5.5x plus, 165k π₯ $RFE π₯
β€26π24π20π₯19π10

Channel
@fuddles_studio_calls
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
28,159subscribers
+7,526 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002375492663 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fuddles_studio_calls |
| Description | Always remember only NFA/DYOR good luck π Any info or update reach out to @Fuddles_Ceo Warnings βΌοΈ: Payments should only be made to @Fuddles_Ceo anyone else is scam at your own Risk β οΈ |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fuddles_studio_calls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 28,159 | -147 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 28,306 | +9,651 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 18,655 | -1,263 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 19,918 | -208 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 20,126 | -217 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 20,343 | -122 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 20,465 | -168 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 20,633 | first reading |
74 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 72 of 74 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 74 (4 August 2026 β 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 71,108 |
| Reactions total | 8,131 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 15 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
8,131 reactions across 72 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 1,146 | 14.1% | |
| π | 1,121 | 13.8% | |
| β€ | 1,114 | 13.7% | |
| π | 1,086 | 13.4% | |
| π€© | 677 | 8.33% | |
| π― | 644 | 7.92% | |
| π₯° | 627 | 7.71% | |
| π | 618 | 7.60% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 617 | 7.59% | |
| π | 481 | 5.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 8,131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
5.5x plus, 165k π₯ $RFE π₯
β€26π24π20π₯19π10
$CETS ATH to those who celebrate and believe https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0xdabbd019c0174bdae6354f32b158d42e4a0e7489 0xB0c2aB5af4028461acE3f6e1C33a4eE1404E7777
π25π₯21π20π18β€14
When this bonds it will be over 1ETH per Cycle. Powerball that ran to 600k had 90% payout. While this has 100% Payout. I'll dex it around 25k to 30k so we set for bonding
π25β€23π19π17π₯16
(π₯ETH) Reflect Earn Gambles Channel π² $RFE. New Launch. Following reflections rewards meta. Similar to RFI which did well in 2020. "Hold $RFE, every trade reflects into your wallet. No staking, no claiming, no gas. The number just goes up LP Locked and reflections are working. 50% is sent to the original RFI deployer to pay homage to Morpheus (RFI DEV from 2020), hopefully to encourage him to come back and create soβ¦
β€27π17π17π17π₯17
3x plus, 452k π₯ $RKC π₯
π₯27π23π19π17β€13
$RKCπ₯ The community seems solid and interesting. Let's see where it goes, to the moon or to dust. Check out their entries. π₯ROBINHOOD Contract: 0x5561D1D8918A7B56b6512637C3B4589c6937dFF8 CHART: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x0b92f58548596aca757cc61f07b686f059da63cb Tg: https://t.me/rambokittencrewrh
π23π22π18π₯18β€15
π₯ Xiaotu [5.1x] β Fuddles_Ceo β 42.7K β 218.3K (27m) HxJZ7fxthZhs57e9fCDfm7s3DLc1favN2JmAG9EApump
π₯25π23π19π18β€14
Sticker, posted without a caption
mr beast psyop soft shilling tung in his new short video 23m views already https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LiH-P4rSkLI
π₯26π21π20π16β€15
$CAP is worth watching. Building on-chain credit infrastructure focused on secured USD lending. CA: 0x99991c6AAbba5a096f24f250b73580F5179b9999 DYOR. NFA.
β€23π22π20π18π₯16
The team behind $TUT, which recently reached a $280M MC, is now building around $Z β GenZ. Theyβve already had multiple projects run into the 9-figure range, and the GenZ narrative is starting to attract serious attention. Binance and major media are already talking about it. I caught $Z early and shared it with Gem Insider before bringing it to the main channel. Currently around $29.5M MC. CA: 0x9adc3d87e053eeeβ¦
π23π22β€18π18π₯16
Kinda $CHIC Gem A trend this popular makes this market cap criminally low Considering how coins like this have previously skyrocketed to million-dollar market caps, weβre still early Just look at how many celebrities and companies are using this phrase on Instagram, TikTok, and X KINDA CHIC MODE ON HWzUC1x4WAyHjvKM9XtAxmd9PwNwjySgt4PXDN7opump
π24π21π₯20π18β€16
Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @fuddles_studio_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@fuddles_studio_calls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ¨πππππ¦ π¦π§π¨πππ’ πππππ¦β (@fuddles_studio_calls), 28,159 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fuddles_studio_calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.