17 measurements spanning 9 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,514–18,548 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 23:02
18,518
-1
14 Aug 2026, 07:24
18,519
no change
14 Aug 2026, 06:58
18,519
-7
12 Aug 2026, 21:15
18,526
+2
12 Aug 2026, 00:12
18,524
+1
11 Aug 2026, 18:04
18,523
+4
11 Aug 2026, 00:15
18,519
-6
10 Aug 2026, 17:04
18,525
-3
10 Aug 2026, 03:51
18,528
-11
9 Aug 2026, 15:12
18,539
-4
9 Aug 2026, 00:52
18,543
+13
7 Aug 2026, 21:16
18,530
-3
7 Aug 2026, 15:57
18,533
-5
7 Aug 2026, 10:45
18,538
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:39
18,538
-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:15
18,540
-4
6 Aug 2026, 07:15
18,544
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 3 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 18,518 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,610
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.458%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
19 (3 April 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
7,210
Reactions total
33
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,630
Videos
≈357
Links
≈15,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
355 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
177
49.9%
🔥
81
22.8%
👀
23
6.48%
❤🔥
20
5.63%
🕊
15
4.23%
🍌
13
3.66%
🤯
11
3.10%
🐳
9
2.54%
💯
6
1.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 355reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptocrunch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 April 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
A few weeks can completely change the story.
After several weeks of buying Bitcoin, Strategy's latest Michael Saylor's Strategy has reported three consecutive Bitcoin sales after three consecutive Bitcoin purchases.
Strategy's Reported Last 6 Bitcoin Trades:
🔴 3 Aug 2026: Sold 1,638 BTC (~$105M)
🔴 6 Jul 2026: Sold 2,225 BTC (~$135M)
🔴 30 Jun 2026: Sold 1,363 BTC (~$81M)
🟢 22 Jun 2026: Bought 520 BTC (~$35M)
🟢 15 J…
🚨BIG FACT: 🇺🇸 Retail Giant Costco Was 17 Times Smaller Than Walmart In 2000 Yet Delivered Nearly 28× Valuation Growth To $422 Billion While Walmart Grew Just 3× To $890 Billion By July 2026.
THIS RETAIL RACE WAS UNEXPECTED 😳🤯🛒
👉 Comment Here 💭
𝘗𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 — @CryptoCrunch
🚨🚨TREDNING: 🇺🇸 Jensen Huang's Nvidia And Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin Outperformed Tesla, Broadcom And Micron In The Latest 10-Year Returns Data By A Massive Margin.
NVIDIA LEFT EVERYONE FAR BEHIND 👀 🫡 🧡
👉Comment Here
𝘗𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 — @CryptoCrunch
🚨🚨BIG FACT: 🇺🇸 Every Person In The World’s Top 8 Richest Ranking Built Their Fortune Through Technology, Software, AI, Hardware Or The Internet, With Their Combined Wealth Now Exceeding $2.7 Trillion.
THINK ABOUT THAT FOR A SECOND ⚡️🤯
Comment Here 🗨️
𝘗𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 — @CryptoCrunch
🚨🚨TRENDING: 🇺🇸 A SpaceX Welder Earning $28 An Hour Turned A $10,000 Employee Stock Grant Into More Than $1 Million By Continuously Buying Additional Shares For 10 Years.
Juan Hernandez reportedly joined SpaceX in 2015 as a welder after immigrating from Mexico. He received an equity grant valued around $10,000 when he became a full-time employee and continued purchasing additional shares through payroll deductions ov…
🚨🚨BREAKING: 🇺🇸🇨🇦 Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan's $220 Million SpaceX Investment Made In 2019 Set To Become a ~$11.6 Billion Position After the $1.75T SpaceX IPO Next Week.
AMONG THE GREATEST INVESTMENT WINS 👀🙌👏
Back in 2019, Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan quietly invested about $220 million into SpaceX.
At the time, few could have imagined what would happen next.
Today, with SpaceX targeting a $1.75 trillion val…
🚨LATEST: 🇺🇸 Donald Trump Led United States Now Holds 328,372 BTC Worth ~$23.9B, More Than China And The UK Combined.
BEARS WON’T LIKE THIS TODAY 🧡😳😂
🇺🇸 United States: 328,372 BTC
🇨🇳 China: 190,000 BTC
🇬🇧 United Kingdom: 61,245 BTC
🇺🇦 Ukraine: 46,351 BTC
🇸🇻 El Salvador: 7,664 BTC
🇦🇪 UAE: 6,420 BTC
🇧🇹 Bhutan: 4,973 BTC
Comment Here 🗨️
𝘗𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 — @CryptoCrunch
🇺🇸 Top Public Companies Now Hold Billions In Bitcoin, With Strategy At $65 Billion And Twenty One Capital At $3.3 Billion.
SAYLOR'S COMPANY HOLDS 843,738 BTC , CRAZY 👀🙌🧡
Comment Here 🗨️
𝘗𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 — @CryptoCrunch
🚨BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Elon Musk, Jensen Huang, Larry Fink, And Tim Cook Are Joining Donald Trump During His High-Stakes China Visit With Top U.S. Executives.
JUST A "OFFICIAL TRIP” WITH HALF THE ECONOMY 🤣📈 🙌
Comment Here 🗨️
𝘗𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 — @CryptoCrunch
BITCOIN NEARS A RARE EVENT 👀😳
₿ Bitcoin Has Closed Below The Previous Mother’s Day Price Only 4 Times Since 2013 And 2026 Could Become The 5th If Prices Stay Under $103,839.
Happy Mother's Day Everyone 🌸🧡
Comment Here 🗨️
𝘗𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 — @CryptoCrunch
THE NEXT FINANCIAL ERA LOOKS ABSOLUTELY WILD 😳 🌐⚡
https://www.facebook.com/share/1HibhNfsnu
𝘗𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 — @CryptoCrunch
👀4❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptocrunch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 145,785 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoCrunchApp | News” (@cryptocrunch), 18,518 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptocrunch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.