Crypto Daily™ is the leading crypto and blockchain news site that ‘bridges’ the gap between companies.
TT: https://www.tiktok.com/@officialcryptodaily
📩 [email protected]
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 98 days, net -15,714. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,208–52,810 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 20:07
30,162
-66
9 Nov 2026, 20:46
30,228
-103
8 Nov 2026, 13:20
30,331
-69
7 Nov 2026, 10:16
30,400
-52
6 Nov 2026, 12:40
30,452
-63
5 Nov 2026, 10:17
30,515
-72
4 Nov 2026, 12:07
30,587
-54
3 Nov 2026, 13:57
30,641
-122
2 Nov 2026, 15:51
30,763
-62
1 Nov 2026, 14:30
30,825
-142
31 Oct 2026, 16:10
30,967
-148
30 Oct 2026, 16:18
31,115
-155
29 Oct 2026, 15:09
31,270
-128
28 Oct 2026, 11:20
31,398
-138
27 Oct 2026, 10:19
31,536
-75
26 Oct 2026, 12:15
31,611
-111
25 Oct 2026, 10:28
31,722
-73
24 Oct 2026, 10:41
31,795
-102
23 Oct 2026, 14:16
31,897
-133
22 Oct 2026, 13:06
32,030
first reading
Engagement
656 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 184 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 30,162 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,490
151 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.968%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
151
of 656 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 148 of 151 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
656 (4 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
829,710
Reactions total
7,846
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 23:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,400
Videos
≈7
Links
≈24,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
33,309 reactions across 605 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🎉
6,721
20.2%
❤
6,716
20.2%
😁
6,637
19.9%
👍
6,598
19.8%
🔥
6,544
19.6%
🤩
93
0.279%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 623 of the 656 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 656 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 151 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Solana Price Prediction: 3 Key Levels as Forward Expands Its SOL++ Strategy
Forward Industries plans up to $30 million in a tokenized REIT on Solana. SOL sits deeply oversold near $80, and support near $74 is the level to watch.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/11/solana-price-prediction-3-key-levels-as-forward-expands-its-sol-strategy
#Solana #SOLPrice #RWA
Can ETH Reach $2,300? Deutsche Bank's Custody Bet Has to Win Back Buyers First
Deutsche Bank now holds Ethereum and Bitcoin for institutions, but ETH remains oversold with sellers in control. Support near $1,850 decides the next move.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/11/can-eth-reach-2-300-deutsche-banks-custody-bet-has-to-win-back-buyers-first
#Ethereum #DeutscheBank #CryptoCustody
Glassnode Warns BTC Has Less Fuel for a Rally After a $14.2B Stablecoin Exodus
Bitcoin slid near $69K as stablecoin supply shrank $14.2B, Glassnode said. Whale bids now guard support near $63K, while resistance sits near $75K.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/11/glassnode-warns-btc-has-less-fuel-for-a-rally-after-a-14-2b-stablecoin-exodus
#Bitcoin #Stablecoins #CryptoLiquidity
Can ETH Reach $2,300? Record Staking Must Outweigh Steady Ether ETF Selling
Ether fell below $2,000 as stakers locked a record share of supply and ETFs saw outflows. See why resistance near $2,300 and support at $1,850 matter now.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/11/can-eth-reach-2-300-record-staking-must-outweigh-steady-ether-etf-selling
#Ethereum #ETHStaking #EthereumETF
XRP Price Prediction: $18M in ETF Outflows Push It Below $1 for the First Time
XRP fell under $1 for the first time this cycle after two days of spot ETF outflows. Whales keep buying, and $1.20 is the level that decides the next move.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/11/xrp-price-prediction-18m-in-etf-outflows-push-it-below-1-for-the-first-time
#XRP #XRPETF #XRPPrice
Peter Schiff Says BTC Is in a Long-Term Bear Market as Bitcoin Trades Under $69K
Bitcoin fell below $69,000 as Peter Schiff called a long-term bear market. RSI shows oversold conditions, and support near $63K now decides the next move.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/11/peter-schiff-says-btc-is-in-a-long-term-bear-market-as-bitcoin-trades-under-69k
#Bitcoin #PeterSchiff #BitcoinBearMarket
Ethereum Price Prediction: 3 Key Levels as BTCS Sells ETH to Defend Its Aave Loan
BTCS sold ether at a loss to protect its $64 million Aave loan. ETH sits just above support near $1,850 with RSI oversold. Here are the levels to watch.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/11/ethereum-price-prediction-3-key-levels-as-btcs-sells-eth-to-defend-its-aave-loan
#Ethereum #BTCS #CryptoLiquidations
Bitcoin collapses to $67,700 and retests 200-week SMA: Is this the bottom?
The Bitcoin price collapsed around $6,300 on Thursday and into Friday - a total of around 8.5%. The price hit a low of $67,640 earlier on Friday, retesting the hugely important 200-week simple moving average (SMA) as it did so. Is this now the bottom for Bitcoin, or could there be one more flush-out to the bull market support trendline at $65…
Bitcoin Price Prediction: $500M in Long Liquidations Push It Toward $65,000
Bitcoin hit a three-month low as over $500 million in long liquidations hit the market. Support near $63K now decides whether the forced selling is done.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/11/bitcoin-price-prediction-500m-in-long-liquidations-push-it-toward-65-000
#Bitcoin #CryptoLiquidations #BTCPrice
Chartist's 1,100% Avalanche Call Faces a Detour as AVAX May Dip Toward $7 First
Analyst Javon Marks sees a 1,100% Avalanche rally, yet AVAX trades below its key averages. Support near $7.77 decides whether a dip toward $7 comes first.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/11/chartists-1-100-avalanche-call-faces-a-detour-as-avax-may-dip-toward-7-first
#Avalanche #AVAXPrice #AVAXPrediction
DOGE Falls 14% in a Week as DogeOS Layer 2 Plans Can't Offset Market-Wide Selling
Dogecoin slid about 14% in a week as DogeOS layer 2 plans failed to lift demand. RSI is oversold, and $0.072 resistance decides whether a bounce can hold.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/11/doge-falls-14-in-a-week-as-dogeos-layer-2-plans-cant-offset-market-wide-selling
#Dogecoin #DogeOS #DOGEPrice
ETH Falls to $2,040 as Its Biggest Buyer Nears the 6.1 Million Ethereum Goal It Set
Ether slipped near $2,040 and below its long-term averages as BitMine nears its 5% supply target. Why the $1,850 support floor now matters for traders.
https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2026/11/eth-falls-to-2-040-as-its-biggest-buyer-nears-the-6-1-million-ethereum-goal-it-set
#Ethereum #BitMine #ETHTreasury
❤13🎉12😁11👍10🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 656 posts we hold for @officialcryptodaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CRYPTO TREYSI @cryptotreysi · 33,430 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 September 2026
Cryptoy ₿ @Cryptoy · 34,048 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
Analytics Insight @analyticsinsightmag · 33,501 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
CoinGape Crypto News @coingape · 22,669 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
BTC FOREX TRADING MONEY INVESTMENT @online_shopping_deal1 · 82,399 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 17 August 2026
Krypto | Finanzen | Politik @kryptodeutsch · 62,256 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Daily™” (@officialcryptodaily), 30,162 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/officialcryptodaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.