Закрытая аналитика и торговые идеи крупнейших инвестдомов мира.
Канал Дмитрия Котегова и Василия Белокрылецкого
Сопровождение инвестиционных портфелей от $1м, свяжитесь с нами: @abeta_clients
Created
18 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,812–27,890 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 10:57
27,834
-9
16 Sept 2026, 06:37
27,843
-8
14 Sept 2026, 15:40
27,851
-5
13 Sept 2026, 05:21
27,856
-8
11 Sept 2026, 10:17
27,864
-17
8 Sept 2026, 15:15
27,881
+7
5 Sept 2026, 09:22
27,874
+19
3 Sept 2026, 09:43
27,855
-4
2 Sept 2026, 02:53
27,859
-1
1 Sept 2026, 03:07
27,860
+7
31 Aug 2026, 03:36
27,853
+11
30 Aug 2026, 00:36
27,842
+7
28 Aug 2026, 23:38
27,835
+14
27 Aug 2026, 23:26
27,821
-9
27 Aug 2026, 02:06
27,830
-12
26 Aug 2026, 02:46
27,842
-6
25 Aug 2026, 03:46
27,848
-2
23 Aug 2026, 18:59
27,850
+21
22 Aug 2026, 01:45
27,829
-3
20 Aug 2026, 17:07
27,832
first reading
Engagement
72 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.71%
avg views ÷ 27,834 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,870
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 72 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
72 (18 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
56,002
Reactions total
459
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 23:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,090
Videos
≈41
Links
≈4,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,002 reactions across 70 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
434
43.3%
👍
404
40.3%
🔥
121
12.1%
👎
29
2.89%
😡
14
1.40%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,002 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 71 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aabeta. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 72 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
*Broadcom – покупаем на коррекции?
✅ Broadcom #AVGO
🎯 Целевая цена - $540, потенциал роста +53%
Компания становится одним из ключевых поставщиков физической инфраструктуры для искусственного интеллекта.
Мы считаем, что сейчас формируется отличная возможность для приобретения акций компании, подкрепленная как результатами Broadcom, так и ситуацией на рынке. Представили обоснование идеи в этой публикации.
➡️ Ключев…
Кто заработает на Physical AI?
⠀
Еще недавно гуманоиды были дорогим экспериментом. Теперь роботы дешевеют, модели становятся сильнее, а срок окупаемости промышленного гуманоида приближается к двум годам. Это уже экономика, способная запустить массовый спрос на роботизацию.
⠀
➡️ Но инвестору стоит смотреть шире самих производителей гуманоидов: зарабатывать на Physical AI будут и компании, которым не важно, кто именно …
Собрали главные материалы за неделю – если пропустили, читайте сейчас.
Аналитика, идеи, кейсы
→ Идеи для роста вне рыночных колебаний
→ Разбор отчетов 5 бигтехов - что купить, что продать?
→ Золото после заседания ФРС - стоит ли продавать?
→ Доходности на пике кризиса 2008 - пора в кеш?
→ Отвечаем на вопросы про металлы, нефть, валюту и другие идеи
💎 Abeta Invest Club - приглашаем стать частью сильного инвестиционн…
На вебинарах мы получаем от вас вопросы по отдельным акциям, ETF, металлам и другим инвестиционным идеям. Собрали несколько вопросов с ответами здесь.
Важно отметить: отдельная идея может быть интересной сама по себе, но мы всегда смотрим на решения системно – насколько она подходит конкретному портфелю с учетом его целей, риск-профиля и уже существующей структуры.
Вопрос 1️⃣
Хотелось бы понять ваш взгляд на перспе…
Рост ожиданий повышения ставки, доходности бондов вновь на максимуме с 2007 года, прорыв Meta в AI
S&P 500 на волатильной неделе прибавил всего 0.1%. В начале недели поддержку получили компании, связанные с AI-инфраструктурой, после успешного запуска AI-агента Muse от Meta.
Агент расширяет потенциальную монетизацию AI за пределы существующего рекламного бизнеса и, на наш взгляд, создает предпосылки для переоценки к…
Где найти надежного брокера в ОАЭ? К кому обратиться по вопросам наследования? Кто может порекомендовать управляющего активами или эксперта по токенизации?
