Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Игорь Терещенков

Channel

Игорь Терещенков

@waves89

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,398subscribers

+298 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001384494068
TypeChannel
Username@waves89
DescriptionАнализирую, инвестирую, торгую, перечисляю слова через запятую и юзаю Волновой принцип Эллиотта тут с 01.07.2016 Сперва сюда: https://t.me/waves89/26 Личка: @ew_trader Закрытый канал и чат: https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=s87a Рекламы нет и не будет!
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/waves89

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,08613,40113,243.513,3986 August 202610 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 96 days, net +298. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,039–13,448 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 12:4613,398-3
9 Nov 2026, 01:0113,401+2
7 Nov 2026, 18:0613,399+14
6 Nov 2026, 16:1913,385+15
5 Nov 2026, 14:4013,370+4
4 Nov 2026, 13:4813,366-4
3 Nov 2026, 10:1513,370-5
2 Nov 2026, 13:3613,375-5
1 Nov 2026, 16:5413,380+7
31 Oct 2026, 18:3913,373+3
30 Oct 2026, 17:3113,370-1
29 Oct 2026, 16:3713,371-1
27 Oct 2026, 12:4513,372+11
26 Oct 2026, 12:1613,361+16
25 Oct 2026, 15:0913,345+3
24 Oct 2026, 11:3613,342+17
23 Oct 2026, 09:4413,325-4
22 Oct 2026, 10:4613,329+1
20 Oct 2026, 04:1013,328-5
19 Oct 2026, 04:0813,333first reading

Engagement

165 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.3%
avg views ÷ 13,398 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,920
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
44
of 165 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held165 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total172,490
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 07:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,120
Videos
≈179
Links
≈3,960

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 44 posts held from the last 30 days (11.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 17:45 UTC≈2,450 viewsread 11 November 2026

Позицию по Nvidia сегодня сформировал лонговую. Объясню теперь на пальцах почему. Коротко: это подгон к саммиту АТЭС, на котором будут решаться судьбы мира. 19 ноября не только ГТА6 выйдет, но ещё и состоится встреча Си и Трампа. С Путиным, но это сейчас вторично для поднятой темы. Важно, что Китаю нужны чипы и Тайвань, а Штатам нужно ядерное разоружение и редкозёмы. Вполне вероятно, что происходящее с акциями нек…

Signed Igor Tereshchenkov

10 Nov 2026, 15:35 UTC≈2,640 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed Igor Tereshchenkov

10 Nov 2026, 08:46 UTC≈3,180 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Пузырь ИИ проткнули членом? Вижу, что все аналитики бегают по потолку с криками о крахе технологического сектора США, что за собой должен потянуть все остальные рынки. Я не согласен – ещё рано. В видео, что выходило в пятницу, давал вот такую разметку по S&P500, она же была вот в этом посте в тот же день. Там был отмечен уровень 7236, который если останется жив, то будет рост на ATH. И с тех пор индекс вырос на 4% …

Signed Igor Tereshchenkov

9 Nov 2026, 11:06 UTC≈3,470 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Я может и не по самым хаям фиксанул Энвидию, но зато сильно выше текущих цен. #NVDA, 4H, Сейчас рассматриваю по ней спекулятивные покупки через call опционы. Шпионские дела вряд ли сделают бизнес компании хуже. Думается, ещё как минимум один виток роста ИИ-пузыря мы увидим. Выше показывал, как агенты за $200 подписки и всего за 3 дня делают рутину, за которую люди берут от $2 000 за каждую ветвь. Экономический выхл…

Signed Igor Tereshchenkov

9 Nov 2026, 10:50 UTC≈3,390 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

По итогу полных трёх суток работы, агенты раскрутили две ветви и нашли 179 родственников, из которых 52 – прямые мои предки. С документальными подтверждениями. Увлекательно.

Signed Igor Tereshchenkov

8 Nov 2026, 09:57 UTC≈3,530 viewsread 11 November 2026

🎞️ Перезалил ролик про протесты и долговой кризис в Европе. Рассказал о том, как это видят люди изнутри и почему они выходят на самом деле на улицы. Ютуб | ВК | Дзен | ОК | Рутуб

Signed Igor Tereshchenkov

7 Nov 2026, 18:29 UTC≈3,780 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня Димитриевская родительская суббота — один из главных дней поминовения усопших. По этому поводу я заморочился сегодня со своей родословной. Удалось по одной из ветвей с помощью ИИ-агентов дойти до 1750-х годов. Все родственники с документальными подтверждениями существования, без ии-шных галюцинаций. Понравилось. Продолжу собирать древо дальше. Кому интересен такой контент – сделаю видео в Тайное собрание чере…

Signed Igor Tereshchenkov

6 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC≈4,330 viewsread 11 November 2026

🎞️ Про выборы-выборы в США, победу демократов, проигрыш Трампа, войну на Ближнем Востоке, происходящее с нефтью и мировыми акциями вышел новый ролик на ютубе! Разобрал, как падение мировых и американских акций связано с борьбой за власть в США, а также глянул под этим углом на скам крипты. И что из победы ослов следует для России, Украины и Европы. Приятного просмотра: https://youtu.be/-8PBqsbx5Gw Регистрация на бе…

Signed Igor Tereshchenkov

6 Nov 2026, 09:33 UTC≈4,270 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

15 апреля последний раз тут обновлял дневки по Сиплому. Тогда его цена была 6975, а я прогнозировал 7700+. Получилось в пике пока 7850. Прогноз считаю исполненным. Дальше сложнее. Почему – написал в предыдущем посте. #SPX, 1D, Пока цел уровень волны "iv" of (v) of [v] of "3" – это 7240, сохраняются неплохие шансы на обновление исторических максимумов индексом до конца года. В случае его пробития, рост будет возможен…

Signed Igor Tereshchenkov

6 Nov 2026, 09:24 UTC≈4,040 viewsread 11 November 2026

БП или коррекция? Вопрос даже не на миллион, а сразу на триллион. Поделюсь соображениями по поводу резкого падения мировых рынков вчера. Которое я откупал через call опционы на технологический сектор США. Это действие – не инвестиция и не прогноз о новых хаях, это просто спекуляция, чтобы отыграть крайне негативный сентимент, где все ждут финансовый Армагеддон. Его не будет. По ВА я оцениваю максимальный потенциал …

Signed Igor Tereshchenkov

5 Nov 2026, 20:05 UTC≈4,060 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Зачем я вчера покупал нефть наглядно.

Signed Igor Tereshchenkov

5 Nov 2026, 17:30 UTC≈4,240 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#AMD, 1H, К слову о том, зачем вовремя надо фиксировать прибыль и какой вообще смысл от Волнового анализа. Ведь он (типо) не работает по времени.

Signed Igor Tereshchenkov

Showing the 12 most recent of 165 posts we hold for @waves89. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@waves89 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
5 November 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CRYPTO | PERRY
@cryptoperry · 22,279
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
IVASCO | Иващенко Юрий
@yivashchenko · 28,229
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
Игорь Андреев |Трейдинг|Волновой анализ
@igorcryptotrader · 30,157
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
Pursuit4Million|Андрей Соболев
@P4M_channel · 31,737
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
Vesperfin
@vesperfin · 36,895
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
TradeZone | Артём Назаров - трейдинг и инвестиции
@trade_zone · 55,017
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Trader`s University
@tradingplusforex · 22,699
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Игорь Терещенков” (@waves89), 13,398 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waves89.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.