Crypto News Digest: Key Updates You Need to Know The current report features updates of Robinhood, Arbitrum, Pons, Chainlink, Securitize, Base, Cluster Protocol, Stellar, Coinbase, Jupiter, Hyperliquid, and Variational. CryptoDep | Community Chat | X | Telegram

Channel
CryptoDep - ICO & IEO
@cryptodep
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,948subscribers
-234 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001363462208 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptodep |
| Created | 1 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptodep |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 12,948 | -34 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 12,982 | -21 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 13,003 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 13,009 | -14 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 13,023 | -19 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 13,042 | -16 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 13,058 | -14 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 13,072 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 13,084 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:11 | 13,091 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 13,090 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 13,101 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 13,097 | +6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 13,091 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 13,098 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 13,105 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 13,115 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 13,117 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 13,122 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 13,127 | first reading |
Engagement
100 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.5%
- avg views ÷ 12,948 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,490
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 100 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 100 (31 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 26,790 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Securitize Partners With Socios on Sports Equity Securitize and Socios com are partnering to develop regulated tokenized equity offerings for minority stakes in professional sports teams. CryptoDep | Community Chat | X | Telegram
Chainlink to facilitate reserve verification for FRNT Chainlink Proof of Reserve will provide more continuous near-real-time, onchain verification of the reserves backing Wyoming’s Frontier Stable Token (FRNT). CryptoDep | Community Chat | X | Telegram
Summer Token Launches by Current FDV CAP leads summer launches at $696M current FDV, followed by DGrid at $642M and o1.Exchange at $547M. Teller holds closest to its ATH among the group, sitting at $206M versus a $216M peak. CryptoDep | Community Chat | X | Telegram
Stablecoins by Monthly Supply Growth Total stablecoin market cap hit $301B, up 1.24% MoM. RLUSD led supply growth at +63.6% while remaining the largest tracked stablecoin at $2.39B, well ahead of USDai's +41.7% growth on a much smaller $228M base. 👉🏻 defillama.com/stablecoins CryptoDep | Community Chat | X | Telegram
Leading Prediction Markets in Summer Kalshi dominates leading prediction markets at $114.1B in 90d volume, up 21.8%, and just landed exclusive US Open rights. Polymarket trails at $35.9B, down 42.9%, even as it closes in on a $1B raise at a $21B valuation. CryptoDep | Community Chat | X | Telegram
Crypto News Digest: Key Updates You Need to Know The current report features updates of Ethena, Chainlink, Payward, Circle, Binance, Pump Fun, OpenSea, Aster, X Money, Ethos, Linera, and Polymarket. CryptoDep | Community Chat | X | Telegram
Biggest Crypto Fundraising Events in Summer Presenting a list of the biggest crypto fundraising rounds in Summer 2026, backed by well-known investors such as a16z crypto, Coinbase Ventures, Paradigm, Pantera, Polychain Capital, Dragonfly, Payward, Bain Capital Crypto, and others. Let's take a look! CryptoDep | Community Chat | X | Telegram
Ethena introduces the internet money neobank Ethena Labs has launched Ethena Pay app, a new self-custodial money app on Avalanche, offering up to 6% yield and 10% card cashback. The beta app is available on iOS and Android, with access opening in stages across 48 countries. CryptoDep | Community Chat | X | Telegram
Payward to Tokenize LSE Stocks Kraken parent Payward has partnered with the London Stock Exchange to tokenize the 100 largest LSE-listed companies as 1:1-backed xStocks, with trading planned on the exchange's new LSE 24 venue pending regulatory approval. CryptoDep | Community Chat | X | Telegram
Crypto Cards by Summer Volume RedotPay dominates summer card volume at $1.15B, more than triple the combined total of the next four cards. Wirex One posted the standout move, up 1751% to $61.8M, the sharpest swing in the group by a wide margin. CryptoDep | Community Chat | X | Telegram
Polymarket has raised $1B in new funding led by 1789 Capital at $21B valuation Polymarket will raise $1B, with 1789 set to contribute around $300M. The new funding brings Polymarket's post-money valuation to $21B and comes at a time when the platform seeks regulatory approval to offer margin trading in the US. CryptoDep | Community Chat | X | Telegram
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @cryptodep. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptodiffer · 23,554
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
@cmcal_bot · 30,553
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
@ico_analytic · 56,869
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
@icodrops · 42,698
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
@crypto_fundraising · 28,062
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
@www_Bitcoin_com · 54,443
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@cryptodakuofficial · 49,775
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
@coingape · 23,136
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
@officialcryptodaily · 36,684
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
@PancakeSwapAnn · 28,564
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
@peaqnetwork · 42,491
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
@glassnode · 44,212
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
@cryptoquant_official · 55,749
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoDep - ICO & IEO” (@cryptodep), 12,948 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptodep.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.