Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mayers official calls

Channel

Mayers official calls

@mayerscallz

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

20,529subscribers

+10,595 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002171096843
TypeChannel
Username@mayerscallz
DescriptionFocused on early-stage market research, emerging narratives, and high-conviction opportunities across the crypto space. Main: @xmayerss Scouts: @Kirki0x
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mayerscallz

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 9 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@DegenSeals/1794210 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC@mayerscallz/2149 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC1.002.4 hours
@DegenSeals/1809924 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC@mayerscallz/2213 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC1.0028 minutes
@DegenSeals/1809724 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC@mayerscallz/2215 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC1.0080 minutes
@DegenSeals/182733 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC@mayerscallz/2308 · this entry3 Sept 2026, 11:49 UTC1.0045 minutes
@DegenSeals/182894 Sept 2026, 12:17 UTC@mayerscallz/2316 · this entry4 Sept 2026, 12:25 UTC1.008 minutes
@DegenSeals/186171 Oct 2026, 03:59 UTC@mayerscallz/2504 · this entry1 Oct 2026, 04:22 UTC1.0023 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@DegenSeals23 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.991.7 hours@DegenSeals (23–0)
@SIGNALCALLS14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.9 hours@SIGNALCALLS (14–0)
@BossmanCallsOfficial13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.5 hours@BossmanCallsOfficial (13–0)
@Teslacallsofficial9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0015 minutes@Teslacallsofficial (9–0)
@Defidoxxcalls8 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005.5 hours@Defidoxxcalls (6–2)
@minidraftgamble6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9925 minutes@minidraftgamble (5–1)
@fuddles_studio_calls5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.5 hours@fuddles_studio_calls (3–2)
@zeus_gem5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.992.4 hours@zeus_gem (4–1)
@marine_CryptoCalls5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.993.8 hours@marine_CryptoCalls (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 80 of the 81 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 204 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

9,40935,88022,644.57 August 2026 — 9,934 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,934 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,908 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,409 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,055 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,925 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,789 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,734 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,686 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,651 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,568 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,488 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,427 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,406 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,398 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,340 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,278 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,162 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,117 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,086 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,036 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,984 subscribers5 September 2026 — 25,957 subscribers8 September 2026 — 35,880 subscribers11 September 2026 — 35,751 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,662 subscribers14 September 2026 — 26,575 subscribers16 September 2026 — 23,848 subscribers18 September 2026 — 23,791 subscribers1 October 2026 — 21,069 subscribers6 October 2026 — 20,977 subscribers10 October 2026 — 20,893 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,842 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,814 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,755 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,738 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,735 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,728 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,718 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,698 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,687 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,674 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,666 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,928 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,900 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,895 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,882 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,446 subscribers30 October 2026 — 20,853 subscribers31 October 2026 — 20,782 subscribers1 November 2026 — 20,760 subscribers2 November 2026 — 20,741 subscribers3 November 2026 — 20,729 subscribers4 November 2026 — 20,712 subscribers5 November 2026 — 20,704 subscribers6 November 2026 — 20,687 subscribers7 November 2026 — 20,641 subscribers8 November 2026 — 20,598 subscribers10 November 2026 — 20,529 subscribers20,5297 August 202610 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 95 days, net +10,595. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,438–39,851 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 06:3120,529-69
8 Nov 2026, 17:3920,598-43
7 Nov 2026, 10:1120,641-46
6 Nov 2026, 07:4920,687-17
5 Nov 2026, 05:4820,704-8
4 Nov 2026, 05:5820,712-17
3 Nov 2026, 03:4520,729-12
2 Nov 2026, 01:1120,741-19
1 Nov 2026, 04:3920,760-22
31 Oct 2026, 03:2620,782-71
30 Oct 2026, 00:4520,853+7,407
29 Oct 2026, 02:4013,446+2,564
28 Oct 2026, 02:4710,882-13
27 Oct 2026, 00:1610,895-5
26 Oct 2026, 03:4510,900-28
25 Oct 2026, 04:4610,928-1,738
24 Oct 2026, 05:5712,666-8
23 Oct 2026, 06:5012,674-13
22 Oct 2026, 08:5112,687-11
20 Oct 2026, 23:1112,698first reading

Engagement

259 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 20,529 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,520
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.651%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 259 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held259 (29 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total112,605
Reactions total733
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 03:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,150
Videos
≈51
Links
≈1,320

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 33s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,088 reactions across 259 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,47920.5%
👍2,45220.3%
❤2,15717.8%
🎉1,54812.8%
👏1,1409.43%
❤‍🔥5814.81%
🐳3813.15%
💯3773.12%
🤩3182.63%
🥰2692.23%
😍2401.99%
😁820.678%
🏆410.339%
⚡180.149%
🤝50.041%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 259 of the 259 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,088 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 259 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 259 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mayerscallz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 259 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 19:59 UTC≈3,350 views60 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🔥 timmy [14.8x] ├ Alexis1_5 └ 49.1K → 727.8K (3d) TiMSdJrkVwUpeEWJpuqRvHt4wVS7uH77LbNPGGVJXNw Turn alerts off in /settings

