🚀 Get the latest Bitcoin, crypto, and global economic news in 25+ languages. Stay informed with timely, objective updates from Bitcoin.com News.
📢 Follow us on X: x.com/BitcoinNews
🌎 Read more: news.bitcoin.com
🔥 Advertising: ads@bitcoin.com
Created
18 September 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
Recorded in 2019 as “News.Bitcoin.com” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1,288. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,756–60,430 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 08:34
60,237
+147
11 Aug 2026, 08:44
60,090
+705
10 Aug 2026, 05:20
59,385
-421
9 Aug 2026, 04:11
59,806
-166
8 Aug 2026, 02:49
59,972
+571
7 Aug 2026, 00:46
59,401
+452
6 Aug 2026, 01:36
58,949
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:59
58,949
first reading
Engagement
81 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.36%
avg views ÷ 60,237 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,020
81 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.596%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
81
of 81 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 78 of 81 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
81 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
163,819
Reactions total
958
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈18,100
Videos
≈581
Links
≈48,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
789 reactions across 69 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
331
42.0%
👍
233
29.5%
🔥
72
9.13%
👎
60
7.60%
😁
36
4.56%
😱
20
2.53%
🤯
13
1.65%
👏
11
1.39%
🥰
8
1.01%
🐳
2
0.253%
🤔
2
0.253%
😡
1
0.127%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 958reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📲 Over 1,800 BTC were stolen in an attack on Coldcard hardware wallets, per River data.
🔐 The vulnerability, present since 2021, stemmed from a weak random number generator, with more than 7,000 addresses affected, according to Galaxy Research.
📚 The event reinforces the need for due diligence. River encourages users to learn safe custody practices, as the security of your Bitcoin depends on the tools and knowledge…
🚪 Bitcoin's market structure is signaling a critical moment: "In The Doorway, Not The Room." The Seller Exhaustion Constant, a gauge measuring supply in profit against realized volatility, has hit a cycle low.
📊 While this 30-day average sits in the region where every past bottom has formed, it remains roughly a third above the absolute "floor" that every prior bear market eventually reached.
If past cycles are the…
🐳 Ethereum's oldest whales are stirring. A Genesis wallet just moved 2,680 ETH ($5.03M) after 11 years of dormancy. The original stake was just $830, a 605,924% gain.
📈 This is the fourth such awakening since July, with 8,680 ETH moved from deep storage. Funds are flowing into major exchanges like Coinbase and Coinjar, suggesting an intent to sell.
🤔 The cluster of movements raises questions about coordinated profi…
💳 Twenty One Capital's new CEO has laid out a 5-step plan to build businesses around its Bitcoin holdings. 🏗️📊
Raphael Zagury outlined the strategy in a shareholder letter on August 11, weeks after replacing Jack Mallers as CEO.
Over the past year, Bitcoin fell 41.8% while the S&P 500 gained 29.3% and Gold gained 29.2%, making BTC the worst performer of the three by a wide margin.
⚡ Bitcoin News Daily | August 11, 2026
📉 Bitcoin Drops 0.7% to $63,400 amid Liquidations
♾ Zuckerberg Says Everyone Will Soon Have AI
🔮 Coinbase Builds Abu Dhabi Hub to Put Global
🌐 Moneygram Brings Cash-to-crypto Payments to Solana with Rift
🪐 Anthropic Emerges as ‘FRONTIER AI Lab’ Behind Riot’s
Follow on X →
🥇 Peter Schiff says BItcoin is acting as gold's inverse amid war and inflation fears, calling it "anti-gold."
Gold is up 9% and silver 11% this year, while BTC is down 11%, a divergence Schiff says proves the "digital gold" narrative was never real.
🗞️ Bitcoin.com News
🇷🇺 The Bank of Russia set a limit for non-qualified investors purchasing up to 300,000 rubles of crypto per year from each intermediary.
Only Bitcoin, Ethereum and Tether USDT, will be available to these investors, based on market cap and a 5 year pricing history.
🗞️ Bitcoin.com News
📊 Anthropic Emerges as ‘Frontier AI Lab’ Behind Riot’s $9.1B AI Deal.
Anthropic has agreed to take 191 megawatts of computing capacity at Riot Platforms’ Rockdale campus in Texas.
📉 US spot ETFs and corporate treasuries handed back 65.8K BTC in June alone, the worst month on record, compared to a peak of 218K BTC absorbed in late 2024, according to Glassnode data.
Glassnode: The institutional rails... have spent the past quarter handing coin back.
🗞️ Bitcoin.com News
🇺🇸 Trump Media & Technology Group adds 4,662 Bitcoin to its treasury, bringing total holdings to 12,062 BTC, making it the 12th largest public Bitcoin treasury.
The firm's Q2 report outlined plans to implement a "more disciplined digital asset treasury management framework."
🗞️ Bitcoin.com News
⚖️ Bitcoin ETFs Shed $144.67M as 5-Day Inflow Streak Breaks.
Bitcoin ETFs opened the week with $144.
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @www_Bitcoin_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 52,636 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Cointelegraph @cointelegraph · 341,740 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bitcoin.com News” (@www_Bitcoin_com), 60,237 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/www_Bitcoin_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.