⠀
Такие вопросы требуют рекомендаций от людей, чьему опыту можно доверять. Именно для этого мы создали Abeta Invest Club.
⠀
📍Клуб строится на взаимном обмене: каждый участник приходит со своим опытом, знаниями и контактами и получает доступ к опыту других.
Здес…
Золото после заседания ФРС: коррекция или продолжение роста?
На прошлой неделе ФРС повысила ставку на 25 б.п. до 3,75–4% и дала жесткий сигнал. Для золота это краткосрочный риск: высокие ставки и доходности облигаций повышают привлекательность процентных активов и могут провоцировать отток из золотых ETF.
В этом материале разберем, чего ждать от золота с учетом новых вводных.
➡️ Центральные банки продолжают наращи…
Друзья, 17 сентября мы провели ежемесячный вебинар для частных инвесторов - обсудили, как изменилась рыночная ситуация и какие решения в портфеле мы считаем наиболее интересными прямо сейчас.
📍В прямом эфире:
→ Разобрали, что будет с акциями после повышения ставки ФРС
→ Дали взгляд на доходности облигаций после максимума с 2007 года
→ Провели трезвую оценку конфликта на Ближнем Востоке
→ Подчеркнули, почему все еще…
AI на проверке прибылью - кто прошел главный тест сезона?
⠀
Сезон отчетности дал один из самых важных сигналов за весь AI-цикл: стало видно, где сотни миллиардов долларов инвестиций уже дают реальную отдачу, а где расходы пока растут быстрее результата.
⠀
Отчетности Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta и Nvidia показали, насколько далеко каждая компания продвинулась в окупаемости AI-инвестиций - но кто прошел тест на от…
🤩Собрали главные материалы за неделю – если пропустили, читайте сейчас.
Аналитика, идеи, кейсы
→ 8 главных акций эры ИИ - их невозможно заменить
→ Жесткая ФРС, опасения за замедление AI, Ближний Востоке не утихает
→ 10+ инвестидей в Physical AI: успеть до массового внедрения
Private Market
→ Revolut: шаг к лицензии банка США и первый AI-платеж во Франции
→ Crusoe законтрактовал облачные мощности для Perplexity
→…
Жесткая ФРС, опасения за замедление AI, Ближний Востоке не утихает
S&P 500 завершает волатильную неделю практически без изменений. В начале недели технологии оказались под давлением после заявлений руководителей крупнейших разработчиков LLM о необходимости замедлить создание наиболее продвинутых моделей.
Мы считаем реакцию избыточной: подобные ограничения дополнительно повышают барьеры для новых игроков, а у америк…
ФРС ужесточила тон: как менять портфель после заседания
ФРС переходит в «ястребиный» режим. Центральный банк впервые с 2023 года повысил ставку и объявил, что может продолжить. Главная причина - инфляция по-прежнему остается высокой, а экономика - устойчивой.
📣 Друзья, сегодня в 17:00 МСК на вебинаре подробно разберем:
→ Почему не стоит паниковать после жесткого заседания ФРС
→ Как могут повести себя акции, облига…
👍11🔥4❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @aabeta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@aabeta edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 September 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Freedom Broker @FREEDOMFINANCEKAZAKHSTAN · 21,536 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
АКЦИОНЕР | Бизнес и Финансы @iamakcioner · 25,974 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
FREEDOM FINANCE OFFICIAL @FREEDOMFINANCE · 25,756 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
БАЗА Бизнеса | Финансы @BizBazza · 58,399 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Invest Era @usamarke1 · 60,915 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
СОЛОДИН LIVE @goodtraders · 45,035 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Панель Приборов FTT @Ta_ftt · 28,280 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
Инвестиции на диване @div_invest · 98,766 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
КапиталопедиЯ |Инвест Идеи @kapitalopedia · 21,045 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
headlines GEO @headlines_geo · 20,073 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 September 2026
Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич @wallet_with_bitcoins · 86,686 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Abeta - акции, облигации, аналитика” (@aabeta), 27,834 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aabeta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.