👏22❤20🎉18

10 Nov 2026, 16:16 UTC≈3,970 views61 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🪙 $GANG Aping this bit old play, which is about gaming and Colosseum frontier hackathon winning game as well. Seeing they are followed by Solana and some other big accounts so i think if or when gaming meta heats up onchain, this can go hard. Also looks like he is the dev : https://x.com/nftimm syQqkspvb2PRr1meJ5pJDmhgxwc4hUou2TMjjrTmeta

🔥22👏20❤19

10 Nov 2026, 16:14 UTC≈3,380 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🔥 ORVIOAI [65.8x] ├ S2p33dkol └ 2K → 130.8K (1h) 0x7a2943af1f5384d4da4ebf852e38b134dfc81d57 Turn alerts off in /settings

👍3🔥3😁3

9 Nov 2026, 10:19 UTC34 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

BALLAST, quick breakdown a token launchpad on robinhood chain and elysium, running on its own uniswap fees go back to the token: on robinhood chain every swap pays 3% inside the pool, 80% to the creator side and 20% buys and burns $BALLAST. on elysium (gen 5, beta) the creator picks a fee from 1 to 10%, locked at launch, with limit orders built into the hook 57M+ $BALLAST burned so far, all from real swap fees cr…

🎉7🔥5❤4

7 Nov 2026, 12:24 UTC≈2,460 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026

⚡️ ZENO — #MIGRATED! ├ 46.2K • Age: 1d, 14h └ Alexis1_5 @ 15K [3.1x] (1d) 0x31ced11f076e45da2508da2db4a2f296021a1e21 Turn alerts off in /settings

😁4❤3🎉2

6 Nov 2026, 21:56 UTC≈3,210 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Packed is looking very strong. Just saw OD (overdose) has aped and is in. Slow cook to millions again? 👀 Ca: 0x853e1a36876cc4538be636b78e7b2bd0aabc0ded

🔥6❤4🎉4

6 Nov 2026, 11:07 UTC≈2,890 views55 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Added even more to my $MAMESUKE bag here The chart is moving perfectly and looks like it wants to jump back to ATHs soon Market has been slow but during this time you have to look for projects that show relative strength and are attracting new holders Can easily see this shoot back up in no time at all, especially with the next episode coming out super soon. SCGBBnSwnekytGFHgyeHHxPMiN7xDxsWFGg9JgFSTNK

👍22💯17👏16

5 Nov 2026, 23:04 UTC≈3,260 views64 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$STANK bros! 1m tapped and the chart looking absolutely amazing! Feel like this continues way higher, as it followed the exact playbook I said it would. Strength during quiet market -> market participants realise how good of a narra it is when the market returns. Send it all so much higher. We up! 5wsjHxT5nW5jQuVupXUNnYszF3WoWCfGGk9LMcsCJzY8

👏24🎉21👍19

5 Nov 2026, 23:04 UTC≈2,780 views73 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

And there goes ANOTHER 2X on $BATON. This coin has one of the strongest communities on Pump.fun, and we’ve seen it survive massive drawdowns before. The conviction never disappeared. The community never left. Literally called that bottom to perfection. Insider fam has been PRINTING this week. We’re just getting started.

🔥27🎉26❤20

5 Nov 2026, 23:04 UTC34 views73 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$CATPAD chart looking to pump from here it’ll breakout to make new high Pretty obvious 2gTbp2gwH46rqExzabSyrdR3294SLwCp2rSqWDS6Sim1 https://dexscreener.com/solana/GU2ajBKEBpvXumm27t41XEteVUsbvrwGhDmJW7FDc4BN

🔥28❤25👍20

3 Nov 2026, 10:09 UTC≈3,410 views19 reactionsread 11 November 2026

⚡️ TRENCHER — #MIGRATED! ├ 40.7K • Age: 12h, 54m └ Alexis1_5 @ 18.8K [2.2x] (7h) 8rMKmGTdLqx6xNvjLMARQxRQMXtvE4jnDY8ZqN2wpump Turn alerts off in /settings

🎉8👍7🔥4

3 Nov 2026, 10:06 UTC566 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

2x smashed on $STANK This chart has slowly been grinding up whilst the rest of the market seems to halt to 0. I feel confident if we see even the slightest bit of green on-chain this could lead it. Last night some of the biggest Stonk whales on FOMO were interacting and I’ve also seen some big fart coin wallets ape in. Shit looks good. 5wsjHxT5nW5jQuVupXUNnYszF3WoWCfGGk9LMcsCJzY8

🔥5🎉4😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 259 posts we hold for @mayerscallz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @mayerscallz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
23 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mayers official calls” (@mayerscallz), 20,529 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mayerscallz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.