 507reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC≈1,090 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Introducing SolTradingBot Signal Bot - @stbotsignalbot Bring real-time Solana alpha straight to your TG community with our new Signal Bot. Our system continuously scans on-chain activity across Solana to surface potential opportunities before they reach the crowd. Customize your affiliate link, grow your community, and earn from every trade your members make. 👉 Add @stbotsignalbot to your Telegram group or chan

2🎉1💊1

20 Jun 2026, 16:55 UTC≈1,880 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎲 Random Buy/Sell on SolTradingBot Stop buying the exact same amount every time Set your Min and Max amount, and STBOT will randomly execute each Buy or Sell within your selected range Built for traders who want more flexibility and smarter trades 👉 Available now on @SolTradingBot

4💊1

23 May 2026, 17:23 UTC≈8,580 views447 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔎 Let's explore Token Search on SolTradingBot You can now search tokens directly inside our Bot without leaving Telegram. Use /search command on @SolTradingBot to instantly find matching tokens by name or symbol and start trading faster. 🏹 Let STBOT be your useful weapon on Solana!

👍100🔥90🎉8983😁45🤩39💊1

21 May 2026, 17:56 UTC≈1,890 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔔 Token Alerts on SolTradingBot You can now create instant alerts directly on STBOT and get notified when your token conditions are triggered. Use /alert on @SolTradingBot to start tracking your favorite tokens now! 🔥 Fast, simple, and fully integrated with SolTradingBot

3💊1

14 May 2026, 18:18 UTC≈2,030 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Opened the “Reliable” case and it was just SolTradingBot the whole time 😅 https://x.com/SolTradingBot/status/2054989604793839805?s=20

7 May 2026, 16:10 UTC≈1,810 viewsread 12 August 2026

Quote of the day 👇 https://x.com/SolTradingBot/status/2052420678511669565?s=20

1 May 2026, 17:46 UTC≈2,030 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Leave your thoughts 👇 https://x.com/SolTradingBot/status/2050270288877859238?s=20

6

20 Apr 2026, 15:17 UTC≈2,170 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Say GM 👇 https://x.com/SolTradingBot/status/2046246851641593918?s=20

4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SolTradingBot_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 426,196 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Maestro Bot Updates
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 193,571
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Maestro Hub
@MaestroBotsHub · 172,101
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sol Trading Bot Announcement” (@SolTradingBot_Channel), 21,203 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SolTradingBot_Channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.